192. Tolerability Outcomes of Multi-drug Antibiotic Treatment for Pulmonary Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Disease due to Mycobacterium avium Complex in U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries with Bronchiectasis

Abstract Background Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), most frequently Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), cause increasingly common pulmonary infections. Treatment interruptions and early discontinuation are common in MAC therapy, but population-based data on treatment outcomes are severely lacking. We examined tolerability outcomes of guideline-based 3-drug therapies (GBT) targeted for pulmonary MAC infection. Methods Among beneficiaries with bronchiectasis (ICD-9-CM 494.0 or 494.1) in U.S. Medicare data (01/2006 – 12/2014), we identified first-time MAC GBT therapy users, excluding those with cystic fibrosis, HIV, or a history of organ transplant. MAC GBT was defined as an overlapping prescription of ≥ 28-day supply of a macrolide, ethambutol and rifamycin. Using Cox regression methods, we compared time-to-regimen change or discontinuation within 12 months of therapy start in the following groups: 1) azithromycin-ethambutol-rifamycin vs. clarithromycin-ethambutol-rifamycin; 2) macrolide-ethambutol-rifampin vs. macrolide-ethambutol-rifabutin; and 3) azithromycin-ethambutol-rifampin vs. clarithromycin-ethambutol-rifabutin. Results We identified 4,626 GBT therapy users (mean 77.9 years [s.d. 6.1], female [77.7%], and non-Hispanic white [87.2%]). Overall, the rate of regimen change or discontinuation was higher in the clarithromycin-based regimens compared to azithromycin-containing regimens, and in rifabutin-containing regimens compared to rifampin-containing regimens. The rate of drug regimen change or discontinuation was 65% greater in the clarithromycin-ethambutol-rifabutin group compared to the azithromycin-ethambutol-rifampin group (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.43, 1.64) (Table 1, Figure 1). Conclusion Azithromycin-based regimens and rifampin-containing regimens were less likely to be changed or discontinued within 12 months of therapy compared to clarithromycin-based regimens and rifabutin-containing regimens, respectively. More research is needed to identify factors associated with early treatment change or discontinuation. Disclosures Emily Henkle, PhD, MPH, AN2 (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)Zambon (Advisor or Review Panel member) Theodore K. Marras, MD, Astra Zeneca (Speaker’s Bureau)Insmed (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Novartis (Speaker’s Bureau)RedHill (Consultant)Spero (Consultant) Kevin L. Winthrop, MD, MPH, Insmed (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Paratek (Consultant)RedHill (Consultant)Spero (Consultant) Kevin L. Winthrop, MD, MPH, Insmed (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Paratek (Consultant)RedHill Biopharma (Consultant)Spero (Consultant)

Download Full-text

Successful treatment of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related Mycobacterium avium complex disease with a multiple drug regimen including amikacin

Archives of Internal Medicine ◽

10.1001/archinte.151.3.582 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 151 (3) ◽

pp. 582-585 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

C. A. Benson

Keyword(s):

Mycobacterium Avium ◽

Successful Treatment ◽

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ◽

Mycobacterium Avium Complex ◽

Complex Disease ◽

Drug Regimen ◽

Multiple Drug ◽

Acquired Immunodeficiency ◽

Immunodeficiency Syndrome ◽

Mycobacterium Avium Complex Disease

Download Full-text

Successful Treatment of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome—Related Mycobacterium avium Complex Disease With a Multiple Drug Regimen Including Amikacin

Archives of Internal Medicine ◽

10.1001/archinte.1991.00400030116021 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 151 (3) ◽

pp. 582 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Constance A. Benson

Keyword(s):

Mycobacterium Avium ◽

Successful Treatment ◽

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ◽

Mycobacterium Avium Complex ◽

Complex Disease ◽

Drug Regimen ◽

Multiple Drug ◽

Acquired Immunodeficiency ◽

Immunodeficiency Syndrome ◽

Mycobacterium Avium Complex Disease

Download Full-text

Efficacy of triple drug regimen of amikacin, ethambutol and rifabutin in AIDS patients with symptomatic mycobacterium avium complex infection

Journal of Infection ◽

10.1016/0163-4453(93)96872-n ◽

1993 ◽

Vol 26 (1) ◽

pp. 67-70 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Christina Jorup-Rönström ◽

Inger Julander ◽

Björn Petrini

Keyword(s):

