scholarly journals Germline cancer predisposition variants and pediatric glioma: a population-based study in California

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 864-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivo S Muskens ◽  
Adam J de Smith ◽  
Chenan Zhang ◽  
Helen M Hansen ◽  
Libby Morimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle Control ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Pediatric Glioma ◽  
Germline Variants ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Pediatric Astrocytoma ◽  
Pediatric Glioblastoma

Abstract Background Pediatric astrocytoma constitutes a majority of malignant pediatric brain tumors. Previous studies that investigated pediatric cancer predisposition have primarily been conducted in tertiary referral centers and focused on cancer predisposition genes. In this study, we investigated the contribution of rare germline variants to risk of malignant pediatric astrocytoma on a population level. Methods DNA samples were extracted from neonatal dried bloodspots from 280 pediatric astrocytoma patients (predominantly high grade) born and diagnosed in California and were subjected to whole-exome sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed using agnostic exome-wide gene-burden testing and variant identification for putatively pathogenic variants in 175 a priori candidate cancer-predisposition genes. Results We identified 33 putatively pathogenic germline variants among 31 patients (11.1%) which were located in 24 genes largely involved in DNA repair and cell cycle control. Patients with pediatric glioblastoma were most likely to harbor putatively pathogenic germline variants (14.3%, N = 9/63). Five variants were located in tumor protein 53 (TP53), of which 4 were identified among patients with glioblastoma (6.3%, N = 4/63). The next most frequently mutated gene was neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), in which putatively pathogenic variants were identified in 4 patients with astrocytoma not otherwise specified. Gene-burden testing also revealed that putatively pathogenic variants in TP53 were significantly associated with pediatric glioblastoma on an exome-wide level (odds ratio, 32.8, P = 8.04 × 10−7). Conclusion A considerable fraction of pediatric glioma patients, especially those of higher grade, harbor a putatively pathogenic variant in a cancer predisposition gene. Some of these variants may be clinically actionable or may warrant genetic counseling.

scholarly journals Cancer Predisposition Sequencing Reporter (CPSR): a flexible variant report engine for high-throughput germline screening in cancer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigve Nakken ◽  
Vladislav Saveliev ◽  
Oliver Hofmann ◽  
Pål Møller ◽  
Ola Myklebost ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Throughput ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Germline Variants ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Risk Variants ◽  
The Status ◽  
Predisposition Genes

AbstractThe value of high-throughput germline genetic testing is increasingly recognized in clinical cancer care. Disease-associated germline variants in cancer patients are important for risk management and surveillance, surgical decisions, and can also have major implications for treatment strategies since many are in DNA repair genes. With the increasing availability of high-throughput DNA sequencing in cancer clinics and research, there is thus a need to provide clinically oriented sequencing reports for germline variants and their potential therapeutic relevance on a per-patient basis. To meet this need we have developed the Cancer Predisposition Sequencing Reporter (CPSR), an open-source computational workflow that generates a structured report of germline variants identified in known cancer predisposition genes, highlighting markers of therapeutic, prognostic, and diagnostic relevance. A fully automated variant classification procedure based on more than 30 refined ACMG criteria represents an integral part of the workflow. Importantly, the set of cancer predisposition genes profiled in the report can be flexibly chosen from more than 40 virtual gene panels established by scientific experts, enabling customization of the report for different screening purposes and clinical contexts. The report can be configured to also list actionable secondary variant findings as recommended by ACMG, as well as the status of low-risk variants from genome-wide association studies in cancer. CPSR demonstrates superior sensitivity and comparable specificity for the detection of pathogenic variants when compared to existing algorithms. Technically, the tool is implemented in Python/R, and is freely available through Docker technology. Source code, documentation, example reports, and installation instructions are accessible via the project GitHub page: https://github.com/sigven/cpsr.

