Assessing Music in Early Childhood

Author(s):  
Maria Runfola

In this chapter, pros and cons of assessing young children’s music skills and content knowledge are explored. An integrative literature review is included as well as a thematic review lending support to core themes. Several reasons were identified as to the importance of promoting student assessment as children participate in early childhood music. Use of music assessments in the classroom and for research should consider practices consistent with musical age as well as chronological age. Increased recognition of the importance of music in total development of the child supports need for effective early childhood assessment systems especially by the music education research community as they continue to gather evidence regarding the utilitarian value of music in early childhood. Researchers need to be aware of environmental factors that may impact early music learning and cognizant of current best practices in music education for early childhood. Researcher-developed criterion measures often are not investigated for quality characteristics, and thus rigorous guidelines for such criterion measures are needed. It appears there are no definitive policy or ethics statements regarding early childhood music assessment but both should be considered vital priorities for the profession. Most likely only those scholars with profound interest in assessment and teachers with deep understanding of the role of assessment in teaching and learning will volunteer to respond. Everything developed in such a national network will be useful, providing we start with clearly defined, intended outcomes and then develop assessments to document student attainment of those musical outcomes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Young

References to neuroscience and the brain now crop up regularly in academic and pedagogical literatures in early childhood music education. In this article, I discuss this recent ‘brainification’ (a term coined by Vandenbroeck) of early childhood music and point out problems and pitfalls that can arise from this current enthusiasm for neuroscience narratives. Concern at the misinterpretation of neuroscientific research in music education, often referred to as neuromyths, has led to a small and important body of literature. This literature is reviewing, analysing and providing summaries of neuroscience in music, correcting misconceptions and clarifying the implications for educational practice. First, I introduce this work and outline its main arguments. However, despite these corrections and clarifications, neuromyths persist. Therefore, I go on to ask why ‐ when the research base is being demonstrated to have many limitations ‐ do certain neuroscientific ideas continue to occupy such a prominent position? The answer I suggest lies in the current context of social media proliferation of information together with the certainty that neuromyth narratives (falsely) promise. I will go on to explain how the prominence of neuromyths goes hand in hand with the current policy environment for early childhood education and care that constructs children as a form of future investment. The article arrives at a number of suggestions for how the problems and pitfalls might be overcome or avoided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document