scholarly journals Ctf18-RFC and DNA Pol ϵ form a stable leading strand polymerase/clamp loader complex required for normal and perturbed DNA replication

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (14) ◽  
pp. 8128-8145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katy Stokes ◽  
Alicja Winczura ◽  
Boyuan Song ◽  
Giacomo De Piccoli ◽  
Daniel B Grabarczyk
Keyword(s):  
Structural Biology ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Yeast Genetics ◽  
Clamp Loader ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
Fork Stalling

Abstract The eukaryotic replisome must faithfully replicate DNA and cope with replication fork blocks and stalling, while simultaneously promoting sister chromatid cohesion. Ctf18-RFC is an alternative PCNA loader that links all these processes together by an unknown mechanism. Here, we use integrative structural biology combined with yeast genetics and biochemistry to highlight the specific functions that Ctf18-RFC plays within the leading strand machinery via an interaction with the catalytic domain of DNA Pol ϵ. We show that a large and unusually flexible interface enables this interaction to occur constitutively throughout the cell cycle and regardless of whether forks are replicating or stalled. We reveal that, by being anchored to the leading strand polymerase, Ctf18-RFC can rapidly signal fork stalling to activate the S phase checkpoint. Moreover, we demonstrate that, independently of checkpoint signaling or chromosome cohesion, Ctf18-RFC functions in parallel to Chl1 and Mrc1 to protect replication forks and cell viability.

scholarly journals A stable leading strand polymerase/clamp loader complex is required for normal and perturbed eukaryotic DNA replication

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katy Stokes ◽  
Alicja Winczura ◽  
Boyuan Song ◽  
Giacomo De Piccoli ◽  
Daniel B. Grabarczyk
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Yeast Genetics ◽  
Clamp Loader ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Eukaryotic Dna ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
Fork Stalling

AbstractThe eukaryotic replisome must faithfully replicate DNA and cope with replication fork blocks and stalling, while simultaneously promoting sister chromatid cohesion. Ctf18-RFC is an alternative PCNA loader that links all these processes together by an unknown mechanism. Here, we use integrative structural biology combined with yeast genetics and biochemistry to highlight the specific functions that Ctf18-RFC plays within the leading strand machinery via an interaction with the catalytic domain of DNA Pol ε. We show that a large and unusually flexible interface enables this interaction to occur constitutively throughout the cell cycle and regardless of whether forks are replicating or stalled. We reveal that, by being anchored to the leading strand polymerase, Ctf18-RFC can rapidly signal fork stalling to activate the S phase checkpoint. Moreover, we demonstrate that, independently of checkpoint signaling or chromosome cohesion, Ctf18-RFC functions in parallel to Chl1 and Mrc1 to protect replication forks and cell viability.

scholarly journals The yeast S phase checkpoint enables replicating chromosomes to bi-orient and restrain spindle extension during S phase distress

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (7) ◽  
pp. 999-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bachant ◽  
Shannon R. Jessen ◽  
Sarah E. Kavanaugh ◽  
Candida S. Fielding
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Origin Of Replication ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Hydroxyurea Treatment ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

The budding yeast S phase checkpoint responds to hydroxyurea-induced nucleotide depletion by preventing replication fork collapse and the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. Although the block to chromosome segregation has been thought to occur by inhibiting anaphase, we show checkpoint-defective rad53 mutants undergo cycles of spindle extension and collapse after hydroxyurea treatment that are distinct from anaphase cells. Furthermore, chromatid cohesion, whose dissolution triggers anaphase, is dispensable for S phase checkpoint arrest. Kinetochore–spindle attachments are required to prevent spindle extension during replication blocks, and chromosomes with two centromeres or an origin of replication juxtaposed to a centromere rescue the rad53 checkpoint defect. These observations suggest that checkpoint signaling is required to generate an inward force involved in maintaining preanaphase spindle integrity during DNA replication distress. We propose that by promoting replication fork integrity under these conditions Rad53 ensures centromere duplication. Replicating chromosomes can then bi-orient in a cohesin-independent manner to restrain untimely spindle extension.

