131 Characterizing atlanto-occipital dissociation and its association with pediatric traumatic cardiac arrest: A descriptive case series

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. e92-e93
Author(s):  
Dayae Jeong ◽  
Gabrielle Freire ◽  
Suzanne Beno
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Mild Disability

Abstract Primary Subject area Emergency Medicine - Paediatric Background Atlanto-occipital dislocation (AOD) is a type of cervical spine injury (CSI) that is commonly fatal or associated with severe neurologic consequences. Although rare, AOD is now more commonly recognized in children as improved prehospital care allows for more patients to reach trauma centres and undergo definitive imaging. Patients with AOD often present with cardiorespiratory instability and prompt diagnosis is crucial. However, diagnosis may be delayed due to variation in imaging practices and lack of literature on this topic. Objectives Primary objective: Describe the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and long-term outcomes of children with AOD, compared to other upper CSI. Secondary objective: Describe the frequency of AOD and other upper CSI in pediatric traumatic cardiac arrest (PTCA) and the utility of a lateral c-spine radiograph in this setting. Design/Methods This was a retrospective, single-centre case series of all pediatric trauma patients age < 16 years diagnosed with upper CSI seen at a tertiary pediatric trauma centre from 2000-2020. Patients were included if they had evidence of bony or ligamentous injury from C0-2. The diagnosis of upper CSI was ascertained on autopsy, when available, then cross-sectional imaging, then plain radiographs, when the other modalities were unavailable. Data was obtained from manual chart review and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Thirty-six patients were excluded for not meeting upper CSI criteria. Of 93 patients with upper CSI, 24 had AOD: 14 (15%) complete and 10 (11%) incomplete (Table 1). The mechanism of injury was motor-vehicle-collision in 23 (96%) of these patients, and a fall in one (4%). All patients with complete AOD presented in PTCA and only one (7%) survived. Of seven patients with AOD who received a lateral c-spine x-ray during resuscitation, 5 (71%) had identifiable injuries. In contrast, of the 10 patients with incomplete AOD, only 1 (10%) presented in arrest and none died. Only one patient received an x-ray during resuscitation, which showed the injury but went undetected, and 100% of final diagnoses were made through CT. The majority of incomplete AOD patients were managed non-operatively and had minimal to mild disability. Conclusion In our study population, complete AOD was highly fatal with all patients presenting in PTCA. In contrast, incomplete AOD carried a more favorable prognosis with 100% survival and minimal-mild disability. If there is suspicion for AOD, a lateral c-spine XR in the trauma bay can aid in early diagnosis, guiding neurosurgical management and/or goals of care discussions.

Epidemiology, management and survival outcomes of adult out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest due to blunt, penetrating or burn injury

2021 ◽  
pp. emermed-2021-211723
Author(s):  
Tan N Doan ◽  
Daniel Wilson ◽  
Stephen Rashford ◽  
Louise Sims ◽  
Emma Bosley
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Vehicle Collision ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Injury Mechanisms ◽  
High Acuity

BackgroundSurvival from out-of-hospital traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is poor. Regional variation exists regarding epidemiology, management and outcomes. Data on prognostic factors are scant. A better understanding of injury patterns and outcome determinants is key to identifying opportunities for survival improvement.MethodsIncluded were adult (≥18 years) out-of-hospital TCA due to blunt, penetrating or burn injury, who were attended by Queensland Ambulance Service paramedics between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2019. We compared the characteristics of patients who were pronounced dead on paramedic arrival and those receiving resuscitation from paramedics. Intra-arrest procedures were described for attempted-resuscitation patients. Survival up to 6 months postarrest was reported, and factors associated with survival were investigated.Results3891 patients were included; 2394 (61.5%) were pronounced dead on paramedic arrival and 1497 (38.5%) received resuscitation from paramedics. Most arrests (79.8%) resulted from blunt trauma. Motor vehicle collision (42.4%) and gunshot wound (17.7%) were the most common injury mechanisms in patients pronounced dead on paramedic arrival, whereas the most prevalent mechanisms in attempted-resuscitation patients were motor vehicle (31.3%) and motorcycle (20.6%) collisions. Among attempted-resuscitation patients, rates of transport and survival to hospital handover, to hospital discharge and to 6 months were 31.9%, 15.3%, 9.8% and 9.8%, respectively. Multivariable model showed that advanced airway management (adjusted OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.17), intravenous access (OR 5.04; 95% CI 2.43 to 10.45) and attendance of high acuity response unit (highly trained prehospital care clinicians) (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.25 to 5.18) were associated with improved odds of survival to hospital handover.ConclusionsBy including all paramedic-attended patients, this study provides a more complete understanding of the epidemiology of out-of-hospital TCA. Contemporary survival rates from adult out-of-hospital TCA who receive resuscitation from paramedics may be higher than historically thought. Factors identified in this study as associated with survival may be useful to guide prognostication and treatment.

