scholarly journals Unilateral versus bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation associated with interbody fusion in degenerative Lumbar spine diseases

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E E A Emara ◽  
S H Morad ◽  
A R Farghaly ◽  
O E Ahmed ◽  
M K Khalil
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Bilateral Group ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Lumbar interbody fusion is a recognized surgical technique in treatment of degenerative lumbar instability. Interbody fusion supplemented with pedicle screw fixation has several advantages over posterolateral fusion and has been advocated to improve fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Interbody fusion places the bone graft in the loadbearing position of the anterior and middle spinal columns thereby enhancing the potential for fusion. In addition, the interbody space has more vascularity than the posterolateral space, also increasing the potential for a solid fusion mass to form. Aim of the Work to assess safety and efficacy of unilateral pedicle screw fixation associated with interbody fusion in Lumbar spine degenerative diseases and to evaluate and compare outcomes of unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation associated with interbody fusion in lumbar spine degenerative diseases, as regard the operation time, bleeding, postoperative stay, cost, and the clinical and biomechanical results. Material & Methods This observational prospective comparative study of the 2 groups who were operated either unilateral (Group A /25 patients) or bilateral (Group B/25 patients) pedicle screw fixation with interbody fusion was done. Patients were followed up for 1, 6, 12 months. This study occurred at Ain Shams University hospitals. Results No differences were observed between the two groups with respect to demographic data. The patients of the two groups had significant improvement in functional outcome compared to preoperatively, except in early postoperative VAS back and ODI in unilateral group which is better than bilateral group. However, no significant difference noticed in the further follow up. There was no significant difference comparing fusion rate, complication rate and duration of hospital stay between the two groups at postoperative follow-up. There was significantly less blood loss, shorter postoperative pain killer use and significantly shorter operation time in the unilateral PS fixation group as compared with the bilateral PS fixation group in our study. Conclusion Our study suggested TLIF with unilateral PS fixation was as safe and effective as that with bilateral PS fixation. Unilateral PS fixation may significantly reduce the intraoperative blood loss and shorten the operation time, somewhat improve the clinical outcome scores of ODI and VAS Back without significant difference comparing fusion rate, complication rate and duration of hospital stay between the two groups at postoperative follow-up. BPSF with TLIF likely causes more degeneration at the cranial adjacent segment compared with UPSF techniques. However, the long-term follow up is required to demonstrate the impact of these findings.

Comparison of Pedicle Screw Fixation With or Without Cement Augmentation Combined With Single-segment Isthmic Spondylolisthesis in Osteoporotic Spine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-cheng Peng ◽  
Hui-zhi Guo ◽  
Chen-guang Zhan ◽  
Hua-sheng Huang ◽  
Yan-huai Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Isthmic Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Screw Loosening ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract PurposeThis study aims to investigate the necessity of cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.MethodFifty-nine cases were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-three cases were in the polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) group, and the other 26 cases were in the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) group. Evaluation data included operation time, intraoperative blood loss,hospitalization cost, hospitalization days, rates of fusion, screw loosening, bone cement leakage, visual analog scores (VAS) , Oswestry disability index (ODI) , Lumbar Lordosis（LL）, Pelvic Tilt（PT） and Sacral Slope（SS）. ResultsThe operation time and blood loss in the CPS group decreased significantly compared to the PMMA-PS group (P < 0.05). The average hospitalization cost of the PMMA group was significantly higher than that of the CPS group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference for the average hospital stay between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The initial and the last follow-up postoperative VAS and ODI improved significantly in the two groups (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in VAS and ODI at each time point between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The last postoperative spine-pelvic parameters were significantly improved compared with preoperation (P < 0.05). In the PMMA-PS group, the fusion rate was 100%. The fusion rate was 96.15% in the CPS group. No significant difference was found between the two groups for the fusion rate (P > 0.05). Nine cases in the PMMA-PS group had bone cement leakage (27.27%). There was not screw loosening in the PMMA-PS group. There were 2 cases of screw loosening in the CPS group. There were no significant differences in screw loosening, postoperative adjacent segment fractures, postoperative infection or postoperative revision between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe use of PMMA-PS on a regular basis is not recommended for posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.

scholarly journals Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiko Hiyama ◽  
Hiroyuki Katoh ◽  
Daisuke Sakai ◽  
Masato Sato ◽  
Masahiro Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Position Change ◽  
Dural Sac ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Indirect Decompression

