FP649CAUSES OF UNPLANNED DIALYSIS INITIATION: RESULTS OF THE NORDIC PERIDIALYSIS STUDY

Abstract Background and Aims It has been suggested that, in patients with CKD stage 5, measured GFR (mGFR), defined as the mean of urea and creatinine clearance as measured by a 24-hour urine collection, is a better measure of renal function than estimated GFR (eGFR), based on the CKD-EPI formula. This could be due to reduced muscle mass in this group. Its use is recommended in the ERBP guidelines. Unplanned dialysis initiation (UDI) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and reduced modality choice. It is generally considered undesirable. We hypothesized that the ratio mGFR/eGFR (R) aids prediction of death and end stage kidney disease (ESKD), as defined by permanent dialysis requirement or transplantation. Method All 24-hour measurements of urea and creatinine excretion were extracted from the clinical biochemistry databases in Zealand. Data concerning renal diagnosis, comorbidity, biochemistry, medical treatment, mortality and date of ESKD, were extracted from patient notes, the National Patient Registry and the Danish Nephrology Registry. Patients were included if their eGFR was <30 ml/min/1.73m2. The last available value for each patient was included. Results 1265 patients were included. In 519, body surface area (BSA) was available, and the corrected ratio (RBSA) could be calculated. The urea clearance was 49 ±24% of creatinine clearance. R was median 0.88 (IQR 0.63-1.15), RBSA 0.87 (0.68-1.06). R was not related to eGFR. Comorbidity was associated with lower R, e.g. atherosclerosis (0.90 ±0.41 vs. 0.97 ±0.49*), heart failure (0.80 ±0.37 vs. 0.95 ±0.44*), pulmonary disease (0.80 ±0.37 vs. 0.94 ±0.44***), hepatic disease (0.67 ±0.41 vs. 0.92 ±0.43***), but not diabetes mellitus. It was related to albumin (r=0.24***), C-reactive protein (-0.22***) and biochemical markers of uraemia, e.g. bicarbonate (-0.19***). Medical treatment data was available in 137 patients. R was higher in patients treated with ACE inhibitors (1.20 ±0.50 vs. 1.01 ±0.36*) and diuretics (1.09 ±0.40 vs. 0.94 ±0.35*), but no other treatment groups. Patients were grouped as high R (H, >1.25), medium (M, 0.75-1.25) or low (L, <0.75). R was not associated with prognosis at one year, but L patients had a significantly higher ESKD and mortality incidence at 3 months. For patients with eGFR 10-15 ml/min/1.73m2, ESKD incidence was L 22%, M 15%, H 5%, mortality 19, 5, and 2% respectively. Similar findings were seen in other groups, e.g. eGFR 15-20 ml/min/1.73m2: ESKD 11, 2, and 0%; death 11, 5, and 1%. UDI was higher for L patients. For patients with eGFR 10-15 ml/min/1.73m2, UDI occurred in L: 47%, M:27%, H:25%. For patients with eGFR 10-15 ml/min/1.73m2 the figures were 51, 38 and 12% respectively. Findings for the subgroup of patients with RBSA measurements were similar. *:p<0.05; **:p<001;***:p<0.001 Conclusion A low mGFR/eGFR ratio is associated with comorbidity, malnutrition, inflammation and biochemical uraemia. It a marker of early ESKD, death and unplanned dialysis initiation, independently of eGFR. Particular attention paid to patients with a low R may lower the incidence of unplanned dialysis requirement.

Download Full-text

The ratio of measured to estimated glomerular filtration rate may be a marker of early mortality and dialysis requirement

BMC Nephrology ◽

10.1186/s12882-021-02561-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

James G. Heaf ◽

Rafal Yahya ◽

Morten Dahl

Keyword(s):

