A Comparative Study between Round Block Technique and Standard Wide Local Excision in Breast Cancer Patients

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Abd El-Raouf Ali Abd El-Naser ◽  
Dina Hany Ahmed ◽  
Mohamed Shawky Mohamed

Abstract Background The goal of optimizing the cosmetic and oncologic outcomes of BCS has been addressed in recent years by the emergence of the field of oncoplastic surgery, that originally defined as an assortment of volume replacement techniques performed by plastic surgeons to replace all or part of the resected breast volume with myocutaneous tissue flaps. The definition of oncoplastic surgery has more recently been expanded to include a wide range of volume displacement or volume redistribution procedures performed by breast surgeons and general surgeons to optimize breast shape and breast volume following breast cancer surgery. Aim of the Work To assess the round block technique as regard oncological safety, surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction comparing results with standard wide local excision. Patients and Methods This is a prospective randomized study to assess the round block technique as an oncological procedure for management of early breast cancer near to nipple-areola complex as regard oncological safety, surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction comparing results with standard wide local excision. Twenty breast cancer patients are subdivided into group (A) 10 females which underwent round block technique and group (B) 10 femaleswhich underwent standard wide local excision. Patient and tumor criteria including age, co morbidities, tumor size and distance between tumor and nipple-areola complex were considered to be non-significant between 2 groups so the only difference is the surgical technique. Results The round block technique and SWLE have the same results regarding operative time, intra-operative blood loss and post operative complications with the advantage to RBT because of its better cosmetic outcomes and lower re-excision rates. So, the round block technique is superior to SWLE in selected cases. Conclusion The round block technique has comparable operative parameters to SWLE with no evidence of increased surgical complications. With a lower re-excision rates and better cosmoses were observed in the round block patients as it is scarless operation without nipple and areola shift suggesting that the round block technique is superior to SWLE in selected cases.

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraf Abd El Moghny ◽  
Karim Fahmy ◽  
Ahmed Khalil Mohamed

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women all over the world representing 18% of all women reported cases of cancer. It represents the leading cause of women mortality as representing 23% of all women cancer deaths. The decision in any breast cancer patient is taken by MDT that includes breast surgery consultant, pathology consultant, plastic surgery consultant, radiology consultant and medical oncology consultant. Breast conserving surgeries are now the standard technique for management of breast cancer patient. Oncoplastic techniques are replacing SWLE for their better cosmetic outcomes and better exposure of the tumor. Objective The aim of this work was to assess the round block technique as regard oncological safety, surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction comparing results with standard wide local excision. Methods This is a retrospective study to assess the round block technique as an oncological procedure for management of early breast cancer near to nipple-areola complex as regard oncological safety, surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction comparing results with standard wide local excision. It was conducted at general surgery department, Ain Shams university hospitals. Approval of the Ethical Committee and written informed consent from all participants were obtained. In our study 40 breast cancer patients are subdivided into group (A) 20 females which underwent round block technique and group (B) 20 femaleswhich underwent standard wide local excision. Patient and tumor criteria including age, co morbidities, tumor size and distance between tumor and nipple-areola complex were considered to be nonsignificant between 2 groups so the only difference is the surgical technique. Results The study shows that the round block technique and SWLE have the same results regarding hospital stay, post operative complications and oncological recurrence with the advantage to RBT because of its better cosmetic outcomes. So, the round block technique is superior to SWLE in selected cases. Conclusion The round block technique has comparable post operative parameters with better cosmoses as it is scarless operation without nipple and areola shift suggesting that the round block technique is superior to SWLE in selected cases.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-597
Author(s):  
Aziz Zikiryakhodzhaev ◽  
Nadezhda Volchenko ◽  
Erik Saribekyan ◽  
Yelena Rasskazova

The article presents data about the lesion of the nipple-areola complex in breast cancer. In 2015-2016 surgical treatment was performed in 101 breast cancer patients, different in size but with the mandatory removal of the nipple-areola complex. There are analyzed the dependence of the lesion of the nipple-areola complex from histological types of breast cancer, molecular subtypes, multicentricity, the location of tumor in the breast. The most significant criterion was the dependence of the lesion of the nipple-areola complex from the distance between tumor node and the nipple.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 380
Author(s):  
WaelElsayed Lotfy Mokhtar ◽  
AdelMohamed Ismail ◽  
MohamedAhmed El Gharbawi ◽  
YehiaAli El-Alfy ◽  
MaiMohammed Abdelwahab

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rivolin ◽  
Franziska Kubatzki ◽  
Francesco Marocco ◽  
Laura Martincich ◽  
Stefania Renditore ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 62-62
Author(s):  
Bree Ruppert Eaton ◽  
Tian Liu ◽  
Xiaofeng Yang ◽  
Donna Mister ◽  
Yize Zhao ◽  
...  

62 Background: Previous studies have reported that breast cancer patients with high stress levels at diagnosis develop more frequent and severe side effects of chemotherapy treatment. However, the relationship between stress and radiotherapy (RT) related treatment toxicity has not been evaluated. We investigated whether baseline stress is associated with worse acute skin toxicity in women undergoing breast RT. Methods: Between March 2010 and April 2013, 80 post-lumpectomy breast cancer patients were enrolled on a prospective study prior to undergoing definitive whole breast RT (50 Gy plus a 10 Gy boost). Prior to RT (baseline), at week 6 of RT (T2), and 6 weeks post RT (T3), subjects completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and underwent objective ultrasound measurements of epidermal thickness over the lumpectomy cavity and in all four quadrants of the treated breast. A skin thickness ratio (STRA) was generated by normalizing for measurements taken of the untreated breast. RT-induced skin toxicity was assessed by measuring the change in STRA from baseline to T2 and T3. Results: Mean STRA increased by 23% (SD 27%) and 33% (SD 25%) from baseline to T2 and T3, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed PSS score at baseline (p=.04), body mass index (p=.03), maximum RT dose (Dmax) (p=.02) and whole breast volume (p<.001) were significantly associated with increased changes in STRA during RT. Depression, fatigue, race, chemotherapy, patient age, and tumor stage were not associated with changes in STRA. On multivariate analysis, PSS (p=.05), breast volume (p=.004), and Caucasian race (p=.04) were associated with greater acute changes in STRA from baseline to T2. Breast volume (p=.01), but not PSS, predicted for greater changes in STRA 6 weeks after RT was completed. Conclusions: In women with breast cancer, a high level of perceived stress prior to RT is associated with more severe acute skin toxicity during RT but not after RT is completed. Strategies to reduce stress prior to RT may improve tolerance of treatment.


1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 609-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Laronga ◽  
Bonnie Kemp ◽  
Dennis Johnston ◽  
Geoffrey L. Robb ◽  
S. Eva Singletary

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. AB066-AB066
Author(s):  
Niamh O’Halloran ◽  
Sonja Khan ◽  
Katie Gilligan ◽  
Michael Kerin ◽  
Aoife Lowery

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document