Abstract Background There have been few comparisons between dual positions, which require a position change, and a single position, which does not require position change, and it is not clear whether there is a difference in indirect decompression achieved by the two procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare perioperative and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in two cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in a single position or dual position. Methods This study involved 45 patients who underwent indirect decompression at 68 levels, with LLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal canal stenosis. Patient demographics and perioperative data were compared between two groups: patients who remained in the lateral decubitus position for pedicle screw fixation (SP group) and those turned to the prone position (DP group). Results A total of 26 DP and 19 SP patients were analyzed. The operation time was approximately 31 min longer for the DP group (129.7 ± 36.0 min) than for the SP group (98.4 ± 41.3 min, P < 0.01). We also evaluated the pre- and postoperative image measurements, there was no significant difference for lumbar lordosis, segmental disc angle, slipping length, and disc height between the groups. The CSA of the dural sac (DP group, from 55.3 to 78.4 mm2; SP group, from 54.7 to 77.2 mm2) and central canal diameter (DP group, from 5.9 to 7.9 mm; SP group, from 5.6 to 7.7 mm) was significantly larger after surgery in both groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.684). Conclusions SP surgery could reduce the average surgery time by about 31 min. We found that the effect of indirect decompression by SP-PPS fixation following LLIF was considered to be a useful technique with no difference in dural sac enlargement or disc angle obtained compared with DP-PPS fixation.

scholarly journals Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiko Hiyama ◽  
Hiroyuki Katoh ◽  
Daisuke Sakai ◽  
Masato Sato ◽  
Masahiro Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Position Change ◽  
Dural Sac ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Indirect Decompression

Abstract Background: There have been few comparisons between dual positions, which require a position change, and a single position, which does not require position change, and it is not clear whether there is a difference in indirect decompression achieved by the two procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare perioperative and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in two cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in a single position or dual position. Methods: This study involved 45 patients who underwent indirect decompression at 68 levels, with LLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal canal stenosis. Patient demographics and perioperative data were compared between two groups: patients who remained in the lateral decubitus position for pedicle screw fixation (SP group) and those turned to the prone position (DP group). Results: A total of 26 DP and 19 SP patients were analyzed. The operation time was approximately 31 min longer for the DP group (129.7 ± 36.0 min) than for the SP group (98.4 ± 41.3 min, P < 0.01). We also evaluated the pre- and postoperative image measurements, there was no significant difference for lumbar lordosis, segmental disc angle, slipping length, and disc height between the groups. The CSA of the dural sac (DP group, from 55.3 to 78.4 mm2; SP group, from 54.7 to 77.2 mm2) and central canal diameter (DP group, from 5.9 to 7.9 mm; SP group, from 5.6 to 7.7 mm) was significantly larger after surgery in both groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.684). Conclusions: SP surgery could reduce the average surgery time by about 31 min. We found that the effect of indirect decompression by SP-PPS fixation following LLIF was considered to be a useful technique with no difference in dural sac enlargement or disc angle obtained compared with DP-PPS fixation.

Clinical outcomes and complications associated with pedicle screw fixation—augmented lumbar interbody fusion

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis J. Rivet ◽  
David Jeck ◽  
James Brennan ◽  
Adrian Epstein ◽  
Carl Lauryssen
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Fiber ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Repeated Surgery ◽  
Fine Print

Object. The authors conducted a prospective study to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications associated with uni- and bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) performed using carbon fiber Brantigan I/F Cages and pedicle screw fixation. Methods. Forty-two consecutive patients who had undergone uni- or bilateral TLIF between February 1999 and July 2000 were prospectively evaluated. Clinical outcome was graded using a modified Prolo Scale, the McGill Pain Index Scale, a follow-up questionnaire, and charts. An independent radiologist assessed radiological outcomes. All patients were followed for at least 1 year. Based on Prolo Scale scores, an excellent or good 1-year outcome was achieved in 73% of patients; 90% of patients responded that they would undergo the procedure again. At 1 year, radiographic fusion was demonstrated in 74% and was statistically related to clinical outcome (p < 0.05). There were no deaths or major hardware failures. Complications requiring repeated surgery included one case of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and one case in which the hemovac drain was retained. There were four cases involving minor wound infections, eight involving CSF leaks, and none requiring repeated surgery. On routine follow-up radiography one pedicle screw was found to be broken; the patient remained asymptomatic and fusion occurred. Conclusions. Unilateral and bilateral TLIF involving placement of carbon fiber cages and pedicle screw fixation are effective treatment options in patients with indications for lumbar arthrodesis. The procedures result in acceptable rates of fusion and clinical success, and a minimal incidence of morbidity when performed by an experienced surgeon.

