scholarly journals IMPACT OF A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE ON UNPLANNED EXTUBATION (UE) RATE IN THE NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT (NICU)

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. e16-e16
Author(s):  
Mark Hewitt ◽  
Erin Sproul ◽  
Jo-Anna Hudson ◽  
Julie Emberley

Abstract BACKGROUND Unplanned extubations (UEs) refer to any removal of an endotracheal tube not directly ordered or intended by the medical team. It is the fourth most common adverse event in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and can lead to significant morbidity in this vulnerable population. A large proportion of UEs in the NICU are deemed preventable and UE rates are increasingly being recognized as an important quality of care metric. OBJECTIVES To examine the effectiveness of an education-based quality improvement initiative to decrease UE rate in a level II/III NICU with a high rate of UEs DESIGN/METHODS Pre-intervention UE rate was determined by retrospective chart review for all intubated neonates admitted to a 25 bed level II/III NICU from January 2013 until December 2013. UEs were recorded along with demographic information including reason for extubation. UE rate was calculated by number of UEs/100 ventilator days and the data was analyzed to determine any significantly associated risk factors. The UE quality improvement initiative included: multi-disciplinary NICU staff education sessions, placement of educational posters in the NICU and identification of high risk neonates as defined by the pre-intervention study. High risk neonates were given additional signage to alert care providers. Standardized documentation was implemented to track and record UEs prospectively. Six months post-implementation, all UE events were reviewed from December 2015 until May 2016 and the post-intervention UE rate was calculated. RESULTS The UE rate was 3.28 UEs/100 ventilator days in the pre-intervention cohort with neonatal movement and adhesive failure accounting for over 50% of the documented UEs. Regression analysis revealed total ventilation time to be the only significant (p<0.05) risk factor for an UE. In the post-intervention cohort the UE rate was 1.45 UEs/100 ventilator days, a 56% decrease from the pre-intervention rate. Rates of re-intubation following an UE were 78.3% and 50% for the pre- and post-implementation cohorts respectively. CONCLUSION Reduction in UE rate from 3.28 to 1.45 was achieved with an education-based multi-disciplinary quality improvement initiative. Rates of re-intubation following an UE were similar between cohorts. Further study is necessary to evaluate whether the effectiveness of this intervention will persist over time and whether results are generalizable to other NICUs.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e001079
Author(s):  
Kathryn L Ponder ◽  
Charles Egesdal ◽  
Joanne Kuller ◽  
Priscilla Joe

ObjectiveTo improve care for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome.DesignInfants with a gestational age of ≥35 weeks with prenatal opioid exposure were eligible for our quality improvement initiative. Interventions in our Plan–Do–Study–Act cycles included physician consensus, re-emphasis on non-pharmacological treatment, the Eat Sleep Console method to measure functional impairment, morphine as needed, clonidine and alternative soothing methods for parental unavailability (volunteer cuddlers and automated sleeper beds). Pre-intervention and post-intervention outcomes were compared.ResultsLength of stay decreased from 31.8 to 10.5 days (p<0.0001) without an increase in readmissions. Composite pharmacotherapy exposure days decreased from 28.7 to 5.5 (p<0.0001). This included reductions in both morphine exposure days (p<0.0001) and clonidine exposure days (p=0.01). Fewer infants required pharmacotherapy (p=0.02).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates how a comprehensive initiative can improve care for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome in an open-bay or a high-acuity neonatal intensive care unit when rooming-in is not available or other comorbidities are present.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Kristoff ◽  
Rui Wang ◽  
David Munson ◽  
Kevin Dysart ◽  
Stracuzzi Lauren ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. e001474
Author(s):  
Kalyan Chakravarthy Konda ◽  
Himabindu Singh ◽  
Alimelu Madireddy ◽  
Megha Mala Rao Poodari

Antimicrobial resistance is an emerging global problem concerned with patient safety. It is even more challenging in developing countries like India. Antibiotic stewardship initiative is the best arrow in the quiver to prevent and control this antimicrobial resistance. We observed 61% of the neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit of Niloufer hospital, Hyderabad, India were receiving improper antibiotics with respect to choice of drug or dosage or duration. Subsequently, an antibiotic stewardship team was formed to address the antibiotic misuse. Team consisted of neonatology faculty, residents, staff nurses, infection control nurses and microbiologist. We identified problems related to staff awareness, policy issues like lack of display of the antibiotic policy and lack of antibiotic lock, process issues like low rate of documentation of indication for initiation or escalation of antibiotic and a lack of dynamic review plan regarding continuation or de-escalation. We used the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to test and adapt solutions to these problems. Within 10 weeks of starting our quality improvement (QI) project, the proportion of unindicated antibiotic usage decreased from 61% to 27%. Timely de-escalation of antibiotic is a neglected intervention in neonates, and yielded the maximum result in our study. We conclude that QI projects are simple, doable yet powerful effective tools to address the burning problems like antibiotic misuse. This result was very satisfying and encouraging boosting our team’s faith in the effectiveness of QI approach.


Author(s):  
Theony Deshommes ◽  
Christian Nagel ◽  
Richard Tucker ◽  
Lindsay Dorcélus ◽  
Jacqueline Gautier ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Healthcare-associated infections (HCAI) are major causes of morbidity, mortality, increased lengths of stay and are an economic burden on healthcare systems in resources-limited settings. This is especially true for neonates, who are more susceptible with underdeveloped immune systems. Hand hygiene (HH) is a key weapon against HCAI, yet globally, HH compliance remains substandard. This study sought to determine the compliance with HH among healthcare workers (HCWs) in a children’s hospital neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Haiti. Methods A HH educational intervention was performed in the NICU, including lectures and posters. Pre- and post-intervention HH data were collected on HCWs and parents using the World Health Organization ‘5 Moments for HH’. Data were analyzed using standard statistical analysis. Results HH increased in all HCW roles but not in parents. Correct HH increased in all groups, including parents. HH was more likely to occur prior to patient contact than after patient contact. Correct HH was more likely to occur with alcohol-based hand rub than with soap and water. Conclusion This study demonstrates that an inexpensive and simple intervention can significantly increase HH compliance in a resource-limited NICU, which may lead to decreased rates of hospital-acquired sepsis. Parents, however, due to cultural norms as well as literacy and language barriers, need targeted educational interventions distinct from those that HCW benefit from.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document