Pyrimidine dimers block simian virus 40 replication forks

1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 3443-3450
Author(s):  
C A Berger ◽  
H J Edenberg
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Pyrimidine Dimers ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
Uv Lesions

UV light produces lesions, predominantly pyrimidine dimers, which inhibit DNA replication in mammalian cells. The mechanism of inhibition is controversial: is synthesis of a daughter strand halted at a lesion while the replication fork moves on and reinitiates downstream, or is fork progression itself blocked for some time at the site of a lesion? We directly addressed this question by using electron microscopy to examine the distances of replication forks from the origin in unirradiated and UV-irradiated simian virus 40 chromosomes. If UV lesions block replication fork progression, the forks should be asymmetrically located in a large fraction of the irradiated molecules; if replication forks move rapidly past lesions, the forks should be symmetrically located. A large fraction of the simian virus 40 replication forks in irradiated molecules were asymmetrically located, demonstrating that UV lesions present at the frequency of pyrimidine dimers block replication forks. As a mechanism for this fork blockage, we propose that polymerization of the leading strand makes a significant contribution to the energetics of fork movement, so any lesion in the template for the leading strand which blocks polymerization should also block fork movement.

scholarly journals Single-molecule imaging reveals control of parental histone recycling by free histones during DNA replication

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (38) ◽  
pp. eabc0330 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. Gruszka ◽  
S. Xie ◽  
H. Kimura ◽  
H. Yardimci
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Epigenetic Inheritance ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
The Moment

During replication, nucleosomes are disrupted ahead of the replication fork, followed by their reassembly on daughter strands from the pool of recycled parental and new histones. However, because no previous studies have managed to capture the moment that replication forks encounter nucleosomes, the mechanism of recycling has remained unclear. Here, through real-time single-molecule visualization of replication fork progression in Xenopus egg extracts, we determine explicitly the outcome of fork collisions with nucleosomes. Most of the parental histones are evicted from the DNA, with histone recycling, nucleosome sliding, and replication fork stalling also occurring but at lower frequencies. Critically, we find that local histone recycling becomes dominant upon depletion of endogenous histones from extracts, revealing that free histone concentration is a key modulator of parental histone dynamics at the replication fork. The mechanistic details revealed by these studies have major implications for our understanding of epigenetic inheritance.

scholarly journals Replication fork stalling elicits chromatin compaction for the stability of stalling replication forks

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (29) ◽  
pp. 14563-14572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Feng ◽  
Yue Yuan ◽  
Zeyang Li ◽  
Lu Wang ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Cellular Mechanism ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Physical Separation ◽  
Replicative Helicase ◽  
Chromatin Compaction ◽  
Acetylation Site ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
The Stability

DNA replication forks in eukaryotic cells stall at a variety of replication barriers. Stalling forks require strict cellular regulations to prevent fork collapse. However, the mechanism underlying these cellular regulations is poorly understood. In this study, a cellular mechanism was uncovered that regulates chromatin structures to stabilize stalling forks. When replication forks stall, H2BK33, a newly identified acetylation site, is deacetylated and H3K9 trimethylated in the nucleosomes surrounding stalling forks, which results in chromatin compaction around forks. Acetylation-mimic H2BK33Q and its deacetylase clr6-1 mutations compromise this fork stalling-induced chromatin compaction, cause physical separation of replicative helicase and DNA polymerases, and significantly increase the frequency of stalling fork collapse. Furthermore, this fork stalling-induced H2BK33 deacetylation is independent of checkpoint. In summary, these results suggest that eukaryotic cells have developed a cellular mechanism that stabilizes stalling forks by targeting nucleosomes and inducing chromatin compaction around stalling forks. This mechanism is named the “Chromsfork” control: Chromatin Compaction Stabilizes Stalling Replication Forks.

scholarly journals Replication Fork Slowing and Stalling are Distinct, Checkpoint-Independent Consequences of Replicating Damaged DNA

