scholarly journals Trial working groups for paediatric brain tumours

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv9-iv9
Author(s):  
Kristian Aquilina ◽  
Ruman Rahman ◽  
David Walker ◽  
Emma Campbell

Abstract Aims Children's brain tumours are the biggest cancer killer in children and young adults. Several recent developments have the potential to change the treatment of brain tumours in children. These include intra-CSF chemotherapy, ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption, convection enhanced delivery, polymer delivery systems and electric field therapy, as well as intra-arterial and intra-nasal chemotherapy. To date, there have been very few clinical trials to evaluate any of these. The science and technology underlying these developments is not traditionally embedded within the standard paediatric neuro-oncology network. In addition, custom-built hardware, novel surgical procedures and, in some cases, the testing and licensing of implantable devices, add difficulty at the regulatory level. Method The authors participated in an international workshop funded by the charity Children with Cancer UK in 2016, where different experimental techniques aimed at optimising CNS drug delivery were discussed. Following this workshop and two subsequent workshops run by the CBTDDC (Children’s Brain Tumour Drug Delivery Consortium) in 2018 and 2020, the CBTDDC and the recently developed ITCC (Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer) brain tumour group started working together to set up a new initiative. Called the ‘Clinical Trials Working Group for Central Nervous System Drug Delivery’, this aims to accelerate clinical trials to assess the safety and effectiveness of drug delivery devices for the treatment of paediatric brain tumours. On March 1st, 2021, CBTDDC with guest chair, Mr Kristian Aquilina (Consultant Paediatric Neurosurgeon at Great Ormond Street Hospital), hosted the first virtual meeting of this group. Results We have assembled a prestigious steering group, comprising international researchers and clinicians with expertise in diverse aspects of translational and clinical research in CNS drug delivery. At our first group meeting on March 1st, 2021, 38 leading brain tumour research scientists and clinicians from the UK, EU and US tackled the challenges head-on, with commitment and a driving passion to identify and move forwards with the most effective ways of translating drug delivery modalities into clinical trials. Attendees were split into three break-out sessions based on distinct drug delivery systems, and lots of insightful comments were collated. Conclusion The ideas generated during the 1st March meeting will help form the basis of a CBTDDC ‘Clinical Trials’ workshop in the autumn of 2021. In particular, there was an agreed consensus that a key objective will be the creation of a ‘Roadmap’ document for pre-clinical to clinical translation which would be shared with the paediatric neuro-oncology research community. CBTDDC look forward to working with steering group as we act on their recommendations to address the current challenges faced by translational drug delivery research. We present this abstract to the BNOS Annual 2021 Meeting to raise awareness of this initiative with the large number of relevant stakeholders who will be attending the event.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i48-i48
Author(s):  
Ruman Rahman ◽  
David Walker ◽  
Emma Campbell ◽  
Kristian Aquilina

Abstract Introduction Brain tumours are the biggest cancer killer in children and young adults. Several recent developments have the potential to change the treatment of brain tumours in children. These include ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption, convection enhanced delivery, polymer delivery systems and electric field therapy, as well as intra-arterial, intra-CSF and intra-nasal chemotherapy. To date, there have been very few clinical trials to evaluate any of these. The science and technology underlying these developments is not traditionally embedded within the standard paediatric neuro-oncology network. In addition, custom-built hardware, novel surgical procedures and, in some cases, the testing and licensing of implantable devices, add difficulty at the regulatory level. Methods The authors participated in an international workshop funded by the charity Children with Cancer UK in 2016, where different experimental techniques aimed at optimising CNS drug delivery were discussed. Following this workshop and two subsequent workshops run by the CBTDDC (Children’s Brain Tumour Drug Delivery Consortium) in 2018 and 2020, the CBTDDC and the recently developed ITCC (Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer) brain tumour group started working together to set up a new initiative. This aims to develop CNS-delivery-focused trial working groups for paediatric brain tumours. Results We have assembled a prestigious steering group, comprising international researchers and clinicians with expertise in diverse aspects of translational and clinical research in CNS drug delivery. At our first group meeting in March, participants will discuss the most effective ways of translating the emerging drug delivery modalities into clinical trials. Prioritised actions will be taken forward and the group will reconvene to discuss developments and next steps at a workshop in the Autumn. Conclusion We present this abstract to the SNO Paediatric conference to raise awareness of this initiative with the large number of relevant stakeholders who will be attending the event.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv2-iv3
Author(s):  
Ruman Rahman ◽  
David Walker ◽  
Emma Campbell ◽  
Kristian Aquilina

