Comment on “Dating the Bushveld Complex: Timing of Crystallization, Duration of Magmatism, and Cooling of the World’s Largest Layered Intrusion and Related Rocks” by James S. Scoates, J.S., Wall, C.J, Friedman, R.M., Weis, D., Mathez, E.A. & VanTongeren, J.A. (2021) Journal of Petrology. doi: 10.1093/petrology/egaa107

Abstract The Paleoproterozoic Bushveld Complex, including the world’s largest layered intrusion and host to world-class stratiform chromium, platinum group element, and vanadium deposits, is a remarkable natural laboratory for investigating the timescales of magmatic processes in the Earth’s crust. A framework for the emplacement, crystallization, and cooling of the Bushveld Complex based on integrated U-Pb zircon-baddeleyite-titanite-rutile geochronology is presented for samples of different rock types from the Bushveld Complex, including ultramafic and mafic cumulates, mineralized horizons, granitic rocks from the roof, and a carbonatite from the nearby alkaline Phalaborwa Complex. The results indicate that (1) the Bushveld Complex was built incrementally over a ∼5 million-year interval from 2060 Ma to 2055 Ma with a peak in magma flux at c.2055–2056 Ma, (2) U-Pb zircon crystallization ages do not decrease in an uninterrupted systematic manner from the base to the top of the intrusion indicating that the Bushveld Complex does not represent the crystallized products of a single progressively filled and cooled magma chamber, and (3) U-Pb rutile dates constrain cooling of the intrusion at the level of the Critical Zone through ∼500 °C by 2053 Ma. The c.2060 Ma Phalaborwa Complex (pyroxenite, syenite, carbonatite + Cu-Fe-phosphate-vermiculite deposits) represents one of the earliest manifestations of widespread Bushveld-related magmatism in the northern Kaapvaal craton. The extended range and out-of-sequence U-Pb zircon dates determined for a harzburgite from the Lower Zone (c.2056 Ma), an orthopyroxenite from the Lower Critical Zone (c.2057 Ma), and orthopyroxenites from the Upper Critical Zone (c.2057–2060 Ma) are interpreted to indicate that the lower part of the Bushveld Complex developed through successive intrusions and accretion of sheet-like intrusions (sills), some intruded at different stratigraphic levels. Crystallization of the main volume of the Bushveld Complex, as represented by the thick gabbroic sequences of the Main Zone and Upper Zone, is constrained to a relatively narrow interval of time (∼1 million years) at c.2055–2056 Ma. Granites and granophyres in the roof, and a diorite in the uppermost Upper Zone, constitute the youngest igneous activity in the Bushveld Complex at c.2055 Ma. Collectively, these results contribute to an emerging paradigm shift for the assembly of some ultramafic-mafic magmatic systems from the conventional “big tank” model to an “amalgamated sill” model. The volume-duration relationship determined for magmatism in the Bushveld Complex, when compared to timescales established for the assembly of other layered intrusions and more silica-rich plutonic-volcanic systems worldwide, is distinct and equivalent to those determined for Phanerozoic continental and oceanic flood basalts that constitute large igneous provinces. Emplacement of the 2055–2060 Ma Bushveld Complex corresponds to the end of the Lomagundi-Jatuli Event, the largest magnitude positive carbon isotope excursion in Earth history, and this temporal correlation suggests that there may have been a contribution from voluminous Bushveld ultramafic-mafic-silicic magmatism to disruptions in the global paleoenvironment.

Download Full-text

Igneous Rock Associations 23. The Bushveld Complex, South Africa: New Insights and Paradigms

Geoscience Canada ◽

10.12789/geocanj.2018.45.138 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 45 (3-4) ◽

pp. 117-135

Author(s):

Stephen A. Prevec

Keyword(s):

