scholarly journals Monitoring Socioeconomic Inequalities in Sexually Transmitted Infections, Tuberculosis, and Violence: Geocoding and Choice of Area-Based Socioeconomic Measures—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project (US)

2003 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Krieger ◽  
Pamela D. Waterman ◽  
Jarvis T. Chen ◽  
Mah-Jabeen Soobader ◽  
SV Subramanian
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Sexually Transmitted Infections ◽  
Census Tract ◽  
Public Health Surveillance ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Surveillance ◽  
Block Group ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Zip Code

Objectives. To determine which area-based socioeconomic measures, at which level of geography, are suitable for monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in sexually transmitted infections (STIs), tuberculosis (TB), and violence in the United States. Methods. Cross-sectional analysis of public health surveillance data, geocoded and linked to area-based socioeconomic measures generated from 1990 census tract, block group, and ZIP Code data. We included all incident cases among residents of either Massachusetts (MA; 1990 population = 6,016,425) or Rhode Island (RI; 1990 population = 1,003,464) for: STIs (MA: 1994–1998, n = 26,535 chlamydia, 7,464 gonorrhea, 2,619 syphilis; RI: 1994–1996, n = 4,473 chlamydia, 1,256 gonorrhea, 305 syphilis); TB (MA: 1993–1998, n = 1,793; RI: 1985–1994, n = 576), and non-fatal weapons related injuries (MA: 1995–1997, n = 6,628). Results. Analyses indicated that: ( a) block group and tract socioeconomic measures performed similarly within and across both states, with results more variable for the ZIP Code level measures; ( b) measures of economic deprivation consistently detected the steepest socioeconomic gradients, considered across all outcomes (incidence rate ratios on the order of 10 or higher for syphilis, gonorrhea, and non-fatal intentional weapons-related injuries, and 7 or higher for chlamydia and TB); and ( c) results were similar for categories generated by quintiles and by a priori categorical cut-points. Conclusions. Supplementing U.S. public health surveillance systems with census tract or block group area-based socioeconomic measures of economic deprivation could greatly enhance monitoring and analysis of social inequalities in health in the United States.

Disaggregation of Latina/o Child and Adult Health Data: A Systematic Review of Public Health Surveillance Surveys in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-79
Author(s):  
Carmela Alcántara ◽  
Shakira F. Suglia ◽  
Irene Perez Ibarra ◽  
A. Louise Falzon ◽  
Elliot McCullough ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Public Health Surveillance ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Health Surveillance ◽  
Adult Health

Structural Transphobia, Homophobia, and Biphobia in Public Health Practice: The Example of COVID-19 Surveillance

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e7
Author(s):  
Randall L. Sell ◽  
Elise I. Krims
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
Public Health Surveillance ◽  
Public Health Practice ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Surveillance ◽  
Essential Information ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Public Health Surveillance System

Public health surveillance can have profound impacts on the health of populations, with COVID-19 surveillance offering an illuminating example. Surveillance surrounding COVID-19 testing, confirmed cases, and deaths has provided essential information to public health professionals about how to minimize morbidity and mortality. In the United States, surveillance has also pointed out how populations, on the basis of geography, age, and race and ethnicity, are being impacted disproportionately, allowing targeted intervention and evaluation. However, COVID-19 surveillance has also highlighted how the public health surveillance system fails some communities, including sexual and gender minorities. This failure has come about because of the haphazard and disorganized way disease reporting data are collected, analyzed, and reported in the United States, and the structural homophobia, transphobia, and biphobia acting within these systems. We provide recommendations for addressing these concerns after examining experiences collecting race data in COVID-19 surveillance and attempts in Pennsylvania and California to incorporate sexual orientation and gender identity variables into their pandemic surveillance efforts. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print June 10, 2021: e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.3062727 )

scholarly journals Collection of Data on Race, Ethnicity, Language, and Nativity by US Public Health Surveillance and Monitoring Systems: Gaps and Opportunities