Abstract INTRODUCTION Brain tumours are the biggest cancer killer in children and young adults. Several recent developments have the potential to change the outlook for these children, including intra-CSF chemotherapy, ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption, convection enhanced delivery, polymer delivery systems, electric field therapy, and intra-arterial and intra-nasal chemotherapy. To date, there have been very few clinical trials to evaluate these. In addition, custom-built hardware, novel surgical procedures and the testing and licensing of implantable devices add difficulty at the regulatory level. METHODS The authors participated in an international workshop funded by the charity Children with Cancer UK in 2016, where different experimental techniques aimed at optimising CNS drug delivery were discussed. Following this and two subsequent workshops run by the CBTDDC (Children’s Brain Tumour Drug Delivery Consortium), the CBTDDC and the ITCC (Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer) brain tumour group launched the ‘Clinical Trials Working Group for Central Nervous System Drug Delivery’. This aims to accelerate clinical trials to assess the safety and effectiveness of drug delivery devices for the treatment of paediatric brain tumours. RESULTS On 1 March, 2021, CBTDDC and Mr Kristian Aquilina (Consultant Paediatric Neurosurgeon at Great Ormond Street Hospital) hosted the first steering group meeting, comprising 38 leading brain tumour research scientists and clinicians from the UK, EU and US. CONCLUSION The ideas generated during the March meeting are driving the agenda for a Clinical Trials Workshop that will be held in the autumn of 2021. In particular, there was agreed consensus that a ‘Roadmap’ document for pre-clinical to clinical translation needs to be created and shared with the paediatric neuro-oncology research community. We present this abstract to the CNS Clinical Trials Meeting to raise awareness of this initiative with the large number of relevant stakeholders who will be attending the event.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi181-vi181
Author(s):  
Ruman Rahman ◽  
David Walker ◽  
Emma Campbell ◽  
Kristian Aquilina

Abstract INTRODUCTION Children's brain tumours are the biggest cancer killer in children and young adults. Several recent developments have the potential to change the treatment of brain tumours in children, including intra-CSF chemotherapy, ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption, convection enhanced delivery, polymer delivery systems and electric field therapy, as well as intra-arterial and intra-nasal chemotherapy. To date, there have been very few clinical trials to evaluate these. The science and technology underlying these developments is not traditionally embedded within the paediatric neuro-oncology network. In addition, custom-built hardware, novel surgical procedures, and the testing and licensing of implantable devices, add difficulty at the regulatory level. METHODS In early 2021, we launched the ‘Clinical Trials Working Group for Central Nervous System Drug Delivery’. This aims to accelerate clinical trials to assess the safety and effectiveness of drug delivery devices for treating paediatric brain tumours. On March 1st, we hosted the first virtual meeting of this group, involving 38 leading brain tumour scientists and clinicians from the UK, EU and US. RESULTS A pre-meeting survey identified the main challenges to acceleration of this preclinical to clinical research pathway as: (1) a lack of specific funding for prototype development and/or scale up for clinical trials; (2) difficulties in navigation of the regulatory landscape; (3) lack of accurate preclinical models; and (4) increased need for multicentric working. Discussion at the meeting echoed the survey responses, and there was agreed consensus that a ‘Roadmap’ document for preclinical to clinical translation should be created. Following the meeting, we launched a pump prime funding call for projects that will address challenges along the preclinical to clinical pathway to move trial proposals into an ‘advanced state of readiness’. CONCLUSION The ideas generated during the initial meeting will help form the basis of a ‘Clinical Trials’ workshop in the autumn of 2021.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Nailor ◽  
David A Walker ◽  
Thomas S Jacques ◽  
Kathy E Warren ◽  
Henry Brem ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Asya Ozkizilcik ◽  
Parker Davidson ◽  
Hulusi Turgut ◽  
Hari S. Sharma ◽  
Aruna Sharma ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv11-iv12
Author(s):  
Kerlann Le Calvez ◽  
Peter Treasure ◽  
Matt Williams

Abstract Introduction Access to clinical trials is a common request for patients with brain tumours. However, opening clinical trials requires additional work per centre opened. We have previously shown that surgical and oncology workload varies between centres, and fluctuates over time. There is a trade-off between offering access to clinical trials and increasing costs associated with opening trials in centres that treat few patients. Methods We used two separate datasets from England covering 3 years – one for neurosurgical workload and one for radiotherapy. We only included adult patients and calculated cumulative proportions of the malignant primary brain tumour population (C71) by number of centres. We investigated stability by checking how many patients would have to be added/ removed from a centre to change their rank. Results There were 7061 surgical and 5060 radiotherapy patients. To capture 25% of patients, we would need to open trials in 4 surgical/5 radiotherapy centres; for 50%, 9 surgical/ 13 radiotherapy centres; for 75%, 16 surgical/ 24 radiotherapy centres. Centre rank was fluid: adding 16 surgical/9 radiotherapy patients would change the rank of a centre. Discussion These are the first data to allow for rational planning of trials in brain tumour patients. We have shown that we can reach 75% of the brain tumour population by opening trials in ~50% of surgical and radiotherapy centres. Centre rank alters over year, so we should be cautious about being too prescriptive. Nonetheless, these data should allow some rational planning of trial centre inclusion.


Author(s):  
Arti Patel ◽  
Yashwant V. Pathak

Nanomedicine has vastly improved the treatment and diagnosis of many cardiovascular conditions such as atherosclerosis, myocardial ischemia, myocardial infarction, restenosis, and thrombosis. A few nanoparticle drug delivery systems that are currently being tested and used in clinical trials include lipid-based drug delivery, controlled drug release, and specific targeting. The chapter describes the various drug delivery methods, the various nanoparticles, and their application on specific cardiovascular conditions. This chapter compiles examples of specific clinical trials that are being conducted, using nanoparticles for therapy of cardiovascular conditions.


2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadab Pathan ◽  
Zeenat Iqbal ◽  
Syed Zaidi ◽  
Sushma Talegaonkar ◽  
Divya Vohra ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document