Quantitative Modeling of Stress and Coping

Author(s):  
Richard W. J. Neufeld ◽  
Bryan Grant

Forms of modeling in the field are described in nontechnical terms. Included are analytical (mathematical), computational (computer simulation, mainly of connectionist networks), and statistical (generic, transcontent data theory, and methods) modeling. Distinctions among modeling forms are stipulated, and each is exposited through the method of illustration, with exemplary prototypes. Potential avenues of integration among complementing types of analytical modeling are identified. Emphasized throughout is the demonstrable need to invoke formal modeling to rigorously address the long-held dynamical nature of the topic domain. It is noted that analytical modeling can disclose otherwise intractable information, including that with implications for stress-related intervention; it can also prescribe its own empirical tests and measures, resembling theory-assessment technology found in longer established scientific disciplines.

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Eschenbeck ◽  
Uwe Heim-Dreger ◽  
Denise Kerkhoff ◽  
Carl-Walter Kohlmann ◽  
Arnold Lohaus ◽  
...  

Abstract. The coping scales from the Stress and Coping Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (SSKJ 3–8; Lohaus, Eschenbeck, Kohlmann, & Klein-Heßling, 2018 ) are subscales of a theoretically based and empirically validated self-report instrument for assessing, originally in the German language, the five strategies of seeking social support, problem solving, avoidant coping, palliative emotion regulation, and anger-related emotion regulation. The present study examined factorial structure, measurement invariance, and internal consistency across five different language versions: English, French, Russian, Spanish, and Ukrainian. The original German version was compared to each language version separately. Participants were 5,271 children and adolescents recruited from primary and secondary schools from Germany ( n = 3,177), France ( n = 329), Russia ( n = 378), the Dominican Republic ( n = 243), Ukraine ( n = 437), and several English-speaking countries such as Australia, Great Britain, Ireland, and the USA (English-speaking sample: n = 707). For the five different language versions of the SSKJ 3–8 coping questionnaire, confirmatory factor analyses showed configural as well as metric and partial scalar invariance (French) or partial metric invariance (English, Russian, Spanish, Ukrainian). Internal consistency coefficients of the coping scales were also acceptable to good. Significance of the results was discussed with special emphasis on cross-cultural research on individual differences in coping.


1986 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 996-996
Author(s):  
Kenneth A. Halroyd
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-291
Author(s):  
Fran C. Dickson

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasmin Nilofer Farooqi
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Schuster ◽  
◽  
B. D. Stein ◽  
L. H. Jaycox ◽  
R. L. Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Kaiseler ◽  
Remco Polman ◽  
Adam Nicholls

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilan H. Meyer ◽  
Sharon Schwartz ◽  
Michael J. Stirratt ◽  
David M. Frost

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document