2017 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Rodriguez-Lainz ◽  
Mariana McDonald ◽  
Maureen Fonseca-Ford ◽  
Ana Penman-Aguilar ◽  
Stephen H. Waterman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Public Health Surveillance ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Surveillance ◽  
Monitoring Systems ◽  
Primary Language ◽  
Use Of Data ◽  
Race Ethnicity

Objective: Despite increasing diversity in the US population, substantial gaps in collecting data on race, ethnicity, primary language, and nativity indicators persist in public health surveillance and monitoring systems. In addition, few systems provide questionnaires in foreign languages for inclusion of non-English speakers. We assessed (1) the extent of data collected on race, ethnicity, primary language, and nativity indicators (ie, place of birth, immigration status, and years in the United States) and (2) the use of data-collection instruments in non-English languages among Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)–supported public health surveillance and monitoring systems in the United States. Methods: We identified CDC-supported surveillance and health monitoring systems in place from 2010 through 2013 by searching CDC websites and other federal websites. For each system, we assessed its website, documentation, and publications for evidence of the variables of interest and use of data-collection instruments in non-English languages. We requested missing information from CDC program officials, as needed. Results: Of 125 data systems, 100 (80%) collected data on race and ethnicity, 2 more collected data on ethnicity but not race, 26 (21%) collected data on racial/ethnic subcategories, 40 (32%) collected data on place of birth, 21 (17%) collected data on years in the United States, 14 (11%) collected data on immigration status, 13 (10%) collected data on primary language, and 29 (23%) used non-English data-collection instruments. Population-based surveys and disease registries more often collected data on detailed variables than did case-based, administrative, and multiple-source systems. Conclusions: More complete and accurate data on race, ethnicity, primary language, and nativity can improve the quality, representativeness, and usefulness of public health surveillance and monitoring systems to plan and evaluate targeted public health interventions to eliminate health disparities.

scholarly journals Understanding and Addressing Latinx COVID-19 Disparities in Washington State

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 845-849
Author(s):  
Barbara Baquero ◽  
Carmen Gonzalez ◽  
Magaly Ramirez ◽  
Erica Chavez Santos ◽  
India J. Ornelas
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Public Health Surveillance ◽  
Health Inequities ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Surveillance ◽  
Washington State ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Taking Action

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed, and intensified, health inequities faced by Latinx in the United States. Washington was one of the first U.S. states to report cases of COVID-19. Public health surveillance shows that 31% of Washington cases are Latinx, despite being only 13% of the state population. Unjust policies related to immigration, labor, housing, transportation, and education have contributed to both past and existing inequities. Approximately 20% of Latinx are uninsured, leading to delays in testing and medical care for COVID-19, and early reports indicated critical shortages in professional interpreters and multilingual telehealth options. Washington State is taking action to address some of these inequities. Applying a health equity framework, we describe key factors contributing to COVID-19–related health inequities among Latinx populations, and how Washington State has aimed to address these inequities. We draw on these experiences to make recommendations for other Latinx communities experiencing COVID-19 disparities.

scholarly journals Measuring the HIV Care Continuum Using Public Health Surveillance Data in the United States

2015 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine R. Lesko ◽  
Lynne A. Sampson ◽  
William C. Miller ◽  
Jacquelyn Clymore ◽  
Peter A. Leone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
United States ◽  
Public Health Surveillance ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Surveillance ◽  
Surveillance Data ◽  
Hiv Care ◽  
Hiv Care Continuum ◽  
Care Continuum ◽  
Health Surveillance Data

scholarly journals Sexually transmitted infections situation is a cause for concern in Poland

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwona Rudnicka ◽  
S Majewski
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Sexually Transmitted Infections ◽  
Public Health Surveillance ◽  
Health Surveillance ◽  
Second World War ◽  
World War ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Second World

Public health surveillance of STIs began in Poland in 1946, in response to an epidemic of syphilis and gonorrhoea that occurred after the second world war

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document