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Ramalingam Iyer ◽  
Nicholas Rhind
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Dna Combing ◽  
Fork Stalling

AbstractIn response to DNA damage during S phase, cells slow DNA replication. This slowing is orchestrated by the intra-S checkpoint and involves inhibition of origin firing and reduction of replication fork speed. Slowing of replication allows for tolerance of DNA damage and suppresses genomic instability. Although the mechanisms of origin inhibition by the intra-S checkpoint are understood, major questions remain about how the checkpoint regulates replication forks: Does the checkpoint regulate the rate of fork progression? Does the checkpoint affect all forks, or only those encountering damage? Does the checkpoint facilitate the replication of polymerase-blocking lesions? To address these questions, we have analyzed the checkpoint in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a single-molecule DNA combing assay, which allows us to unambiguously separate the contribution of origin and fork regulation towards replication slowing, and allows us to investigate the behavior of individual forks. Moreover, we have interrogated the role of forks interacting with individual sites of damage by using three damaging agents—MMS, 4NQO and bleomycin—that cause similar levels of replication slowing with very different frequency of DNA lesions. We find that the checkpoint slows replication by inhibiting origin firing, but not by decreasing fork rates. However, the checkpoint appears to facilitate replication of damaged templates, allowing forks to more quickly pass lesions. Finally, using a novel analytic approach, we rigorously identify fork stalling events in our combing data and show that they play a previously unappreciated role in shaping replication kinetics in response to DNA damage.Author SummaryFaithful duplication of the genome is essential for genetic stability of organisms and species. To ensure faithful duplication, cells must be able to replicate damaged DNA. To do so, they employ checkpoints that regulate replication in response to DNA damage. However, the mechanisms by which checkpoints regulate DNA replication forks, the macromolecular machines that contain the helicases and polymerases required to unwind and copy the parental DNA, is unknown. We have used DNA combing, a single-molecule technique that allows us to monitor the progression of individual replication forks, to characterize the response of fission yeast replication forks to DNA damage that blocks the replicative polymerases. We find that forks pass most lesions with only a brief pause and that this lesion bypass is checkpoint independent. However, at a low frequency, forks stall at lesions, and that the checkpoint is required to prevent these stalls from accumulating single-stranded DNA. Our results suggest that the major role of the checkpoint is not to regulate the interaction of replication forks with DNA damage, per se, but to mitigate the consequences of fork stalling when forks are unable to successfully navigate DNA damage on their own.

scholarly journals Replication dynamics of recombination-dependent replication forks

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Naiman ◽  
Eduard Campillo-Funollet ◽  
Adam T. Watson ◽  
Alice Budden ◽  
Izumi Miyabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo Simulation ◽  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Lagging Strand

AbstractDNA replication fidelity is essential for maintaining genetic stability. Forks arrested at replication fork barriers can be stabilised by the intra-S phase checkpoint, subsequently being rescued by a converging fork, or resuming when the barrier is removed. However, some arrested forks cannot be stabilised and fork convergence cannot rescue in all situations. Thus, cells have developed homologous recombination-dependent mechanisms to restart persistently inactive forks. To understand HR-restart we use polymerase usage sequencing to visualize in vivo replication dynamics at an S. pombe replication barrier, RTS1, and model replication by Monte Carlo simulation. We show that HR-restarted forks synthesise both strands with Pol δ for up to 30 kb without maturing to a δ/ε configuration and that Pol α is not used significantly on either strand, suggesting the lagging strand template remains as a gap that is filled in by Pol δ later. We further demonstrate that HR-restarted forks progress uninterrupted through a fork barrier that arrests canonical forks. Finally, by manipulating lagging strand resection during HR-restart by deleting pku70, we show that the leading strand initiates replication at the same position, signifying the stability of the 3’ single strand in the context of increased resection.

scholarly journals Replisome bypass of transcription complexes and R-loops

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (18) ◽  
pp. 10353-10367
Author(s):  
Jan-Gert Brüning ◽  
Kenneth J Marians
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Bacterial Dna ◽  
Template Strand ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
Lagging Strand