Magma Chamber ◽

Bushveld Complex ◽

Magma Mixing ◽

Layered Intrusion ◽

Ore Deposits ◽

Magmatic Fluid ◽

Magma Chamber Processes ◽

Ore Minerals ◽

Gravity Driven ◽

Conventional Cooling

SUMMARYThe Bushveld Complex has continued to serve as the basis for study into the fundamental nature of petrological processes for layered intrusion formation and for oxide and sulphide hosted Platinum Group Element (PGE)–Cu–Ni ore deposits. These studies have included discoveries in terms of the physical extent of Bushveld magmatism, both laterally and internally. Lateral variations in the mafic to ultramafic Rustenburg Layered Suite of the Northern Lobe of the complex have also revealed petrologically distinctive Upper Critical Zone equivalent rocks (the so-called Flatreef) with enhanced contamination and mineralization traits that reflect a transition between Eastern and Western Lobe equivalent stratigraphy and Platreef-style complexity. Traditional magma mixing models have been re-examined in light of radiogenic isotopic evidence for crustal involvement early in the chromite precipitation or formation process, combined with evidence for associated heterogeneous fluid contents, cryptic layering profiles, and textural evidence. A wide variety of alternative ore-genesis models have been proposed as a consequence. The fundamental mechanics of magma chamber processes and the existence of the magma chamber as an entity have been called into question through various lines of evidence which have promoted the concept of progressive emplacement of the complex as a stack of not-necessarily-quite-sequentially intruded sills (with or without significant quantities of transported phenocrysts), emplaced into variably crystallized and compacted crystal-liquid mush mixtures, modified by compaction-driven late magmatic fluid (silicate and aqueous) activity. Alternatively, petrological and geochemical observations have been used to discount these interpretations in favour of more conventional cooling and gravity-driven accumulation of silicate and ore minerals in a large, liquid-dominated system.RÉSUMÉLe complexe de Bushveld a demeuré à la base d’études sur la nature fondamentale des processus pétrologiques de formation d’intrusions litées et des gîtes des éléments du groupe platine (ÉGP)-Cu-Ni hébergés dans les oxydes et les sulfures. Ces études ont comporté des découvertes sur l’étendue physique, à la fois latérale et interne, du magmatisme de Bushveld. Les variations latérales de la suite stratifiée et mafique à ultramafique Rustenburg du lobe nord du complexe ont également révélé des roches équivalentes pétrologiquement distinctes de la zone critique supérieure (le communément désigné Flatreef) avec des traits de contamination et de minéralisation accrus qui reflètent une transition entre la stratigraphie équivalente des lobes est et ouest et la complexité de type Platreef. Les modèles traditionnels de mélanges magmatiques ont été réexaminés à la lumière de preuves isotopiques radiogéniques indiquant une implication de la croûte au début du processus de précipitation ou de formation de la chromite, combinées à des preuves de contenu fluide hétérogène associé, de profils de litage cryptique et de preuves texturales. Ainsi, une grande variété de modèles alternatifs de genèse de minerai a été proposée. La mécanique fondamentale des processus de la chambre magmatique et l'existence de la chambre magmatique en tant qu'entité ont été remises en question au moyen de divers éléments de preuve qui ont mis en avant le concept de mise en place progressive du complexe sous forme d'un empilement non-nécessairement séquentiel de sills injectés (avec ou sans quantités significatives de phénocristaux transportés) mis en place dans des mélanges de bouillie cristaux/liquide à cristallisation et compaction variable, modifiés par une activité tardive de fluide magmatique (silicaté et aqueux) induite par la compaction. Alternativement, des observations pétrologiques et géochimiques ont été utilisées pour écarter ces interprétations en faveur d'un processus plus conventionnel de refroidissement et d’accumulation de minérais silicatés et minéralisés induite par la gravité dans un vaste système à dominance liquide.

Download Full-text

The Bushveld Complex: A Unique Layered Intrusion The Vredefort Dome: Astrobleme or Gravity-Driven Diapir?