scholarly journals Comparison of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty with or without Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Dichao Huang ◽  
Jichong Ying ◽  
Dingli Xu ◽  
Jianming Chen ◽  
Jianlei Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Vertebral Fractures ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Fixation Failure ◽  
Percutaneous Kyphoplasty ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. Osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures have become a great social burden due to the aging tendency of population. This study is aimed at comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous kyphoplasty with or without pedicle screw fixation in patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. Hypothesis. There is a difference in clinical outcomes between percutaneous kyphoplasty with pedicle screw fixation and percutaneous kyphoplasty. Methods. This retrospective study included 87 patients who received percutaneous kyphoplasty with or without pedicle screw fixation between October 2015 and October 2017 at Ningbo No.6 Hospital and were followed for 2 years. A total of 40 patients received percutaneous kyphoplasty with pedicle screw fixation (PKPF group), and the other 47 patients had percutaneous kyphoplasty only (PKP group). The outcomes were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Cobb angle (CA), and anterior vertebra height rate (AVHr), which were calculated at preoperative admission and each follow-up visit. Complications including postoperative back pain, refracture, and fixation failure were collected from medical records. Results. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics or preoperative data between the two groups ( p < 0.05 ) but significantly better improvements in VAS, ODI, CA, and AVHr at 12- and 24-month follow-up visits in the PKPF group compared with those of the PKP group. 23 (48.9%) patients in the PKP group had complications, whereas only 5 (12.5%) patients in the PKPF group presented complications including 2 postoperative back pain and 1 fixation failure ( p = 0.04 ). Conclusions. PKPF obtained longer correction and better improvement in VAS, ODI, and CA in patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures than PKP.

scholarly journals A Comparison of the Bridge-type ROI-C Interbody Fusion Cage System and Titanium Mesh Graft With Titanium Plate Fixation in 2-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating and Cage System: A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangjun He ◽  
Zhangzhe Zhou ◽  
Xiaofeng Shao ◽  
Changhao Zhang ◽  
Xinfeng Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Cage System ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Bridge Type ◽  
Group B ◽  
Fusion Cage

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and radioactive results of the bridge-type ROI-C interbody fusion cage (ROI-C) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating and cage system (ACDF) for cervical spondylopathy. Methods From January 2014 to January 2018, 45 patients undergoing ACDF were retrospectively analyzed, including 24 cases of ROI-C (group A) and 21 cases of ACDF (group B). The operation time, blood loss, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), postoperative complications, imaging results including cervical Cobb angle and fusion were compared between groups. Results All patients were successfully treated with surgery, and no cerebrospinal fluid leakage, esophageal fistula, or hoarseness occurred after surgery. The operation time and blood loss in group A were lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). During the follow-up period, JOA score increased and NDI score decreased after operation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of dysphagia in group A was lower than that in group B at 1 month and 3 months after operation (P < 0.05), but the final follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia between the two groups (P > 0.05). In group A, the fusion rate was 83.3% 3 months after surgery and 100% at the last follow-up. The rate of adjacent level ossification development was 12.5%. In group B, the fusion rate was 85.7% 3 months after surgery and 100% at the last follow-up. The rate of adjacent level ossification development was 23.8%. Conclusion Both ROI-C and ACDF can achieve satisfactory results, but ROI-C has shorter operation time, less bleeding and lower incidence of dysphagia in the short term.

A 10-Year Follow-up Evaluation of Lumbar Spine Fusion With Pedicle Screw Fixation

Spine ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 1390-1395 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Glaser ◽  
Mark Stanley ◽  
Hutha Sayre ◽  
Joyce Woody ◽  
Ernest Found ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Spine Fusion ◽  
Lumbar Spine Fusion

scholarly journals Posterior lumber interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation for the management of spondylolisthesis: An analysis of 40 cases

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Md. Rezaul Amin ◽  
Md. Atikur Rahman ◽  
Akhlaque Hossain Khan ◽  
Haradhan Devnath ◽  
A. B. M. Manwar Hossain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Pedicle Screw Fixation ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Pedicle Fixation ◽  
Graphic Rating Scale

<p class="Abstract">Spondylolisthesis is forward slipping of upper vertebra in relations to its lower one, commonest is L4-L5. The ideal surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis is still controversial. Posterior lumber interbody fusion with pedicle fixation is one of treatment choices for the lumber spondylolisthesis. Forty patient who operated through posterior lumber interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation by single surgeon was included from January 2012 to March 2015. Periodical follow-up was done both clinically and radiologically up to 6 months. Patient outcome was completed based on pain relief graphic rating scale and Oswestry disability index. In our series, the excellent outcome were 25 patients (62.5%), good were 12 patients (30%), and fair were 3 patients (7.5%). There were no poor outcome and no new neurological deficit. This study concludes that posterior lumber inter-body fusion with pedicle is an effective treatment for the lumber spondylolisthesis. It helps to maintain the biomechanics, associated with less complication and improve the quality of life of patient.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document