Abstract The vast majority of the genome is transcribed by RNA polymerases. G+C-rich regions of the chromosomes and negative superhelicity can promote the invasion of the DNA by RNA to form R-loops, which have been shown to block DNA replication and promote genome instability. However, it is unclear whether the R-loops themselves are sufficient to cause this instability or if additional factors are required. We have investigated replisome collisions with transcription complexes and R-loops using a reconstituted bacterial DNA replication system. RNA polymerase transcription complexes co-directionally oriented with the replication fork were transient blockages, whereas those oriented head-on were severe, stable blockages. On the other hand, replisomes easily bypassed R-loops on either template strand. Replication encounters with R-loops on the leading-strand template (co-directional) resulted in gaps in the nascent leading strand, whereas lagging-strand template R-loops (head-on) had little impact on replication fork progression. We conclude that whereas R-loops alone can act as transient replication blocks, most genome-destabilizing replication fork stalling likely occurs because of proteins bound to the R-loops.

scholarly journals RNF4 Regulates the BLM Helicase in Recovery From Replication Fork Collapse

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Ellis ◽  
Jianmei Zhu ◽  
Mary K Yagle ◽  
Wei-Chih Yang ◽  
Jing Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Replication Origins ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Response Factors ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
In Cells

Sumoylation is an important enhancer of responses to DNA replication stress and the SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 regulates these responses by ubiquitylation of sumoylated DNA damage response factors. The specific targets and functional consequences of RNF4 regulation in response to replication stress, however, have not been fully characterized. Here we demonstrated that RNF4 is required for the restart of DNA replication following prolonged hydroxyurea (HU)-induced replication stress. Contrary to its role in repair of γ-irradiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), our analysis revealed that RNF4 does not significantly impact recognition or repair of replication stress-associated DSBs. Rather, using DNA fiber assays, we found that the firing of new DNA replication origins, which is required for replication restart following prolonged stress, was inhibited in cells depleted of RNF4. We also provided evidence that RNF4 recognizes and ubiquitylates sumoylated Bloom syndrome DNA helicase BLM and thereby promotes its proteosome-mediated turnover at damaged DNA replication forks. Consistent with it being a functionally important RNF4 substrate, co-depletion of BLM rescued defects in the firing of new replication origins observed in cells depleted of RNF4 alone. We concluded that RNF4 acts to remove sumoylated BLM from collapsed DNA replication forks, which is required to facilitate normal resumption of DNA synthesis after prolonged replication fork stalling and collapse.

scholarly journals SMARCAD1 Mediated Active Replication Fork Stability Maintains Genome Integrity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin Shun Yu Lo ◽  
Marvin van Toorn ◽  
Vincent Gaggioli ◽  
Mariana Paes Dias ◽  
Yifan Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Chromatin Remodeler ◽  
Active Replication ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
Stalled Fork

ABSTRACTStalled fork protection pathway mediated by BRCA1/2 proteins is critical for replication fork stability that has implications in tumorigenesis. However, it is unclear if additional mechanisms are required to maintain replication fork stability. We describe a novel mechanism by which the chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1 stabilizes active replication forks that is essential for resistance towards replication poisons. We find that loss of SMARCAD1 results in toxic enrichment of 53BP1 at replication forks which mediates untimely dissociation of PCNA via the PCNA-unloader, ATAD5. Faster dissociation of PCNA causes frequent fork stalling, inefficient fork restart and accumulation of single-stranded DNA resulting in genome instability. Although, loss of 53BP1 in SMARCAD1 mutants restore PCNA levels, fork restart efficiency, genome stability and tolerance to replication poisons; this requires BRCA1 mediated fork protection. Interestingly, fork protection challenged BRCA1-deficient naïve- or PARPi-resistant tumors require SMARCAD1 mediated active fork stabilization to maintain unperturbed fork progression and cellular proliferation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document