A novel high-throughput assay using mixed genomic DNA for fast screening germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes

The demand for genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes is increasing for both breast cancer patients and healthy individuals. Here we established a novel high-throughput assay to detect germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes. In general, up 10 to 50 individual genomic DNA samples were mixed together to create a mixed DNA sample and the mixed DNA sample was subjected to a next-generation multigene panel. Germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes could be found in the mixed DNA sample; next, site-specific Sanger sequencing was performed to identify individuals who carried he pathogenic variant in the mixed samples. We found that the recall and precision rates were 89.9% and 92.9% when twenty individual genomic samples were mixed. Therefore, our new assay can increase an approximately 20-fold of efficacy to identify the pathogenic variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes in individuals when compared with current assay.

Mutational Spectrum of Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes among Women in Northeast Brazil

Purpose: There is a paucity of data on the spectrum and prevalence of pathogenic variants among women of African ancestry in the Northeast region of Brazil. Methods: We performed BROCA panel sequencing to identify inherited loss-of-function variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes among 292 Brazilian women referred to a single institution cancer risk assessment program. Results: The study included a convenient cohort of 173 women with invasive breast cancer and 119 women who were cancer-free at the time of ascertainment. The majority of the women self-reported as African-descended (67% for cases and 90.8% for controls). Thirty-seven pathogenic variants were found in 36 (20.8%) patients. While the spectrum of pathogenic variants was heterogeneous, the majority (70.3%) of the pathogenic variants were detected in high-risk genes BRCA1 , BRCA2 , PALB2 , and TP53 . Pathogenic variants were also found in the ATM , BARD1 , BRIP1 , FAM175A , FANCM , NBN , and SLX4 genes in 6.4% of the affected women. Four recurrent pathogenic variants were detected in 11 patients of African ancestry. Only one unaffected woman had a pathogenic variant in the RAD51C gene. Conclusion: The high prevalence and heterogenous spectrum of pathogenic variants identified among self-reported African descendants in Northeast Brazil is consistent with studies in other African populations with a high burden of aggressive young onset breast cancer. It underscores the need to integrate comprehensive cancer risk assessment and genomic testing in the management of newly diagnosed Black women with breast cancer across the African Diaspora, enabling improved cancer control in admixed underserved and understudied populations.

Association of Family Cancer History With Pathogenic Variants in Specific Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes

PURPOSE Family cancer history is an important component of genetic testing guidelines that estimate which patients with breast cancer are most likely to carry a germline pathogenic variant (PV). However, we do not know whether more extensive family history is differentially associated with PVs in specific genes. METHODS All women diagnosed with breast cancer in 2013-2017 and reported to statewide SEER registries of Georgia and California were linked to clinical genetic testing results and family history from two laboratories. Family history was defined as strong (suggestive of PVs in high-penetrance genes such as BRCA1/2 or TP53, including male breast, ovarian, pancreatic, sarcoma, or multiple female breast cancers), moderate (any other cancer history), or none. Among established breast cancer susceptibility genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, NF1, PALB2, PTEN, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53), we evaluated PV prevalence according to family history extent and breast cancer subtype. We used a multivariable model to test for interaction between affected gene and family history extent for ATM, BRCA1/2, CHEK2, and PALB2. RESULTS A total of 34,865 women linked to genetic results. Higher PV prevalence with increasing family history extent ( P < .001) was observed only with BRCA1 (3.04% with none, 3.22% with moderate, and 4.06% with strong history) and in triple-negative breast cancer with PALB2 (0.75% with none, 2.23% with moderate, and 2.63% with strong history). In a multivariable model adjusted for age and subtype, there was no interaction between family history extent and PV prevalence for any gene except PALB2 ( P = .037). CONCLUSION Extent of family cancer history is not differentially associated with PVs across established breast cancer susceptibility genes and cannot be used to personalize genes selected for testing.

Correction to: Updates in Genetic Testing Guidelines for Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes: a Change in the Paradigm

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s12609-021-00425-z

Disease Spectrum of Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes

BackgroundPathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes can increase the risk of a spectrum of diseases, which clinicians must manage for their patients. We evaluated the disease spectrum of breast cancer susceptibility genes (BCSGs) with the aim of developing a comprehensive resource of gene-disease associations for clinicians.MethodsTwelve genes (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, CHEK2, NF1, PALB2, PTEN, RECQL, STK11, and TP53), all of which have been conclusively established as BCSGs by the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) and/or the NCCN guidelines, were investigated. The potential gene-disease associations for these 12 genes were verified and evaluated based on six genetic resources (ClinGen, NCCN, OMIM, Genetics Home Reference, GeneCards, and Gene-NCBI) and an additional literature review using a semiautomated natural language processing (NLP) abstract classification procedure.ResultsForty-two diseases were found to be associated with one or more of the 12 BCSGs for a total of 86 gene-disease associations, of which 90% (78/86) were verified by ClinGen and/or NCCN. Four gene-disease associations could not be verified by either ClinGen or NCCN but were verified by at least three of the other four genetic resources. Four gene-disease associations were verified by the NLP procedure alone.ConclusionThis study is unique in that it systematically investigates the reported disease spectrum of BCSGs by surveying multiple genetic resources and the literature with the aim of developing a single consolidated, comprehensive resource for clinicians. This innovative approach provides a general guide for evaluating gene-disease associations for BCSGs, potentially improving the clinical management of at-risk individuals.