regulatory costs
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

51
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ewens ◽  
Kairong Xiao ◽  
Ting Xu


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-77
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Dvorkin ◽  
Juan M. Sánchez ◽  
Horacio Sapriza ◽  
Emircan Yurdagul

Sovereign debt crises involve debt restructurings characterized by a mix of face value haircuts and maturity extensions. The prevalence of maturity extensions has been hard to reconcile with economic theory. We develop a model of endogenous debt restructuring that captures key facts of sovereign debt and restructuring episodes. While debt dilution pushes for negative maturity extensions, three factors are important in overcoming the effects of dilution and generating maturity extensions upon restructurings: income recovery after default, credit exclusion after restructuring, and regulatory costs of book value haircuts. We employ dynamic discrete choice methods that allow for smoother decision rules, rendering the problem tractable. (JEL E44, F34, F41, H63)



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ewens ◽  
Kairong Xiao ◽  
Ting Xu


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Ewens ◽  
Kairong Xiao ◽  
Ting Xu

Many disclosure and internal governance regulations for U.S. public firms trigger when a firm’s public float exceeds a threshold. Consistent with firms seeking to avoid costly regulation, we document significant bunching around multiple regulatory thresholds introduced from 1992 to 2012. We present a revealed preference estimation strategy that uses this behavior to quantify regulatory costs. Our estimates show that various disclosure and internal governance rules leads to a total compliance cost of 4.3% of the market capitalization for a median U.S. public firm. We apply the estimated costs to firms’ public-private choice and show that regulatory costs significantly impact private firms’ decisions to go public, while have limited effects on public firms’ decisions to go private.



Author(s):  
Jonathan van Senten ◽  
Carole R. Engle ◽  
Bobbi Hudson ◽  
Fred S. Conte


Author(s):  
Wen-Jun Tu ◽  
Xiao-Guang Yue ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
M. James C. Crabbe

In 2016, the issue of the Environmental Protection Tax Law indicated the enhancement of environmental protection in China. This study examines the market reaction to firms in heavy-polluting industries, and the effects of external legal institutional quality and internal environmental disclosure on firm value around the passage of Environmental Protection Tax Law. Using an event study approach coupled with ordinary least square regressions, the researchers find a significantly negative market reaction to firms in heavy-polluting industries, but this negative reaction varies depending on the expected increase in future regulatory costs. Specifically, the above negative reaction is stronger when the firm reveals that itself or its subsidiary belongs to heavy-polluting industry, however it would be mitigated when a firm is in a region with better quality of legal institutions or discloses environmental improvement activities. Overall, the results are consistent with the market perceiving that the environmental protection tax law enacted would increase regulatory costs for firms in heavy-polluting industries, and also show the higher-quality regional legal institutions and more efforts on environmental protection could relieve the market’s pessimism caused by uncertainty.





2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-88
Author(s):  
L. I. Moroz ◽  
◽  
I. B. Khoma ◽  
P. A. Horyslavets ◽  
◽  
...  

The article presents the research and rationale of theoretical issues and applied decisions regarding the influence of enterprises and the mechanism of managing production processes with regeneration (renovation) on the competitiveness. Mathematical tools were developed and methods for calculating basic economic indicators were suggested, namely, the starting factors and direct regulatory costs for materials; the economic and mathematical model of production processes with regeneration was designed, which allows comparing the output of production with the cost of its manufacturing and the improvements of the competitiveness of strategically important enterprises.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document