Dialysis Initiation ◽

National Patient Registry ◽

Treatment Groups ◽

Reactive Protein ◽

Ckd Stage ◽

National Patient ◽

Highly Correlated ◽

Post Hoc ◽

Unplanned Dialysis

Abstract Background It has been suggested that, in patients with CKD stage 5, measured GFR (mGFR), defined as the mean of urea and creatinine clearance, as measured by a 24-h urine collection, is a better measure of renal function than estimated GFR (eGFR), based on the CKD-EPI formula. This could be due to reduced muscle mass in this group. Its use is recommended in the ERBP guidelines. Unplanned dialysis initiation (DI) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and reduced modality choice and is generally considered undesirable. We hypothesized that the ratio mGFR/eGFR (M/E) aids prediction of death and DI. Methods All 24-h measurements of urea and creatinine excretion were extracted from the clinical biochemistry databases in Zealand. Data concerning renal diagnosis, comorbidity, biochemistry, medical treatment, mortality and date of DI, were extracted from patient notes, the National Patient Registry and the Danish Nephrology Registry. Patients were included if their eGFR was < 30 ml/min/1.73m2. The last available value for each patient was included. Follow-up was 12 months. Results One thousand two hundred sixty-five patients were included. M/E was median 0.91 ± 0.43. It was highly correlated to previous determinations. It was negatively correlated to eGFR, comorbidity, high age and female sex. It was positively related to albumin and negatively to C-reactive protein. M/E was higher in patients treated with ACE inhibitors and diuretics but no other treatment groups. On a multivariate analysis, M/E was negatively correlated with mortality and combined mortality/DI, but not DI. A post hoc analysis showed a negative correlation to DI at 3 months. For patients with an eGFR 10–15 ml/min/1.73m2, combined mortality and DI at 3 months was for low M/E (< 0.75) 36%, medium (0.75–1.25) 20%, high (> 1.25) 8%. A low M/E predicted increased need for unplanned DI. A supplementary analysis in 519 patients where body surface area values were available, allowing BSA-corrected M/E to be analyzed, revealed similar results. Conclusion A low mGFR/eGFR ratio is associated with comorbidity, malnutrition, and inflammation. It is a marker of early DI, mortality, and unplanned dialysis initiation, independently of eGFR, age and comorbidity. Particular attention paid to patients with a low M/E may lower the incidence of unplanned dialysis requirement.

Download Full-text

How To Build a Successful Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Program

Kidney360 ◽

10.34067/kid.0002392020 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (10) ◽

pp. 1163-1175

Author(s):

Nilum Rajora ◽

Shani Shastri ◽

Gulzar Pirwani ◽

Ramesh Saxena

Keyword(s):

Peritoneal Dialysis ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Cost Of Care ◽

Dialysis Initiation ◽

High Rate ◽

Center Staff ◽

Effective Option ◽

Poor Outcomes ◽

Unplanned Dialysis ◽

Improve Patient

In-center hemodialysis (HD) remains the predominant dialysis therapy in patients with ESKD. Many patients with ESKD present in late stage, requiring urgent dialysis initiation, and the majority start HD with central venous catheters (CVCs), which are associated with poor outcomes and high cost of care. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters can be safely placed in such patients with late-presenting ESKD, obviating the need for CVCs. PD can begin almost immediately in the recumbent position, using low fill volumes. Such PD initiations, commencing within 2 weeks of the catheter placement, are termed urgent-start PD (USPD). Most patients with an intact peritoneal cavity and stable home situation are eligible for USPD. Although there is a small risk of PD catheter–related mechanical complications, most can be managed conservatively. Moreover, overall outcomes of USPD are comparable to those with planned PD initiations, in contrast to the high rate of catheter-related infections and bacteremia associated with urgent-start HD. The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has further exposed the vulnerability of patients with ESKD getting in-center HD. PD can mitigate the risk of infection by reducing environmental exposure to the virus. Thus, USPD is a safe and cost-effective option for unplanned dialysis initiation in patients with late-presenting ESKD. To develop a successful USPD program, a strong infrastructure with clear pathways is essential. Coordination of care between nephrologists, surgeons or interventionalists, and hospital and PD center staff is imperative so that patient education, home visits, PD catheter placements, and urgent PD initiations are accomplished expeditiously. Implementation of urgent-start PD will help to increase PD use, reduce cost, and improve patient outcomes, and will be a step forward in fostering the goal set by the Advancing American Kidney Health initiative.

Download Full-text