scholarly journals 1815. Effects of Syndrome-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Prospective Audit and Feedback Interventions on Antimicrobial Use in an Urban Community Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S515-S515
Author(s):  
Alfredo J Mena Lora ◽  
Martin Cortez ◽  
Rick Chu ◽  
Ella Li ◽  
Scott Borgetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Urban Community ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Feedback Interventions ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

scholarly journals 1059. Impact of a Syndrome-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention on Anti-Pseudomonal β-Lactam Use, C. difficile Rates and Cost in an Urban Community Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S374-S375
Author(s):  
Alfredo J Mena Lora ◽  
Martin Cortez ◽  
Ella Li ◽  
Lawrence Sanchez ◽  
Rochelle Bello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Urban Community ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The use of anti-Pseudomonal β-lactam (APBL) agents has significantly increased in the past decade, carrying higher costs and contributing to antimicrobial pressure. Antimicrobial stewardship (ASP) can promote evidence-based antimicrobial selection and mitigate excess APBL use. We implemented a comprehensive ASP with syndrome-based prospective audit and feedback (PAF) at an urban community hospital. The goal of this study is to assess the impact of syndrome-based PAF on APBL use, C. difficile rates and cost. Methods ASP with all CDC core elements was implemented at a 151-bed community hospital in October 2017. Syndrome-based guidelines and PAF was established and overseen via direct communication with an ID physician. Days of therapy (DOT), cost and C. difficile rates were assessed 12 months before and after ASP. DOT for APBL and non-APBL utilization was tabulated by unit and paired t-test performed. Results Most cases reviewed by PAF (51%) were represented in our syndrome-based treatment guidelines (Figure 1). Soft tissue (33%) and intra-abdominal (24%) infections were the most common syndromes. Change to guideline was the most common PAF intervention (62%) followed by de-escalation (30%). At 12 months, total DOT/1,000 increased (392.5 vs. 404) while the proportion of parenteral antimicrobials used decreased (71% vs. 65%). Antibiotic expenditures decreased by 23%, with a reduction in APBL of 20% and non-APBL of 10% (Table 1). Statistically significant reductions APBL use in non-ICU settings (P = 0.0139) and statistically significant increases in non-APBL in ICU settings occurred (P = 0.0001) (Figure 2 and 3). C difficile rates decreased from 21% (3.27 vs. 2.56). Conclusion Syndrome-based PAF was successfully implemented. A reduction in APBL use was seen in non-ICU settings, where evidence-based de-escalation may be more feasible. APBL use remained high in the ICU but was guideline consistent. A rise in non-APBL use also occurred. Certain critical illness syndromes warrant APBLs, but PAF may promote culture-directed and syndrome-specific treatments. ASP increased guideline-based therapy and contributed to decreased broad-spectrum antimicrobial use, antimicrobial expenditures and C difficile rates. Syndrome based PAF can be successfully implemented in community settings. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Prescription Patterns in a Pediatric Tertiary-Care Unit in Thailand 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (9) ◽  
pp. 1476-1482
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Prescription Patterns ◽  
Point Prevalence Survey ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