Paramedic Documentation of Indicators for Cervical Spine Injury

1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre M. Pennardt ◽  
Wm. John Zehner
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Motor Vehicle Accident ◽  
Spinal Injury ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Status Assessment

AbstractIntroduction:Current paramedic training mandates complete immobilization of all patients, symptomatic or not, whose mechanism of injury typically is viewed as conducive to spinal trauma. It is common to observe confrontations between paramedics and walking, asymptomatic accident victims who fail to understand why they should “wear that collar and be strapped to that board.” Immobilized, frustrated patients then may wait for hours in a busy emergency department until a physician declares them to be without spinal injury. Patients frequently refuse treatment and transport.Hypothesis:Algorithms exist for physicians to “clear” the cervical spine (C-spine) without radiography. It was hypothesized that paramedics routinely assess and document these indicators in their patient evaluations.Methods:A retrospective chart review was conducted on 161 patients (Group 1) admitted to a regional medical center with a diagnosis of C-spine injury over a 52-month period. The charts of 225 motor vehicle accident (MVA) victims (Group 2) transported by ambulance to the emergency department over a five-month period then were studied. Indicators for C-spine injury documented by emergency medical service (EMS) personnel were abstracted.Results:All patients underwent mental status assessment and full spinal immobilization (neck and back) by EMS crews prior to transport to the hospital. Two or more indicators of possible C-spine injury were documented on each prehospital care report (PCR).Conclusion:Paramedics already assess most, if not all, of the criteria standard to C-spine clearance algorithms, but are inconsistent in their documentation of the presence or absence of all of the relevant findings.

Prehospital care and transportation of pediatric trauma patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Casey J. Allen ◽  
Laura F. Teisch ◽  
Jonathan P. Meizoso ◽  
Juliet J. Ray ◽  
Carl I. Schulman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients

Traumatic peripheral nerve injuries in children: epidemiology and socioeconomics

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Symeon Missios ◽  
Kimon Bekelis ◽  
Robert J. Spinner
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Motor Vehicle Crashes ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Vehicle Crashes ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Injuries ◽  
Nerve Injuries ◽  
Pedestrian Accidents ◽  
Motorcycle Crashes

Object Despite the negative effects of peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) on long-term population health, their true prevalence among pediatric trauma patients is under debate. The authors investigated the prevalence of PNIs among children involved in trauma and investigated associations between PNIs and several patient characteristics. Methods The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of pediatric trauma patients who were registered in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2009 through 2011 and who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. They used regression techniques to investigate the association of demographic and socioeconomic factors with the rate of PNIs among these patients. Results Of the 245,470 study patients, 50,211 were involved in motor vehicle crashes, 3380 in motorcycle crashes, 20,491 in bicycle crashes, 18,262 in pedestrian accidents, 26,294 in other crashes (mainly involving all-terrain vehicles and snowmobiles), and 126,832 in falls. The respective prevalence of PNIs was 0.66% for motor vehicle crashes, 1% for motorcycle crashes, 0.38% for bicycle crashes, 0.42% for pedestrian accidents, 0.79% for other crashes, and 0.52% for falls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the following were associated with an increased incidence of PNIs: increased patient age (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.20), higher Injury Severity Score (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.20), elevated systolic blood pressure at arrival at the emergency room (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.20), and increased number of trauma surgeons at the institution (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.20). The following were associated with lower incidence of PNIs: female sex (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87–1.02), rural hospitals (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87–1.02), and urban nonteaching hospitals (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87–1.02). Conclusions PNIs are more common than previously identified for the pediatric trauma population. These injuries are associated with older age and increased severity of the overall injury.

