scholarly journals Corrigendum to: Heterogeneity of germline variants in high risk breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes in India

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 134-134
Author(s):  
Archana Sharma-Oates ◽  
Abeer M Shaaban ◽  
Ian Tomlinson ◽  
Luke Wynne ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Cazier ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archana Sharma-Oates ◽  
Abeer M Shaaban ◽  
Ian Tomlinson ◽  
Luke Wynne ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Cazier ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Di Shao ◽  
Shaomin Cheng ◽  
Fengming Guo ◽  
Yuying Yuan ◽  
Kunling Hu ◽  
...  

AbstractTo determine the prevalence and clinical prediction factors associated with deleterious mutations among 882 high-risk Chinese individuals who underwent multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk assessment. Subjects were selected from individuals referred for genetic testing using a 21-gene panel (Oseq-BRCA) between January 2015 and March 2018. The distribution and prevalence of deleterious mutations were analyzed for the full cohort as well as subtypes. Overall, 176 deleterious mutations were observed in 19.50% (n = 172) individuals. Of these, 26 mutations are not reported in public databases and literatures. In the ovarian cancer only subgroup, 115 deleterious mutations were identified in 429 patients (48.6%). Patients with ovarian cancer with mutations were enriched for a family history of breast or ovarian cancers (p < 0.05). In the breast cancer only subgroup, 31 deleterious mutations were identified in 261 patients. Most mutations occurred inBRCA1(8; 25.8%) andBRCA2(11; 35.5%). An additional 12 deleterious mutations (38.7%) were found in 7 other susceptibility genes. An increased frequency of mutation rate (57.9%) was observed in the subgroup of subjects with histories of both breast and ovarian cancer. Taken together, 19.50% of individuals carried a deleterious mutation in HBOC susceptibility genes in our cohort. Subgroup of subjects with histories of both breast and ovarian cancer had the highest prevalence of mutations. Our results highlighted the genetic heterogeneity of HBOC and the efficiency of multigene panel in performing risk assessment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Hackmann ◽  
Franziska Kuhlee ◽  
Elitza Betcheva-Krajcir ◽  
Anne-Karin Kahlert ◽  
Luisa Mackenroth ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 418-418
Author(s):  
Hong Truong ◽  
Rania Sheikh ◽  
Aliya Khurram ◽  
Yelena Kemel ◽  
Andrew Thomas Lenis ◽  
...  

418 Background: Gender differences exist in bladder cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, and outcomes. Women have lower incidence of bladder cancer but are diagnosed with more advanced disease at presentation. They also have less favorable outcomes even after adjusting for tumor stage and treatment modality. The biologic mechanisms underlying gender disparities in bladder cancer remain unknown. Methods: We leveraged a prospective matched tumor-normal genomic profiling initiative to determine the prevalence and spectrum of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants in women with bladder cancer. Germline DNA was tested for mutations in ≥77 cancer susceptibility genes using next-generation sequencing in 686 patients with bladder cancer. Mutation frequency and clinical characteristics were assessed by gender. Results: A total of 184 (27%) women and 502 (73%) men with bladder cancer underwent germline testing; median age of diagnosis was 66 ± 11.3 and 65 ± 11.3 years, respectively. Twenty-two women (12%) had bladder cancer diagnosis at age ≤ 50 years. Both groups had similar rate of tobacco exposure (57% vs 63%, p = 0.1), family history of bladder cancer (10% vs 10%, p = 0.5), and disease stage at diagnosis (non-muscle invasive bladder cancer [NMIBC] 54% vs 54%, MIBC 38% vs 39%, and metastatic disease 8% vs 6%, p = 0.7). Women had more non-urothelial carcinoma histology than men (adenocarcinoma 5% vs. 1%; squamous cell carcinoma 1% vs 0.2%, p = 0.001). More P/LP germline variants were found in women than men (38 [21%] vs. 70 [14%], p = 0.04). Twenty-eight women (15%) had P/LP variants in DNA-damage repair (DDR) genes; 23 (13%) carried moderate/high penetrance germline mutations, the most common were BRCA1/ 2, CHEK2, NBN, ATM, and MITF. Current clinical guideline for referral for genetic testing failed to identify 12 (52%) women with moderate/high penetrance germline mutations. Nine women (5%) carried germline mutations associated with increased risk of ovarian/endometrial cancers ( BRCA1/ 2 [5], ATM [2], MLH1 [1], TP53 [1]). Conclusions: Deleterious germline alterations are commonly present in women with high-risk bladder cancer. The presence of germline variants in some genes, such as BRCA1/2, can guide cancer screening and risk-reducing surgeries for patients and their families. Women with high-risk bladder cancer should be evaluated for suitability of germline testing, especially those who desire preservation of uterus and ovaries at the time of radical cystectomy, to rule out the presence of P/LP variants that increase risk of future gynecologic malignancies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Yablonski-Peretz ◽  
Shani Paluch-Shimon ◽  
Lior Soussan Gutman ◽  
Yulia Kaplan ◽  
Addie Dvir ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 2701-2712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Edwin S. Iversen ◽  
Daniel F. Gudbjartsson ◽  
Elaine H. Hiller ◽  
Judy E. Garber ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To compare genetic test results for deleterious mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 with estimated probabilities of carrying such mutations; to assess sensitivity of genetic testing; and to assess the relevance of other susceptibility genes in familial breast and ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data analyzed were from six high-risk genetic counseling clinics and concern individuals from families for which at least one member was tested for mutations at BRCA1 and BRCA2. Predictions of genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer for 301 individuals were made using BRCAPRO, a statistical model and software using Mendelian genetics and Bayesian updating. Model predictions were compared with the results of genetic testing. RESULTS: Among the test individuals, 126 were Ashkenazi Jewish, three were male subjects, 243 had breast cancer, 49 had ovarian cancer, 34 were unaffected, and 139 tested positive for BRCA1 mutations and 29 for BRCA2 mutations. BRCAPRO performed well: for the 150 probands with the smallest BRCAPRO carrier probabilities (average, 29.0%), the proportion testing positive was 32.7%; for the 151 probands with the largest carrier probabilities (average, 95.2%), 78.8% tested positive. Genetic testing sensitivity was estimated to be at least 85%, with false-negatives including mutations of susceptibility genes heretofore unknown. CONCLUSION: BRCAPRO is an accurate counseling tool for determining the probability of carrying mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is highly sensitive, missing an estimated 15% of mutations. In the populations studied, breast cancer susceptibility genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 either do not exist, are rare, or are associated with low disease penetrance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document