Community-Based Substance Use Prevention

Community-based substance use prevention involves changing the community context to reduce the prevalence of substance use among community members. The specific actions taken to prevent substance use will vary depending on the initiative but should include activities that target community-level factors that influence substance use, as well as the implementation of specific, evidence-based policies and programs that reach as many individuals as possible in the community. Many community-based prevention efforts are led by coalitions of community members. Ideally, these coalitions will include representation from diverse groups and organizations and comprise all stakeholders concerned about substance use. The use of broad-based coalitions helps ensure that prevention efforts are community-specific, responsive to community needs, and culturally relevant. Participation by community stakeholders and organizations also increases the likelihood that prevention programs are implemented in multiple contexts, reach large numbers of individuals in order to achieve community-level reductions in substance use, and can be sustained over time. Coalitions can also work to change local policies, regulations, and/or ordinances to reduce all community members’ access to substances and opportunities to use them. Community-based prevention can be very challenging, especially in under-resourced communities. In any community, it can be difficult to recruit community members to volunteer to participate in such initiatives and to sustain their interest over time. In addition, maintaining active coalitions, enacting policy changes, and implementing prevention programs requires significant human and financial resources. Communities are also likely to need technical support and ongoing consultation from researchers to help them plan, implement, and evaluate the success of their efforts. Despite these difficulties, some community-based prevention efforts have been demonstrated as effective in reducing substance use/abuse. Although these interventions vary in their complexity and mechanisms for achieving change, common features of successful community-based approaches include the following: (1) clear definition of the specific problem(s) to be prevented; (2) involvement of community members, often through broad-based coalitions; (3) assessment of community-specific needs and resources; (4) implementation of prevention programs, practices, and policies to address these needs; and (5) monitoring of these activities over time to ensure their effectiveness and sustainability. By following these steps and using interventions that have prior evidence of effectiveness from well-conducted research studies, communities should be able to achieve significant reduction in community rates of substance use.

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-209
Author(s):  
Flavio F. Marsiglia ◽  
Stephanie L. Ayers ◽  
Danielle Robbins ◽  
Julie Nagoshi ◽  
Adrienne Baldwin-White ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Chinman ◽  
Gordon Hannah ◽  
Abraham Wandersman ◽  
Patricia Ebener ◽  
Sarah Hunter ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Dickerson ◽  
Jennifer Parker ◽  
Carrie Johnson ◽  
Ryan A. Brown ◽  
Elizabeth D'Amico

Abstract Background: Although the majority of American Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) reside in urban areas, there are very few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing culturally centered substance use prevention interventions for this population. Methods: We describe methods employed to recruit and retain urban AI/AN adolescents into a RCT, which was focused on testing the potential benefits of a substance use prevention intervention for this population. We also report challenges encountered in recruitment and retention of participants and strategies employed addressing these challenges. Data collection occurred from August 2014 to October 2017. Results: We partnered with two community-based organizations in different cities in California. We utilized AI/AN recruiters from communities, placed flyers in community-based organizations, and asked organizations to post flyers on their web and social media sites. We also offered gift cards for participants. Our initial recruitment and retention model was moderately successful; however, we encountered five main challenges: 1) transportation, 2) increasing trust and interest, 3) adding research sites, 4) getting the word out about the project, and 5) getting youth to complete follow-up surveys. Strategies employed to overcome transportation challenges included shortening the number of sessions, offering sessions on both weekends and weekdays, and increasing bus tokens and transportation options. We hired more staff from AI/AN communities, added more research sites from our previously established relationships, and were more pro-active in getting the word out on the project in AI/AN communities. We also utilized more field tracking, and emailed and mailed survey invitations to reach more participants for their follow-up surveys. Because of our efforts, we were nearly able to reach our initial recruitment and retention goals. Conclusions: By identifying challenges and employing culturally appropriate strategies, we were able to collect valuable data on the potential effectiveness of a substance use prevention intervention for urban AI/AN adolescents. Findings from this study assist toward the development of potentially successful strategies to successfully recruit and retain urban AI/AN adolescents in RCTs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mieke Snijder ◽  
Lexine Stapinski ◽  
Briana Lees ◽  
James Ward ◽  
Patricia Conrod ◽  
...  

Abstract This systematic review assessed the current evidence base of substance use prevention programs for Indigenous adolescents in the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The authors investigated (a) the outcomes, type, setting and context of prevention programs; (b) the common components of beneficial prevention programs; and (c) the methodological quality of evaluations of included prevention programs. The authors searched eight peer-reviewed and 20 grey literature databases for studies published between 1 January 1990 and 31 August 2017. Data extracted included type of program (culturally adapted, culture-based or unadapted), the setting (school, community, family or multi-setting), delivery (computerised or traditional), context (Indigenous-specific or multi-cultural environment) and common components of the programs. Program evaluation methodologies were critically appraised against standardised criteria. This review identified 26 eligible studies. Substance use prevention programs for Indigenous youth led to reductions in substance use frequency and intention to use; improvements in substance-related knowledge, attitudes and resistance strategies; and delay in substance use initiation. Key elements of beneficial programs included substance use education, skills development, cultural knowledge enhancement and community involvement in program development. Five programs were rated as methodologically strong, seven were moderate and fourteen were weak. Prevention programs have the potential to reduce substance use among Indigenous adolescents, especially when they are developed in partnership with Indigenous people. However, more rigorously conducted evaluation trials are required to strengthen the evidence base.


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 101513
Author(s):  
Caroline B.R. Evans ◽  
Katie Cotter Stalker ◽  
Mary Ellen Brown

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (3) ◽  
pp. e20192747
Author(s):  
Melissa Tremblay ◽  
Lola Baydala ◽  
Maria Khan ◽  
Cheryl Currie ◽  
Kirstyn Morley ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 541-559
Author(s):  
Sarah Morton ◽  
Karl O’Brien ◽  
Laura O’Reilly

Abstract This paper considers the role of the boxing training and mentoring in the context of the change processes for participants engaging in a twenty-week community based integrated fitness and education substance use rehabilitation programme. The study took place in an urban community in Dublin, Ireland within the context of neo-liberal systems of regulation and control of community based organizations. Focus group interviews with participants were carried out at midway (n = 17) and on completion (n = 14) of the programme and with practitioners (n = 8) midway and on completion of the programme. Transcripts were coded and themes associated with the participants’ experience of the programme and its interface with the wider community context: building relationships; physical and emotional impact of boxing skills training; boxing skills training and gender; understanding the mentoring role. The positive attributes associated with the ‘boxer’ identity has the potential to provide an alternative to ‘the addict’ identity within socially disadvantaged communities. It is argued that the boxing gym, particularly when nested within a range of educational and emotional supports, can become an empowering setting within a community. The coaching approach has the potential to challenge gendered norms in relation to sport and fitness, while also supporting participants to utilize their physical bodies with intent and focus. The inclusion of programme mentors is an important consideration for substance use rehabilitation programmes, especially within communities characterized by exclusion and isolation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document