Crustal Evolution of Southern Africa ◽

10.1007/978-1-4613-8147-1_6 ◽

1982 ◽

pp. 175-202 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

A. J. Tankard ◽

M. P. A. Jackson ◽

K. A. Eriksson ◽

D. K. Hobday ◽

D. R. Hunter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bushveld Complex ◽

Layered Intrusion ◽

Gravity Driven

Download Full-text

Sintering as a key process in the textural evolution of chromitite seams in layered mafic-ultramafic intrusions

The Canadian Mineralogist ◽

10.3749/canmin.2100021 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 59 (6) ◽

pp. 1661-1692

Author(s):

Emma J. Hunt ◽

Brian O'Driscoll ◽

James M.D. Day

Keyword(s):

Solid State ◽

Crystal Size ◽

Bushveld Complex ◽

Layered Intrusion ◽

Platinum Group Metals ◽

Coarse Grained ◽

Fine Grained ◽

Textural Evolution ◽

Compositional Homogeneity ◽

Textural Equilibration

ABSTRACT Nearly monomineralic stratiform chromitite seams of variable thickness (millimeters to meters) occur in many of the world's layered mafic-ultramafic intrusions. These seams are often associated with economically significant quantities of platinum group metals, yet the petrogenesis of these societally important materials remains enigmatic. Here we evaluate processes associated with late-magmatic (postcumulus) textural maturation of chromitite seams from four layered mafic-ultramafic intrusions of different ages and sizes. From largest to smallest, these intrusions are the ∼2060 Ma Bushveld Complex (South Africa), the ∼2710 Ma Stillwater Complex (USA), the ∼1270 Ma Muskox Intrusion (Canada), and the ∼60 Ma Rum Eastern Layered Intrusion (Scotland). Three endmember chromitite textures are described, based on chromite grain size and degree of textural equilibration: (1) coarse-grained chromite crystals (>0.40 mm) that occur in the central portions of seams and exhibit high degrees of solid-state textural equilibration; (2) fine-grained chromite crystals (0.11–0.44 mm) at the margins of seams in contact with and disseminated throughout host anorthosite or pyroxenite; and (3) fine-grained chromite crystals (0.005–0.28 mm) hosted within intra-seam orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene, and olivine oikocrysts. Crystal size distribution and spatial distribution pattern analyses are consistent with coarsening occurring through processes of textural maturation, including the sintering of grains by coalescence. We propose that textural maturation initially occurred in the supra-solidus state followed by an important stage of solid-state textural maturation and that these equilibration processes played a major role in the eventual microstructural and compositional homogeneity of the chromitite seams.

Download Full-text

Lithostratigraphy of the Palaeoproterozoic Hekpoort Formation (Pretoria Group, Transvaal Supergroup), South Africa

South African Journal of Geology ◽

10.25131/sajg.123.0043 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 123 (4) ◽

pp. 655-668

Author(s):

N. Lenhardt ◽

W. Altermann ◽

F. Humbert ◽

M. de Kock

Keyword(s):

South Africa ◽

Bushveld Complex ◽

Sedimentary Rocks ◽

Type Locality ◽

Large Igneous Province ◽

Braided River ◽

River Systems ◽

The West ◽

Igneous Province ◽

Transvaal Supergroup

Abstract The Palaeoproterozoic Hekpoort Formation of the Pretoria Group is a lava-dominated unit that has a basin-wide extent throughout the Transvaal sub-basin of South Africa. Additional correlative units may be present in the Kanye sub-basin of Botswana. The key characteristic of the formation is its general geochemical uniformity. Volcaniclastic and other sedimentary rocks are relatively rare throughout the succession but may be dominant in some locations. Hekpoort Formation outcrops are sporadic throughout the basin and mostly occur in the form of gentle hills and valleys, mainly encircling Archaean domes and the Palaeoproterozoic Bushveld Complex (BC). The unit is exposed in the western Pretoria Group basin, sitting unconformably either on the Timeball Hill Formation or Boshoek Formation, which is lenticular there, and on top of the Boshoek Formation in the east of the basin. The unit is unconformably overlain by the Dwaalheuwel Formation. The type-locality for the Hekpoort Formation is the Hekpoort farm (504 IQ Hekpoort), ca. 60 km to the west-southwest of Pretoria. However, no stratotype has ever been proposed. A lectostratotype, i.e., the Mooikloof area in Pretoria East, that can be enhanced by two reference stratotypes are proposed herein. The Hekpoort Formation was deposited in a cratonic subaerial setting, forming a large igneous province (LIP) in which short-termed localised ponds and small braided river systems existed. It therefore forms one of the major Palaeoproterozoic magmatic events on the Kaapvaal Craton.

Download Full-text