P1274THE CHARACTER OF CARDIAC REMODELING AND VALVE CALCIFICATION IN TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE
Abstract Background and Aims Systematic analysis of cardiac remodeling features in type 2 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is important both in stratification of cardiovascular risk and in choice of adequate treatment strategies. The lack of number and fragmentation of studies, the ambiguity of their data regarding the problem of myocardial reconstruction and cardiac valve calcification (CVC) under these conditions have substantiated the need for this study, its relevance and purpose. Method 136 ESRD patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) were included in this observational cross-sectional study (men, 78; age, 53.9±1.0 years; HD duration, 47.6±4.2 months). The study was performed in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki last revision. Depending on the presence/absence of diabetic nephropathy (DN) all patients were divided into two groups: the 1st one – without DN (n=88); the 2nd one – with DN (n=48). A complete ultrasound examination of the cardiac structure and function including CVC analysis was performed. Data are presented as means±SEM. Mann-Whitney U-test was used for comparison of the quantitative variables, χ2-test – qualitative ones. Results Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (93.8 vs. 78.4%, р=0.020) and eccentric hypertrophy (47.9 vs. 28.4%, р=0.023) were diagnosed more often in patients with DN than those without diabetes. Prevalence of pseudonormal and restrictive types of LV diastolic dysfunction (62.5 vs. 28.4%, p<0.001), systolic dysfunction (27.1 vs. 9.1%, p=0.006) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) (64.6 vs. 35.2%, p=0.001) were significant in the 2nd group. CVC (66.6 vs. 38.6%, р=0.002), combined calcification of mitral (MV) and aortal (AV) valves (35.4 vs. 13.6%, p=0.003), stenoses of MV (16.7 vs. 3.4%, p=0.007) and AV (39.6 vs. 15.9%, p=0.004), and insufficiency of MV (66.7 vs. 44.3%, p=0.013) and AV (35.4 vs. 14.8%, p=0.006) were recorded more often in HD patients with DN. LV myocardial mass index (181.0±7.2 vs. 155.0±5.3 g/m2, p=0.001) as well as right ventricle (RV) diameter (2.80±0.09 vs. 2.47±0.04 cm, p=0.003) were also greater in the 2nd group. Conclusion In type 2 diabetic patients with ESRD occurs maladaptive cardiac remodeling with predominance of unfavourable (especially eccentric) types of LV hypertrophy, RV dilatation, PH, severe LV diastolic and systolic dysfunction, and widespread combined calcification of MV and AV with the valve defects. The identification of risk factors for the progression of the pathological reconstruction of myocardium and CVC in HD patients with DN will be the subject of our further research.