Primer on Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Genes Included Within Somatic Next-Generation Sequencing Panels

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Zade Akras ◽  
Brandon Bungo ◽  
Brandie H. Leach ◽  
Jessica Marquard ◽  
Manmeet Ahluwalia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Germline Variants ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Germline Genes ◽  
Number Of Genes ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Hereditary Cancer Predisposition

PURPOSE It has been estimated that 5% to 10% of cancers are due to hereditary causes. Recent data sets indicate that the incidence of hereditary cancer may be as high as 17.5% in patients with cancer, and a notable subset is missed if screening is solely by family history and current syndrome-based testing guidelines. Identification of germline variants has implications for both patients and their families. There is currently no comprehensive overview of cancer susceptibility genes or inclusion of these genes in commercially available somatic testing. We aimed to summarize genes linked to hereditary cancer and the somatic and germline panels that include such genes. METHODS Germline predisposition genes were chosen if commercially available for testing. Penetrance was defined as low, moderate, or high according to whether the gene conferred a 0% to 20%, 20% to 50%, or 50% to 100% lifetime risk of developing the cancer or, when percentages were not available, was estimated on the basis of existing literature descriptions. RESULTS We identified a total of 89 genes linked to hereditary cancer predisposition, and we summarized these genes alphabetically and by organ system. We considered four germline and six somatic commercially available panel tests and quantified the coverage of germline genes across them. Comparison between the number of genes that had germline importance and the number of genes included in somatic testing showed that many but not all germline genes are tested by frequently used somatic panels. CONCLUSION The inclusion of cancer-predisposing genes in somatic variant testing panels makes incidental germline findings likely. Although somatic testing can be used to screen for germline variants, this strategy is inadequate for comprehensive screening. Access to genetic counseling is essential for interpretation of germline implications of somatic testing and implementation of appropriate screening and follow-up.

scholarly journals Understanding Inherited Risk in Unselected Newly Diagnosed Patients With Endometrial Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Karen A. Cadoo ◽  
Diana L. Mandelker ◽  
Semanti Mukherjee ◽  
Carolyn Stewart ◽  
Deborah DeLair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Germline Variants ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Generation Sequencing

PURPOSE Mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes and PTEN, diagnostic of Lynch and Cowden syndromes, respectively, represent the only established inherited predisposition genes in endometrial cancer to date. The prevalence of other cancer predisposition genes remains unclear. We determined the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in unselected patients with endometrial cancer scheduled for surgical consultation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients prospectively consented (April 2016 to May 2017) to an institutional review board–approved protocol of tumor-normal sequencing via a custom next-generation sequencing panel—the Memorial Sloan Kettering–Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets—that yielded germline results for more than 75 cancer predisposition genes. Tumors were assessed for microsatellite instability. Per institutional standards, all tumors underwent Lynch syndrome screening via immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair proteins. RESULTS Of 156 patients who consented to germline genetic testing, 118 (76%) had stage I disease. In 104 patients (67%), tumors were endometrioid, and 60 (58%) of those tumors were grade 1. Twenty-four pathogenic germline variants were identified in 22 patients (14%): seven (4.5%) had highly penetrant cancer syndromes and 15 (9.6%) had variants in low-penetrance, moderate-penetrance, or recessive genes. Of these, five (21%) were in Lynch syndrome genes (two MSH6, two PMS2, and one MLH1). All five tumors had concordant IHC staining; two (40%) were definitively microsatellite instability–high by next-generation sequencing. One patient had a known BRCA1 mutation, and one had an SMARCA4 deletion. The remaining 17 variants (71%) were incremental findings in low- and moderate-penetrance variants or genes associated with recessive disease. CONCLUSION In unselected patients with predominantly low-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer, germline multigene panel testing identified cancer predisposition gene variants in 14%. This finding may have implications for future cancer screening and risk-reduction recommendations. Universal IHC screening for Lynch syndrome successfully identifies the majority (71%) of high-penetrance germline mutations.

scholarly journals Germline Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes Among Women With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siddhartha Yadav ◽  
Chunling Hu ◽  
Katherine L. Nathanson ◽  
Jeffrey N. Weitzel ◽  
David E. Goldgar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Clinical Cohort ◽  
Breast Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Multigene Panel

PURPOSE To determine the contribution of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in hereditary cancer testing panel genes to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 2,999 women with ILC from a population-based cohort and 3,796 women with ILC undergoing clinical multigene panel testing (clinical cohort). Frequencies of germline PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were compared between women with ILC and unaffected female controls and between women with ILC and infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC). RESULTS The frequency of PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes among women with ILC was 6.5% in the clinical cohort and 5.2% in the population-based cohort. In case-control analysis, CDH1 and BRCA2 PVs were associated with high risks of ILC (odds ratio [OR] > 4) and CHEK2, ATM, and PALB2 PVs were associated with moderate (OR = 2-4) risks. BRCA1 PVs and CHEK2 p.Ile157Thr were not associated with clinically relevant risks (OR < 2) of ILC. Compared with IDC, CDH1 PVs were > 10-fold enriched, whereas PVs in BRCA1 were substantially reduced in ILC. CONCLUSION The study establishes that PVs in ATM, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, and PALB2 are associated with an increased risk of ILC, whereas BRCA1 PVs are not. The similar overall PV frequencies for ILC and IDC suggest that cancer histology should not influence the decision to proceed with genetic testing. Similar to IDC, multigene panel testing may be appropriate for women with ILC, but CDH1 should be specifically discussed because of low prevalence and gastric cancer risk.

