Chapter XII Farmers: a rule: an exception

Author(s):  
Thomas Hardy
Keyword(s):  

The first public evidence of Bathsheba’s decision to be a farmer in her own person and by proxy no more was her appearance the following market day in the corn-market at Casterbridge. The low though extensive hall supported by beams and pillars and latterly dignified...

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ewens ◽  
Kairong Xiao ◽  
Ting Xu

Significance Through the sale, Reliance mobilised INR1.52trn (USD20.3bn) and became a zero-net-debt company with cash to spare. This marks an inflection point in the conglomerate’s history and could transform India’s digital economy. Impacts There is little public evidence that Reliance can offer complete stand-alone 5G telecommunications. Reliance is well-placed to lead the Indian 5G market. Commercialisation of Indian customers' user data will continue to outpace rules governing their privacy and safety. The new data protection bill is designed to give the government extensive access to raw data on citizens for ‘national security’.


2020 ◽  
pp. 88-118
Author(s):  
Kevin Vallier

A right to freedom of association can both be justified to a diverse public, and exercises of that right help create and sustain social and political trust in the real world. Freedom of association can be justified to multiple points of view, both liberal and illiberal, to protect the pursuit of diverse forms of life. It creates real trust by putting people in contact with other members and with nonmembers. It creates trust for the right reasons because the recognition, protection, and exercise of the right of association serve as public evidence of the trustworthiness of association members and governments that recognize and respect and protect the rights of associations members. Since freedom of association creates trust for the right reasons, it can help arrest falling trust and increasing polarization.


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 30-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narjess Boubakri ◽  
Maher Kooli ◽  
Jean-François L'her

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 709-734
Author(s):  
Jonathan Benney

Political posters, banners, and similar objects are extremely common in China. This article uses political design from contemporary China, particularly emphasizing the government's Chinese Dream campaign, to analyze what at first appears to be a paradox. The subjects of the various campaigns and the language they use are mandated by the central government and promoted through central and local publicity departments. However, the graphic aspects of these campaigns, such as the choice of colours, images, layout, and typeface, are much less strictly controlled, and are decided by local governments or authorities. This makes political design in China decentralized. Decentralized design is inconsistent with the principles of global marketing and with the PRC's reliance on set forms of political discourse, both of which rely on the assumption that uniformity will lead to more effective communication of messages and persuasion of the public. Evidence from local design campaigns indeed shows that Chinese political posters are often designed hastily and without expertise, resulting in strange and unpersuasive images. Despite this, the article shows that decentralized design is not paradoxical. This is largely because the Chinese party-state uses propaganda as a method of "signalling" its overall power, more than as a tool of indoctrination or persuasion about particular topics. The central government's reliance on incentives and metrics to regulate local authorities means that the production of propaganda is also a way in which local governments can signal their loyalty to the Centre.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document