Background: Surveillance data is an essential part of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). Objective: To describe and compare prescription patterns of antibiotics after a 3-years implementation of an ASP using prospective audit and feedback. Materials and Methods: The authors conducted a point prevalence survey (PPS) of antibiotic prescriptions at a 200-bed pediatric unit at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. A standardized study protocol from the Global Antimicrobial Resistance, Prescribing, and the Efficacy in Neonates and Children (GARPEC) project was used. The authors reviewed medical charts of hospitalized children of less than 18 years of age, using a point prevalence method on the 15 of February, May, August, and November 2019. Endpoints measures included rate of antimicrobial prescriptions and type of antimicrobial use, stratified by neonatal and pediatric ward types. Rate of antimicrobial prescriptions will be compared with historical data form PPS in the same institute collected in 2016. Results: In 2019, the medical records of 269 neonates and 409 children hospitalized were reviewed. The proportion of children receiving antibiotics in neonatal units overall was 18.6% (95% CI 14.1 to 23.8), of which ampicillin or gentamicin (52.0%) was the most common regimen. Rate of antibiotic prescriptions in general pediatric wards was 46.5%, with third generation cephalosporins being the most used antibiotics. Prescription rate in the oncology ward was 52.9% with antipseudomonal agents or meropenem being the most prescribed antibiotics. Prescription rates in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) was 88.9%, with meropenem being the most used antibiotic. Compared to a previous PPS study in 2016, prevalence of antimicrobial use was higher in general pediatric wards at 46.5% versus 37.2% (p=0.02) and PICU at 88.9% versus 67.7% (p=0.007). Conclusion: The prevalence rates of antimicrobial use in pediatric wards increased despite implementation of a prospective audit and feedback antibiotic stewardship program. Other measures are needed to reduce the unnecessary prescriptions. Keywords: Antimicrobial; Antimicrobial stewardship program; Pediatric; Point prevalence survey

scholarly journals When Antimicrobial Stewardship Isn′t Watching: The Educational Impact of Critical Care Prospective Audit and Feedback

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitra Fleming ◽  
Karim F. Ali ◽  
John Matelski ◽  
Ryan D'Sa ◽  
Jeff Powis
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Educational Impact ◽  
Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

Abstract Prospective audit and feedback (PAF) is an effective strategy to optimize antimicrobial use in the critical care setting, yet whether skills gained during PAF influence future antimicrobial prescribing is uncertain. This multisite study demonstrates that knowledge learned during PAF is translated and incorporated into the practice of critical care physicians even when not supported by an antimicrobial stewardship program.

scholarly journals A Novel Metric to Monitor the Influence of Antimicrobial Stewardship Activities

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (06) ◽  
pp. 721-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Livorsi ◽  
Erin O’Leary ◽  
Tamra Pierce ◽  
Lindsey Reese ◽  
Katharina L. van Santen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Infectious Disease Physician ◽  
Antimicrobial Prescribing ◽  
National Healthcare Safety Network ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
Antimicrobial Administration

The antimicrobial use (AU) option within the National Healthcare Safety Network summarizes antimicrobial prescribing data as a standardized antimicrobial administration ratio (SAAR). A hospital’s antimicrobial stewardship program found that greater involvement of an infectious disease physician in prospective audit and feedback procedures was associated with reductions in SAAR values across multiple antimicrobial categories. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:721–723

scholarly journals 83. Staff Pharmacist-driven Prospective Audit and Feedback at a Community Hospital: Assessing an all Hands on Deck Approach to Antimicrobial Stewardship

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S58-S59
Author(s):  
Casey J Dempsey ◽  
Natasha Weiner ◽  
Michele Riccardi ◽  
Kristin Linder
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Small Community ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Feedback Program