scholarly journals The ICR639 CPG NGS validation series: A resource to assess analytical sensitivity of cancer predisposition gene testing

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Shazia Mahamdallie ◽  
Elise Ruark ◽  
Esty Holt ◽  
Emma Poyastro-Pearson ◽  
Anthony Renwick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Copy Number Variations ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Real Sequence ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Gene Testing ◽  
Validation Series

The analytical sensitivity of a next generation sequencing (NGS) test reflects the ability of the test to detect real sequence variation. The evaluation of analytical sensitivity relies on the availability of gold-standard, validated, benchmarking datasets. For NGS analysis the availability of suitable datasets has been limited. Most laboratories undertake small scale evaluations using in-house data, and/or rely on in silico generated datasets to evaluate the performance of NGS variant detection pipelines. Cancer predisposition genes (CPGs), such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are amongst the most widely tested genes in clinical practice today. Hundreds of providers across the world are now offering CPG testing using NGS methods. Validating and comparing the analytical sensitivity of CPG tests has proved difficult, due to the absence of comprehensive, orthogonally validated, benchmarking datasets of CPG pathogenic variants. To address this we present the ICR639 CPG NGS validation series. This dataset comprises data from 639 individuals. Each individual has sequencing data generated using the TruSight Cancer Panel (TSCP), a targeted NGS assay for the analysis of CPGs, together with orthogonally generated data showing the presence of at least one CPG pathogenic variant per individual. The set consists of 645 pathogenic variants in total. There is strong representation of the most challenging types of variants to detect, with 339 indels, including 16 complex indels and 24 with length greater than five base pairs and 74 exon copy number variations (CNVs) including 23 single exon CNVs. The series includes pathogenic variants in 31 CPGs, including 502 pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2, making this an important comprehensive validation dataset for providers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 NGS testing. We have deposited the TSCP FASTQ files of the ICR639 series in the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) under accession number EGAD00001004134.

scholarly journals Germline Pathogenic Variants in Homologous Recombination and DNA Repair Genes in an Asian Cohort of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Ren Toh ◽  
Jian Bang Chiang ◽  
Siao Ting Chong ◽  
Sock Hoai Chan ◽  
Nur Diana Binte Ishak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Colorectal Cancers ◽  
Dna Repair Genes ◽  
Young Onset ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Repair Genes

Abstract Background Growing evidence suggests a role for cancer susceptibility genes such as BRCA2 and PALB2 in young-onset colorectal cancers. Using a cohort of young colorectal cancer patients, we sought to identify and provide functional evidence for germline pathogenic variants of DNA repair genes not typically associated with colorectal cancer. Methods We recruited 88 patients with young-onset colorectal cancers seen at a general oncology center. Whole-exome sequencing was performed to identify variants in DNA repair and colorectal cancer predisposition genes. Pathogenic BRCA2 and PALB2 variants were analyzed using immunoblot and immunofluorescence on patient-derived lymphoblastoid cells. Results In general, our cohort displayed characteristic features of young-onset colorectal cancers. Most patients had left-sided tumors and were diagnosed at late stages. Four patients had familial adenomatous polyposis, as well as pathogenic APC variants. We identified 12 pathogenic variants evenly distributed between DNA repair and colorectal cancer predisposition genes. Six patients had pathogenic variants in colorectal cancer genes: APC (n = 4) and MUTYH monoallelic (n = 2). Another six had pathogenic variants in DNA repair genes: ATM (n = 1), BRCA2 (n = 1), PALB2 (n = 1), NTHL1 (n = 1), and WRN (n = 2). Pathogenic variants BRCA2 c.9154C>T and PALB2 c.1059delA showed deficient homologous recombination repair, evident from the impaired RAD51 nuclear localization and foci formation. Conclusion A substantial portion of pathogenic variants in young-onset colorectal cancer was found in DNA repair genes not previously associated with colorectal cancer. This may have implications for the management of patients. Further studies are needed to ascertain the enrichment of pathogenic DNA repair gene variants in colorectal cancers.

Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15555-e15555
Author(s):  
Leigh Anne Anne Stout ◽  
Nawal Kassem ◽  
Cynthia Hunter ◽  
Santosh Philips ◽  
Milan Radovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Allele Frequency ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Germline Variants ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Invasive Method ◽  
Ctdna Analysis ◽  
High Level ◽  
Germline Testing

e15555 Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a non-invasive method to guide therapy selection for cancer patients. Identification of inherited germline cancer predisposition mutations that have significant implications for at-risk relatives may be missed during routine ctDNA testing. Allele frequency has the potential to enhance the likelihood that a mutation is germline; and is often reported in many NGS tests from ctDNA. Here, we report on the fidelity of allele frequency in ctDNA as a predictor for pathogenic germline variant carriage. Methods: ctDNA sequencing of patients with metastatic cancer from the Indiana University Health Precision Genomics Program was performed using the FoundationOne Liquid assay. All variants detected by the ctDNA assay report were considered. All patients also had germline testing information and pathogenicity of germline variants were determined using ClinVar. Germline variants with conflicting interpretations were manually reviewed to determine pathogenicity. Comparisons between ctDNA results with known germline status were performed. Results: Of 91 previously identified germline cancer predisposition variants, 36 (40%) were also identified by ctDNA analysis. All germline variants that were tested for in the ctDNA assay (n = 36, 100%) were identified. When detected, the allele frequencies of detected germline variants in the ctDNA ranged from 39-87.6% with an average of 52.1%. Conversely, 111 of 160 (69%) variants identified by ctDNA analysis with allele frequency between 40-60% in a cancer predisposition gene were found to be germline in origin (regardless of pathogenicity). Variants in the BRCA2, BRCA1, and CDH1 genes were most likely to be germline in origin (26/27 [96%], 20/22 [91%], 13/15 [87%], respectively). Variants in the TP53 and APC genes were least likely to be germline in origin (9/36 [25%] and 1/6 [17%], respectively). There was an 85% (95/111) concordance in actionability between the somatic testing lab and ClinVar germline classifications. Of the 16 discordant variants, 100% were determined to be actionable by the somatic testing lab but not actionable in ClinVar. Conclusions: ctDNA allele frequency can alter the likelihood that a variant is germline. Importantly, however, this testing is far from comprehensive and should not be used as a replacement for germline testing. Variants with allele frequency between 40-60% in cancer predisposition genes should induce a high level of suspicion for germline status.

Germline pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes among women with invasive lobular cancer of breast.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10581-10581
Author(s):  
Siddhartha Yadav ◽  
Chunling Hu ◽  
Susan M. Domchek ◽  
Jeffrey N. Weitzel ◽  
David Goldgar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Clinical Cohort ◽  
Breast Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Multigene Panel Testing ◽  
Multigene Panel

10581 Background: The prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in cancer predisposition genes among women with invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) and the risk of ILC in PV carriers is not well-defined. Methods: The study included 2,999 women with ILC and 32,544 unaffected controls from a population-based cohort; 3,796 women with ILC and 20,323 women with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) undergoing clinical multigene panel testing (clinical cohort); and 125,748 exome sequences from unrelated women without a cancer diagnosis in the gnomAD 3.0 dataset. Frequencies of germline PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were compared between women with ILC and unaffected controls in both cohorts and between women with ILC and IDC in the clinical cohort. Results: The frequency of PVs in breast cancer predisposition genes among women with ILC was 6.5% in the clinical cohort and 5.2% in the population-based cohort. In case-control analyses, CDH1 and BRCA2 PVs were associated with high risks of ILC (Odds ratio (OR) > 4), and CHEK2, ATM and PALB2 PVs were associated with moderate (OR = 2-4) risks. BRCA1 PVs and CHEK2 p.Ile157Thr were not associated with clinically relevant risks (OR < 2) of ILC. PV frequencies in these genes in ILC and IDC were similar except for PV frequencies in BRCA1 and CDH1. Conclusions: The study establishes that PVs in ATM, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2 and PALB2 are associated with an increased risk of ILC, whereas BRCA1 PVs are not. The similar overall PV frequencies for ILC and IDC suggest that cancer histology should not influence the decision to proceed with genetic testing. While, multigene panel testing may be appropriate for women with ILC, CDH1 should be specifically discussed in the context of low prevalence and attendant gastric cancer risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document