scholarly journals The role of schools of public health: learning from history, looking to the future

2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 446-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Evans
2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-202
Author(s):  
Meredith Manze ◽  
Andrew Maroko ◽  
Marilyn Aguirre-Molina ◽  
P. Christopher Palmedo

Author(s):  
Phyllis Freeman ◽  
Anthony Robbins

AbstractSince Jenner's time, there have always been enthusiasts and skeptics about the role of vaccines in the prevention of disease. This introduction explains why, at this time, it is crucial to assess the historical role vaccines have played in limiting damage caused by infectious diseases, the role they can play in the future, and the technologies that are best suited to achieving optimal gains for public health and development worldwide.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tijhuis ◽  
K Ombrellaro ◽  
I Petrauskaite ◽  
A Vaidelauskaite ◽  
S Daňková ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The European Core Health Indicators (ECHI) list provides a 'snapshot' of European public health (including care). It is the result of consecutive EU-wide projects in response to a 1998 European Commission (EC) call to establish an indicator list as the core of the EU public health monitoring system. The current list contains 88 indicators, a large part of which have been implemented and used across the EU. Using ECHI to internationally compare public health aspects adds value to national health information. Currently, EC maintains a tool in which the indicators can be consulted. However, no formal governing entity exists. The aim of this study, under the Joint Action on Health Information (InfAct), is to explore the future of the policy guiding role of the ECHI list, the process of adapting and innovating the list and the role of current member state initiatives in this. Methods Relevant technical information, available via 'doc(umentation) sheets' dating from 2012, was subjected to an update process. Potential improvements in content (additions, deletions, and adjustments), overall balance and policy relevance were suggested by health information experts (via survey and expert meetings). This work will be expanded in the near future of InfAct. Results Peer-reviewed updates of the doc sheets included aligning with meta information from relevant data collecting bodies and reviving web links. A process to guide content changes to the list is in development, balancing sustainability and updates for public health policy. Online background ECHI information is disseminated via ECHI.eu. Conclusions Health information experts still consider the ECHI shortlist important for EU health policy, but it needs to be modernized and promoted. A formal structure is needed to ensure the highest value to EC and MS health policies. The future distributed research Infrastructure on population health (DIPoH) may host the shaping and governing the ECHI, in liaison with EC and MS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document