Mycobacterium Avium ◽

Mycobacterium Avium Complex ◽

Drug Regimen ◽

Aids Patients ◽

Mycobacterium Avium Complex Infection

Download Full-text

Mycobacterium avium Complex: Addressing Gaps in Diagnosis and Management

The Journal of Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/infdis/jiaa354 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 222 (Supplement_4) ◽

pp. S199-S211

Author(s):

Charles L Daley ◽

Kevin L Winthrop

Keyword(s):

Pulmonary Disease ◽

Mycobacterium Avium ◽

Mycobacterium Avium Complex ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Research Priorities ◽

Drug Regimen ◽

Common Species ◽

New Drugs ◽

Routes Of Administration

Abstract Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous in the environment and an important cause of disease. The most common species causing pulmonary disease are members of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). MAC pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) can be chronic, debilitating, costly, and associated with a high mortality. However, MAC diagnoses are often delayed due to the nonspecific presentation of MAC-PD and radiological findings that overlap with other pulmonary diseases. Patients with risk factors and who meet the diagnostic criteria—which include clinical, radiological, and microbiologic criteria—should be considered for treatment. Diagnosis requires 2 or more positive sputum cultures or 1 bronchoscopic specimen culture. The recommendation for those who are treated is a 3-drug regimen including macrolide, rifamycin, and ethambutol that is continued for 12 months beyond sputum culture conversion to negative. MAC-PD is difficult to treat, with frequent drug-related side effects and suboptimal treatment outcomes. Refractory and recurrent disease is common, leading to lifelong follow-up of patients. There are limited treatment options for patients with macrolide-resistant or refractory disease. Amikacin liposome inhalation suspension is recommended for treatment-refractory patients whose cultures remain positive after 6 months of guideline-based therapy. Among the research priorities to improve patient outcomes and quality of life are developing new, more rapid diagnostic tests, investigating biomarkers associated with disease progression, and identifying new drugs and routes of administration as well as new, shorter, and better-tolerated regimens.

Download Full-text

900. Switching to DTG/3TC Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) Is Non-inferior to Continuing a TAF-Based Regimen (TBR) in Maintaining Virologic Suppression Through 144 Weeks (TANGO Study)

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1095 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S541-S541

Author(s):

Olayemi Osiyemi ◽

Faïza Ajana ◽

Fiona Bisshop ◽

Stéphane De Wit ◽

Joaquín Portilla ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Virologic Failure ◽

Panel Member ◽

Drug Regimen ◽

Fixed Dose ◽

People Living With Hiv ◽

Virologic Suppression ◽

Research Support ◽

Review Panel ◽

Good Tolerability ◽

Material Support

Abstract Background DTG/3TC is a complete 2-drug regimen (2DR) for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Non-inferior virologic efficacy has been proven over 3 years in treatment-naive people living with HIV (PLWH) and 2 years in a stable switch setting. Methods TANGO, a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority study, evaluates efficacy and safety of switching to DTG/3TC in PLWH who are virologically suppressed ( > 6 months, no prior virologic failure [VF], no major NRTI/INSTI resistance) vs remaining on a 3- or 4-drug TAF-based regimen (TBR), stratified by baseline 3rd agent class. Week 144 analyses assessed non-inferiority (NI) with a 4% NI margin for Snapshot virologic failure (VF) and 8% for virologic success (VS; FDA Snapshot algorithm, intention-to-treat–exposed [ITT-E] population). Results Of 741 randomized/exposed pts (DTG/3TC: 369; TBR: 372), most pts entered the study on EVG/c (66%). For Week 144 Snapshot VF, switching to DTG/3TC was non-inferior to continuing TBR in the ITT-E analysis: 0.3% vs 1.3%; adjusted difference (95% CI): −1.1% (−2.4%, 0.2%) and superior to TBR in the per-protocol analysis: 0% vs 1.1%; adjusted difference: −1.1% (−2.3, −0.0); P=0.044 (2-sided). Snapshot VS was high in both arms and demonstrated non-inferiority (Table). Zero pts on DTG/3TC and 3 (0.8%) on TBR met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria with no resistance observed. Zero pts on DTG/3TC and 6 (1.6%) on TBR discontinued for lack of efficacy. Overall AE rates were similar between arms (Table). TC, LDL-C, and triglycerides improved with DTG/3TC, HDL-C improved with TBR, with no difference in TC/HDL-C ratio between arms. Changes in eGFR (cystatin C) and proximal tubular function marker were similar across arms. Adjusted mean change from BL in weight was 2.2 and 1.7 kg in the DTG/3TC and TBR arms, respectively, and proportion of pts with > 10% weight increase was similar across arms (13% and 12%, respectively). Table. Efficacy and Key Safety Results for the ITT-E and Safety Population Conclusion Switching to the 2-drug regimen of DTG/3TC from a TAF-based 3- or 4-drug regimen resulted in high, non-inferior efficacy with zero confirmed virologic withdrawals and good tolerability over 3 years of treatment. DTG/3TC 2DR is a robust switch option with durable efficacy, good safety and tolerability, and a high barrier to resistance. Disclosures Olayemi Osiyemi, M.D, Gilead (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Merck (Advisor or Review Panel member)ViiV Healthcare (Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau) Fiona Bisshop, MBBBS, Gilead (Grant/Research Support)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support) Stéphane De Wit, MD, Gilead (Grant/Research Support)Janssen (Grant/Research Support)Merck Sharpe & Dohme (Grant/Research Support)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support) Joaquín Portilla, MD, AbbVie (Other Financial or Material Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support)Janssen (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support)Merck Sharpe & Dohme (Other Financial or Material Support)ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support) Jean-Pierre Routy, MD, FRCPC, ViiV Healthcare (Grant/Research Support) Mounir Ait-Khaled, PhD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Keith Pappa, PharmD, Glaxo Smith Kline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Ruolan Wang, Master of Science, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Peter Leone, MD, viiv healthcare (Employee) Jonathan Wright, MSc, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Brian Wynne, MD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee, Shareholder, I have shares in GSK, the part owner of ViiV) Jean A. van Wyk, MB,ChB, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Michael Aboud, MBChB, MRCP, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Kimberly Smith, MD, GlaxoSmithKline (Shareholder)ViiV Healthcare (Employee)