Opportunity for Seatbelt Usage by ALS Providers

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Cook ◽  
Steven A. Meador ◽  
Barry D. Buckingham ◽  
Lee V. Groff
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Time Management ◽  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Seat Belt ◽  
Cardiac Arrest Patient ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Seat Belts ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
The Mean

AbstractPurpose:Prehospital care providers commonly indicate that they cannot wear seat belts owing to their need to be unrestrained while delivering care to the patient in the back of the ambulance. Each year, providers are injured in situations in which seat belts have been shown to be protective. Are ALS providers able to wear a seat belt and provide care in an ambulance?Methods:The ALS providers were asked to complete a form following calls during which they rode with a patient in the back of an ambulance. They indicated the amount of time which they felt they would have needed to have been unrestrained by seat belts and the reasons. There were no attempts to regulate or quantify seat belt usage. Additional information was gathered from the trip report.Results:The percentage of the time of each trip during which they felt they needed to be unrestrained was calculated for each trip. The mean was 41%. The mean transport time was 14.7 minutes. Sub-groupings by protocol type, showed that for cardiac arrest patients, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained for 82% of the duration of transport, for patients with “chest pain or cardiac dysrhythmia” 63%, for “shortness of breath” 38%, and for trauma patients 41%. Excluding cardiac arrest patients, the nine patients were assigned by the providers to have the most critical level of case severity required unrestrained time of 72%. Those nine patients with the lowest severity level requires that the provider by unrestrained only 18% of the time. Management of intravenous line and patient assessments most frequently were cited as reasons for needing to be unrestrained.Conclusion:Perceived need of ALS providers to be unrestrained varied with respect to the type of call, with cardiac arrest patient transports having the greatest need to be unrestrained. However, on the average, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained only 41% of the time; markedly less on some types of call, with cardiac arrest patient transports having the greatest need to be unrestrained. However, on the average, providers felt they needed to be unrestrained only 41% of the time; markedly less on some types of calls. The ALS providers should be able to wear seat belts for at least part of the time, on most ALS calls.

scholarly journals Epidemiology of pediatric trauma in the Kingdom of Bahrain: a national pediatric trauma registry pilot study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay C. Liu ◽  
Aieshah A. Ismael ◽  
Ayesha Zaidi ◽  
Ban W. Sha’ban ◽  
Shaikha Ebrahim Almutawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Policy Implementation ◽  
Trauma Registry ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Seat Belt ◽  
National Level ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Court System ◽  
Awareness Campaigns

Abstract Background A pediatric trauma registry for the Kingdom of Bahrain would be a novel public health tool for the Bahraini health system. The aim of this study was to explore the epidemiology of pediatric trauma at the national level by describing the distribution of pediatric injury in the Kingdom, and quantifying the burden of injury shouldered by the study population. Methods This multicenter observational cross-sectional study was conducted in Bahrain using data from the Pediatric Trauma Registry (PTR), which was a short-term paper-based prospective trauma registry that collected data over a three-month period in 2018. PTR was based in the pediatric emergency departments (ED) of the three national referral hospitals in the Kingdom. By simultaneously collecting data from all three trauma hospitals in the country, it was assumed that during the data collection period all major pediatric trauma patients in the country would be captured by the study, and that the data collected would provide national estimates of trauma. Inclusion criteria for the study was any individual under the age of 14, that arrived at the ED seeking care for intentional and unintentional injuries. Results A total of 1328 patients were included in the study. Sixty-nine percent of patients were treated and discharged from the ED, 30.5% were admitted to the hospital, admitted for surgery, or seen by a specialist, and 0.5% were declared deceased. The percentage of patients documented as unrestrained during Motor Vehicle Collisions (MVC) was 92.3%, and amongst those involved in MVC, 12% were ejected from the cabin of the vehicle. Conclusions There are significant implications that this study holds for policy implementation and practice surrounding injury prevention in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Low seatbelt utilization and the high proportion of ejection amongst MVC victims warrant immediate public health policy implementation, including enforcement of seat belt laws, strengthening of the traffic court system, and awareness campaigns for MVC prevention. Additionally, pediatric drowning prevention programs centered on constant adult supervision, pool isolation fencing, personal flotation devices, and swimming education should be created to address the mortality attributable to drowning in this study.

scholarly journals PL03: Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics: a safety evaluation

