scholarly journals Neonatal Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age Preterm Infants: Prospective Cohort Analyses

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (suppl_A) ◽  
pp. 37A-37A
Author(s):  
PS Shah ◽  
J Kingdom ◽  
V Shah
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000740
Author(s):  
Netsanet Workneh Gidi ◽  
Robert L Goldenberg ◽  
Assaye K Nigussie ◽  
Elizabeth McClure ◽  
Amha Mekasha ◽  
...  

PurposeThe aim of this study was to assess morbidity and mortality pattern of small for gestational age (SGA) preterm infants in comparison to appropriate for gestational age (AGA) preterm infants of similar gestational age.MethodWe compared neonatal outcomes of 1336, 1:1 matched, singleton SGA and AGA preterm infants based on their gestational age using data from the study ‘Causes of Illness and Death of Preterm Infants in Ethiopia (SIP)’. Data were analysed using SPSS V.23. ORs and 95% CIs and χ2 tests were done, p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultThe majority of the infants (1194, 89%) were moderate to late preterm (32–36 weeks of gestation), 763 (57%) were females. Male preterm infants had higher risk of being SGA than female infants (p<0.001). SGA infants had increased risk of hypoglycaemic (OR and 95% CI 1.6 (1.2 to 2.0), necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) 2.3 (1.2 to 4.1), polycythaemia 3.0 (1.6 to 5.4), late-onset neonatal sepsis (LOS) 3.6 (1.1 to 10.9)) and prolonged hospitalisation 2.9 (2.0 to 4.2). The rates of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), apnoea and mortality were similar in the SGA and AGA groups.ConclusionNeonatal complications such as hypoglycaemic, NEC, LOS, polycythaemia and prolonged hospitalisation are more common in SGA infants, while rates of RDS and mortality are similar in SGA and AGA groups. Early recognition of SGA status, high index of suspicion and screening for complications associated and timely intervention to prevent complications need due consideration.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (02) ◽  
pp. 87-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangming Qiu ◽  
Abhay Lodha ◽  
Prakesh Shah ◽  
K. Sankaran ◽  
Mary Seshia ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colm P Travers ◽  
Reese H Clark ◽  
Alan R Spitzer ◽  
Abhik Das ◽  
Thomas J Garite ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Silvia M. Lobmaier ◽  
Oliver Graupner ◽  
Javier U. Ortiz ◽  
Bernhard Haller ◽  
Christina Ried ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To describe the perinatal outcome of a prospective cohort of late-onset small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses and to test adverse perinatal outcome (APO) prediction using Doppler measurements. Methods Singleton pregnancies from 32 weeks with suspicion of SGA (followed-up each 2 weeks) and randomly selected healthy controls at a university hospital were included. The whole SGA group was divided into the FGR subgroup or SGA percentile 3–10 subgroup. The following Doppler measurements were evaluated prospectively: umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery (MCA) PI, cerebro-placental ratio (CPR), and mean uterine artery (mUtA) PI. APO was defined as arterial cord blood pH ≤ 7.15 and/or 5-minute Apgar ≤ 7 and/or emergency operative delivery and/or admission to the neonatal unit. Induction of labor was indicated according to a stage-based protocol. Results A total of 149 SGA and 143 control fetuses were included. The number of operative deliveries was similar between both groups (control: 29 %, SGA: 28 %), especially the cesarean delivery rate after the onset of labor (11 % vs. 10 %). Most SGA cases ended up in induction of labor (61 % vs. 31 %, p < 0.001). The areas under the curve (AUC) for APO prediction were similar using the last UA PI, MCA PI, CPR, and mUtA PI and barely reached 0.60. The AUC was best for the FGR subgroup, using the minimal CPR or maximum mUtA PI z-score of all longitudinal measurements (AUC = 0.63). Conclusion SGA fetuses do not have a higher rate of operative delivery if managed according to a risk stratification protocol. Prediction of APO is best for SGA and FGR using the “worst” CPR or mUtA PI but it remains moderate.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. S24-S25
Author(s):  
Eva van der Vlugt ◽  
Petra Verburg ◽  
Shalem Leemaqz ◽  
Lesley Mccowan ◽  
Lucilla Poston ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1263-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany Aly ◽  
Zahraa Ez El Din ◽  
Reem M. Soliman ◽  
Indrani Bhattacharjee ◽  
May A. K. Abdellatif ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srinivas Murki ◽  
Venkat Reddy Kallem ◽  
Jaishree Gururaj ◽  
Tanveer Bashir ◽  
Tejo Pratap Oleti ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document