scholarly journals How Persistent Low Expected Returns Alter Optimal Life Cycle Saving, Investment, and Retirement Behavior

Author(s):  
Vanya Horneff ◽  
Raimond Maurer ◽  
Olivia S. Mitchell

This chapter explores how an environment of persistent low returns influences saving, investing, and retirement behaviors, compared to what in the past had been conceived of as ‘normal’ financial conditions. Using a calibrated life cycle dynamic model with realistic tax, minimum distribution, and social security benefit rules, we can mimic the large peak at the earliest claiming age at 62 that is seen in the data. Also in line with the evidence, our baseline results show a smaller second peak at the (system-defined) Full Retirement Age of 66. In the context of a zero-return environment, we show that workers will optimally devote more of their savings to non-retirement accounts and less to 401(k) accounts, since the relative appeal of investing in taxable versus tax-qualified retirement accounts is lower in a low return setting. Finally, we show that people claim social security benefits later in a low interest rate environment.

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARIE-EVE LACHANCE

AbstractThis paper analytically solves a life-cycle model that compares traditional and Roth retirement accounts. It includes realistic features such as tax deductibility of contributions and taxation of withdrawals, tax bracket structure with deductions, taxation of Social Security benefits, and tax risk at retirement. With current taxes, choosing a traditional account over a Roth creates small welfare losses in only a few cases, largely for those with higher incomes and pensions who are subject to the taxation of Social Security benefits. We also investigate tax variability and find that diversified strategies offer only small risk reduction benefits in our illustrations.


2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajin Lee

This article argues that wealth uncertainty influences when couples choose to retire. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, I show that wives delay retirement when their husbands retire following a job loss. This effect is stronger when husbands are the primary earners, and couples are relatively poorer. This provides evidence of intra-household insurance that mitigates the impact of an unexpected earnings shock. I find that wives tend to delay retirement only until they become eligible for social security. This suggests that social security benefits can relax households’ budget constraints and allow wives to join their husbands in retirement.


Author(s):  
Frank Caliendo ◽  
Allen B. Atkins

President Bush is in favor of using private retirement accounts to partially replace the current pay-as-you-go social security program.  We use a simple life-cycle model to analyze whether or not private accounts would benefit workers.  "Cash equivalents" are calculated under different assumptions to see how much a worker would be willing to pay to participate in the private account program.  In most circumstances, workers would benefit from the private account program.  Only when market rates of return are very low or a person expects to live for a very long time does the current pay-as-you-go system give a greater present value to a worker.


2018 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 93-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Payne Carter ◽  
William Skimmyhorn

Despite concern about the viability of public retirement programs and potential undersaving for retirement, we still know little about the impact of government provided information on individual behavior. We exploit plausibly exogenous variation in exposure to the world's largest personalized retirement benefits statement from the US Social Security Administration to evaluate the effects of information and encouragement on individual retirement savings decisions. Using three natural experiments between 2011 and 2014 and administrative data, we find no impact of the statements on individual retirement savings in their employer provided retirement accounts.


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. David Ashby ◽  
Darla G. Williams ◽  
Terrye A. Stinson

Traditional analysis on the use of Roth accounts often focuses on the expectations of tax rates in the future. However, tax diversification into tax-free accounts such as the Roth accounts may make sense independent of expectations regarding future tax rates. This is due to the taxation of Social Security benefits and the laws relating to required minimum distributions for traditional retirement accounts. Many taxpayers may find their overall income tax burden lighter in the retirement years by making use of taxable, tax deferred and tax-free investment accounts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document