Abstract Background Facilities with robust antimicrobial stewardship programs often have infectious disease (ID) pharmacists with devoted time to complete antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Smaller facilities with limited resources or lacking ID pharmacists, may encounter challenges meeting antimicrobial stewardship regulatory requirements. The goal of this study is to assess the impact of a staff pharmacist-driven prospective audit and feedback program in a small community hospital. Methods A pre- and post-intervention study was performed to assess the primary outcome of days of therapy per 1,000 patient days (DOT) for targeted antimicrobials (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefepime, ceftazidime). Secondary outcomes were antibiotic expenditures and rates of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Results Significant decreases in DOT were observed for piperacillin/tazobactam (29.88 vs. 9.25; p < 0.001), ciprofloxacin (23.22 vs. 9.97; p < 0.001), levofloxacin (11.2 vs. 5.07; p < 0.001) and overall antipseudomonal DOT (62.91 vs. 51.67; p < 0.001). There was no difference in ceftazidime DOT (8.75 vs. 6.47; p= 0.083) and an increase in cefepime DOT (20.47 vs. 34.35; p < 0.001). A trend towards decreased rates of CDI was seen (4.9/10,000 patient days vs. 2.64/10,000 patient days; p= 0.931). There were significant decreases in antibiotic expenditures for piperacillin/tazobactam ($52,498 vs. $10,937; p < 0.001), levofloxacin ($2,168 vs. $672; p < 0.001), ciprofloxacin ($6,700 vs. $1,954; p < 0.001). Lower expenditures for ceftazidime were seen ($9,952 vs. $7,457; p= 0.29). Cefepime expenditures increased ($25,638 vs. $40,097; p= 0.001). An overall decrease in the expenditure for the targeted antibiotics was seen ($95,715 vs. $62,837; p < 0.001). Conclusion Implementation of a staff pharmacist-driven prospective authorization and feedback program led to a significant decrease in DOT and antibiotic expenditures for several targeted antibiotics and a trend towards decreased rates of CDI. Despite increased DOT and expenditures for cefepime, there was an overall decrease amongst the targeted antibiotics. With proper implementation, staff pharmacists can significantly benefit antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Computer-Assisted Antimicrobial Recommendations for Optimal Therapy: Analysis of Prescribing Errors in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 857-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Schwartz ◽  
Kevin W. McConeghy ◽  
Rosie D. Lyles ◽  
Ulysses Wu ◽  
Robert C. Glowacki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Clinician Education ◽  
Feedback Interventions ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback

Clinician education and prospective audit and feedback interventions, deployed separately and concurrently, did not reduce antimicrobial use errors or rates compared to a control group of general medicine inpatients at our public hospital. Additional research is needed to define the optimal scope and intensity of hospital antimicrobial stewardship interventions.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:857–859

scholarly journals 757. Impact of a Sepsis Improvement Team with Prospective Audit and Feedback on SEP-1 Core Measure Adherence in an Urban Community Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S338-S338
Author(s):  
Alfredo J Mena Lora ◽  
Sue Sim ◽  
Sherrie Spencer ◽  
Yolanda Coleman ◽  
Candice Krill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Hospital ◽  
Urban Community ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Immediate Feedback ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Core Measure ◽  
Prospective Audit And Feedback ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Improvement Team

Abstract Background Adherence to the CMS sepsis core measure (SEP-1) has been a challenge for facilities nationwide. Checklists, electronic medical record (EMR) alerts and order sets have been shown to improve compliance. We implemented a comprehensive SEP-1 guideline with order sets, checklists and EMR alerts at an urban community hospital. Subsequently, a SEP-1 improvement team with an infectious disease physician and a nurse led a prospective audit and feedback (PAF) program to help improve adherence and reduce errors. We seek to understand the impact of PAF on SEP-1 compliance. Methods Quasi-experimental pre- and post-intervention study of SEP-1 compliance at a 151-bed urban community hospital from January 2015 to December 2018. PAF intervention was started on July 2017. Cases were reviewed, SEP-1 failures identified, and feedback given to nurses and clinicians involved within 48 hours of admission. Gaps in adherence are identified, education given, and corrective actions taken. SEP-1 adherence before and after PAF implementation was reviewed. Results A total of 307 cases met the SEP-1 inclusion criteria. PAF was successfully implemented. There were 169 SEP-1 cases before and 138 after implementation of PAF. The success rate increased from 44% to 52% with PAF (Figure 1). The most common reasons for failure were initial and repeat lactic acid on both groups (Figure 2). Conclusion Prospective audit and feedback for SEP-1 improved compliance rates at our facility. Prospective audit can help identify core measure failures early and provide immediate feedback to clinicians, nurses and laboratory personnel. Immediate feedback by the SEP-1 improvement team may help increase SEP-1 awareness, strengthen existing protocols and promote a culture of safety. SEP-1 is a complex core measure that may transition to pay-for-performance. An ID physician-led SEP-1 improvement team with PAF may be an area for future value-based care opportunities for ID physicians. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document