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S26-S27 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Vaillancourt ◽  
M. Charette ◽  
J.E. Sinclair ◽  
J. Maloney ◽  
R. Dionne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Eligible Patient ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Risk Criteria ◽  
Radiologic Evaluation ◽  
Kappa Agreement ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) was validated by emergency physicians and triage nurses to determine the need for radiography in alert and stable Emergency Department trauma patients. It was modified and validated for use by paramedics in 1,949 patients. The prehospital CCR calls for evaluation of active neck rotation if patients have none of 3 high-risk criteria and at least 1 of 4 low-risk criteria. This study evaluated the impact and safety of the implementation of the CCR by paramedics. Methods: This single-centre prospective cohort implementation study took place in Ottawa, Canada. Advanced and primary care paramedics received on-line and in-person training on the CCR, allowing them to use the CCR to evaluate eligible patients and selectively transport them without immobilization. We evaluated all consecutive eligible adult patients (GCS 15, stable vital signs) at risk for neck injury. Paramedics were required to complete a standardized study data form for each eligible patient evaluated. Study staff reviewed paramedic documentation and corresponding hospital records and diagnostic imaging reports. We followed all patients without initial radiologic evaluation for 30 days for referral to our spine service, or subsequent visit with radiologic evaluation. Analyses included sensitivity, specificity, kappa coefficient, t-test, and descriptive statistics with 95% CIs. Results: The 4,034 patients enrolled between Jan. 2011 and Aug. 2015 were: mean age 43 (range 16-99), female 53.3%, motor vehicle collision 51.9%, fall 23.8%, admitted to hospital 7.0%, acute c-spine injury 0.8%, and clinically important c-spine injury (0.3%). The CCR classified patients for 11 important injuries with sensitivity 91% (95% CI 58-100%), and specificity 67% (95% CI 65-68%). Kappa agreement for interpretation of the CCR between paramedics and study investigators was 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.95). Paramedics were comfortable or very comfortable using the CCR in 89.8% of cases. Mean scene time was 3 min (15.6%) shorter for those not immobilized (17 min vs. 20 min; p=0.0001). A total of 2,569 (63.7%) immobilizations were safely avoided using the CCR. Conclusion: Paramedics could safely and accurately apply the CCR to low-risk trauma patients. This had a significant impact on scene times and the number of prehospital immobilizations.

Epidemiologic Characteristics of Pediatric Trauma Patients Receiving Prehospital Care in Kigali, Rwanda

2017 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam R. Aluisio ◽  
Olivier Félix Umuhire ◽  
Gabin Mbanjumucyo ◽  
Naomi George ◽  
Alexis Kearney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prehospital Care ◽  
Pediatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Epidemiologic Characteristics

Detection of Cervical Spine Injuries in Alert, Asymptomatic Geriatric Blunt Trauma Patients: Who Benefits from Radiologic Imaging?

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (9) ◽  
pp. 773-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian W. Ong ◽  
Aurelio Rodriguez ◽  
Robert Kelly ◽  
Vicente Cortes ◽  
Jack Protetch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Cervical Spine Injuries ◽  
Spine Injuries ◽  
Anatomic Locations

There are differing recommendations in the literature regarding cervical spine imaging in alert, asymptomatic geriatric patients. Previous studies also have not used computed tomography routinely. Given that cervical radiographs may miss up to 60 per cent of fractures, the incidence of cervical spine injuries in this population and its implications for clinical management are unclear. We conducted a retrospective study of blunt trauma patients 65 years and older who were alert, asymptomatic, hemodynamically stable, and had normal neurologic examinations. For inclusion, patients were required to have undergone computed tomography and plain radiographs. The presence and anatomic location of potentially distracting injuries or pain were recorded. Two hundred seventy-four patients were included, with a mean age of 76 ± 10 years. The main mechanisms of injury were falls (51%) and motor vehicle crashes (41%). Nine of 274 (3%) patients had cervical spine injuries. The presence of potentially distracting injuries above the clavicles was associated with cervical injury when compared with patients with distracting injuries in other anatomic locations or no distracting injuries (8/115 vs 1/159, P = 0.03). There was no association of cervical spine injury with age greater or less than 75 years or with mechanism of injury. The overall incidence of cervical spine injury in the alert, asymptomatic geriatric population is low. The risk is increased with a potentially distracting injury above the clavicles. Patients with distracting injuries in other anatomic locations or no distracting injuries may not need routine cervical imaging.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document