scholarly journals 34. TARGETED THERAPY FOR HER2-POSITIVE BREAST CANCER BRAIN METASTASES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii6-ii6
Author(s):  
Anders Erickson ◽  
Farinaz Ghodrati ◽  
Sunit Das

Abstract INTRO One in three women with HER2-positive breast cancer will develop brain metastases, or intracranial metastatic disease (IMD). Historically, treatment of IMD has been confined to surgery and radiotherapy, with a limited role for chemotherapy. However, recent interest has burgeoned in a role for targeted therapy for treatment of IMD. The lack of high-level evidence, such as meta-analyses, regarding the role of targeted therapy in the management of IMD has prevented its inclusion in guidelines directing treatment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the role of targeted therapy for IMD in women with HER2-positive breast cancer. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, a search of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and grey literature sources was conducted by two independent reviewers. Controlled trials and cohort studies that reported survival, safety, or response outcomes for patients receiving HER2-targeted therapy following IMD diagnosis were included. Meta-analyses using a random-effects model were conducted for OS and PFS. RESULTS 111 studies reporting on 8226 patients were included. Primary analysis of only RCTs found that HER2-targeted therapy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46–0.86; n = 392) but not PFS (HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.30–1.85; n = 392) following IMD diagnosis. Secondary analysis combining RCTs and comparative observational studies found that HER2-targeted therapy was associated with improved OS (HR 0.42; 95% CI, 0.35–0.51; n = 2756) but not PFS (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.27–1.21; n = 460) following IMD diagnosis. Full analysis will be conducted for all 111 studies for pre-specified outcomes including intracranial PFS. CONCLUSION These findings support a potential role for HER2-targeted therapy in the management of IMD from HER2-positive breast cancer. Final analysis will synthesize current evidence for outcomes of intracranial response, survival, and safety.

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 ◽  
pp. 101965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Schettini ◽  
Tomás Pascual ◽  
Benedetta Conte ◽  
Nuria Chic ◽  
Fara Brasó-Maristany ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 114 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mates ◽  
G.G. Fletcher ◽  
O.C. Freedman ◽  
A. Eisen ◽  
S. Gandhi ◽  
...  

BackgroundThis systematic review addresses the question “What is the optimal targeted therapy for female patients with early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2)–positive breast cancer?”MethodsThe medline and embase databases were searched for the period January 2008 to May 2014. The Standards and Guidelines Evidence directory of cancer guidelines and the Web sites of major guideline organizations were also searched.ResultsSixty publications relevant to the targeted therapy portion of the systematic review were identified. In four major trials (hera, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-31, North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831, and Breast Cancer International Research Group 006), adjuvant trastuzumab for 1 year was superior in disease-free survival (dfs) and overall survival (os) to no trastuzumab; trastuzumab showed no benefit in one trial (pacs 04). A shorter duration of trastuzumab (less than 1 year compared with 1 year) was evaluated, with mixed results for dfs: one trial showed superiority (finher), one trial could not demonstrate noninferiority (phare), another trial showed equivalent results (E 2198), and one trial is still ongoing (persephone). Longer trastuzumab duration (hera: 2 years vs. 1 year) showed no improvement in dfs or os and a higher rate of cardiac events. Newer her2-targeted agents (lapatinib, pertuzumab, T-DM1, neratinib) have been or are still being evaluated in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials, either by direct comparison with trastuzumab alone or combined with trastuzumab. In the neoadjuvant setting (neoaltto, GeparQuinto, Neosphere), trastuzumab alone or in combination with another anti-her2 agent (lapatinib, pertuzumab) was compared with either lapatinib or pertuzumab alone and showed superior or equivalent rates of pathologic complete response. In the adjuvant setting, lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab, compared with trastuzumab alone (altto) or with placebo (teach), was not superior in dfs. The results of the completed aphinity trial, evaluating the role of dual her2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, are highly anticipated. Ongoing trials are evaluating trastuzumab as a single agent without adjuvant chemotherapy (respect) and in patients with low her2 expression (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-47).ConclusionsTaking into consideration disease characteristics and patient preference, 1 year of trastuzumab should be offered to all patients with her2-positive breast cancer who are receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Cardiac function should be regularly assessed in this patient population.


The Breast ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 203-210
Author(s):  
Paul Stewart ◽  
Phillip Blanchette ◽  
Prakesh S. Shah ◽  
Xiang Y. Ye ◽  
R. Gabriel Boldt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document