scholarly journals Glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: the impact of body weight, beta-cell function and patient education

QJM ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.B. CHAN
2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidhartha Das ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar Bhoi ◽  
A.K. Baliarsinha ◽  
Mirza Asraf Ali Baig

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. A226
Author(s):  
A Shearer ◽  
A Bagust ◽  
FJ Ampudia-Blasco ◽  
MJ TaylorJ ◽  
S Mendes da Costa

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 866-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Rathmann ◽  
Klaus Strassburger ◽  
Brenda Bongaerts ◽  
Pavel Bobrov ◽  
Oliver Kuss ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Groop ◽  
Esa-Matti Tolppanen

Abstract. This study was designed to evaluate the influence of age, duration of diabetes, relative body weight and glycaemic control on beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity in 250 patients with onset of nonketotic diabetes between the age of 35 and 70 years (Type 2 diabetes). Beta-cell function was assessed by measuring serum C-peptide concentrations after I mg of glucagon iv. It was not influenced by age, age at onset of diabetes nor by the duration of the disease. This suggests that progressive deterioration of beta-cell function with time is not a consistent finding in Type 2 diabetes. Insulin sensitivity, measured as the glucose disappearance rate, KITT, in response to iv-insulin, was not significantly influenced by age or age at onset, but decreased consistently with the duration of the disease (P < 0.001). Beta-cell function was not correlated to fasting blood glucose and HbA1 concentrations. In contrast, there was a strong inverse relationship between glycaemic control and insulin sensitivity (P < 0.001) indicating that decreased insulin sensitivity contributes to poor glycaemic control in these patients. Attempts to improve glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes should therefore include means to improve insulin sensitivity.


Diabetologia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 1390-1399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Kapitza ◽  
Kirsten Dahl ◽  
Jacob B. Jacobsen ◽  
Mads B. Axelsen ◽  
Anne Flint

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 78-OR
Author(s):  
FARHAT FATIMA ◽  
JØRAN HJELMESÆTH ◽  
KARE I. BIRKELAND ◽  
HANNE L. GULSETH ◽  
JENS K. HERTEL ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e002208
Author(s):  
Marcus Hompesch ◽  
Jahoon Kang ◽  
OakPil Han ◽  
Michael E Trautmann ◽  
Christopher H Sorli ◽  
...  

IntroductionTo evaluate the effects of efpeglenatide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), on gastric emptying, glucose metabolism, and islet beta-cell function versus liraglutide and placebo in people with type 2 diabetes.Research design and methodsThis phase Ib study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02059564) randomized participants (n=47) to three cohorts. Within the first two cohorts, participants were randomized to placebo, efpeglenatide 6 mg weekly (QW; first cohort), or efpeglenatide 16 mg monthly (QM; second cohort). The third cohort received liraglutide 1.8 mg daily (QD). Gastric emptying was assessed through the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of acetaminophen at baseline and steady state. Glucose metabolism and beta-cell function were assessed based on mixed-meal tolerance testing and a graded glucose infusion procedure.ResultsTreatment duration was approximately 3 months for efpeglenatide 16 mg QM and 1 month for efpeglenatide 6 mg QW and liraglutide. At peak drug concentrations, efpeglenatide 6 mg QW was non-inferior to liraglutide 1.8 mg QD in delaying gastric emptying, as assessed by acetaminophen PK (lower bound of 90% CI for the efpeglenatide:liraglutide ratio >0.8 for area under the curve (AUC)0–120, AUC0–180, AUC0–360 and maximum concentration (Cmax)). Efpeglenatide 16 mg QM did not decrease the rate of gastric emptying to as great an extent as liraglutide (ie, non-inferiority was not shown). Compared with liraglutide, both efpeglenatide dosing regimens demonstrated comparable or more favorable glucometabolic effects and improved beta-cell function. All gastrointestinal adverse events reported with efpeglenatide were mild or moderate in severity and transient over treatment and follow-up.ConclusionsThe glucometabolic effects of efpeglenatide 6 mg QW and 16 mg QM were comparable to liraglutide. Additional studies are necessary to further examine these benefits of efpeglenatide.Trial registration numberNCT02059564.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document