Download Full-text

1399. Clarithromycin–Rifampin-based Treatment for Non-tuberculous Mycobacterial Infections in Immunocompromised Patients Who Require Concomitant CYP-Metabolized Medications

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1591 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S784-S784

Author(s):

Isabel H Gonzalez-Bocco ◽

Muneerah M Aleissa ◽

Matthew Cheng ◽

Jennifer Manne-Goehler ◽

Francisco M Marty

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Treatment Guidelines ◽

Panel Member ◽

Positive Culture ◽

Good Alternative ◽

Drug Regimen ◽

Current Treatment ◽

Review Panel ◽

Cyp Induction ◽

Immunocompromised Hosts

Abstract Background Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are causes of pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease that frequently affect immunocompromised hosts (ICH). Current treatment guidelines recommend a macrolide-based, multi-drug regimen that includes rifampin. Rifampin is a potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inducer, which often results in drug-drug interactions in ICH receiving multiple CYP substrates. One way to mitigate rifampin’s CYP induction is to utilize clarithromycin, a CYP inhibitor, as the accompanying macrolide. We evaluated the incidence of NTM treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in patients who received a clarithromycin-based regimen compared to patients who received an azithromycin-based regimen. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of NTM infection in 30 immunocompromised adults. All participants had a positive culture for a NTM and had received a rifamycin (rifampin or rifabutin) with a macrolide (azithromycin or clarithromycin) for treatment at Brigham and Women’s Hospital between 01/01/2011-10/18/2020 or Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 06/03/2015-07/01/2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of NTM treatment-related AEs in patients who received a clarithromycin-based regimen compared to those who received an azithromycin-based regimen. Results There were no significant differences in the reasons for discontinuation of NTM treatment or 90-day mortality between groups. The number of AEs possibly related to NTM treatment were similar in patients who received a clarithromycin-based regimen and those who received an azithromycin-based one (10/13 vs. 14/17; p=0.73). The most common AE was liver function test abnormalities (Table 1). Additionally, the proportion of patients requiring dose adjustments for interacting medications and patients with out-of-range tacrolimus levels were similar between the two groups (23.1% vs. 29.4%; p=0.76 and 8.0% vs. 6.0%; p=1.00, respectively). Table 1: Adverse events Conclusion A clarithromycin-based regimen for NTM treatment was safe and well tolerated in our patient population. This combination provides a good alternative for patients requiring medications that are CYP substrates, or those who cannot tolerate azithromycin. Disclosures Matthew Cheng, MD, GEn1E Lifesciences (Advisor or Review Panel member)Kanvas Biosciences (Board Member, Shareholder)nplex biosciences (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Download Full-text