Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) For Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Thrombotic Complications in Children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwa W Nasef ◽  
Maha M El-gaffary ◽  
Mervet G Mansour ◽  
Esraa S Abd El Aty

Abstract Objective To determine the efficacy of unfractionated heparin in reducing central venous catheter-related deep venous thrombosis and/or catheter thrombotic occlusion in children by systematically searching the literature and conducting a meta-analysis study. Methods Four electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Elsevier’s thrombosis journal, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials) were searched for journal peer-reviewed articles published in the period from Jan 2000 to Dec 2018. The search criteria included observational studies, and randomized controlled trials on patients aged 0–18 years with central venous catheters (CVC), which compare between the effect of UFH (flushes, lock solutions, continuous infusion, and heparin bonded catheter) and no prophylaxis (Normal saline flush or no treatment) for the prevention of CVC thrombotic complications (CVC-related deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or catheter thrombotic occlusion). Two authors independently reviewed and identified the eligible studies, which were assessed for study methodology including bias, and extraction of unadjusted data whenever available. To pool data from eligible studies, the meta-analysis was performed on RevMan version 5.3. Odds ratios were generated with the corresponding 95% CI through the random-effect model. Results Of the 413 articles identified, only eight studies were eligible with 1380 patients. Our results revealed that UFH was significantly superior on control group in reducing thrombotic occlusion and/or CVC-related DVT (odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19:0.8) (p 0.01). Conclusion The published data support the hypothesis that using UFH as a thromboprophylaxis may significantly reduce catheter thrombotic complication in pediatric patients with CVC.

2012 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1159-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian W. Gray ◽  
Raquel Gonzalez ◽  
Kavita S. Warrier ◽  
Lauren A. Stephens ◽  
Robert A. Drongowski ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan A. Gutierrez ◽  
Rochelle Bagatell ◽  
Meredith P. Samson ◽  
Andreas A. Theodorou ◽  
Robert A. Berg

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (01) ◽  
pp. 052-056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Faustino

AbstractThe presence of a central venous catheter and admission to the intensive care unit are the most important risk factors for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in children. At least 18% of critically ill children with a catheter develop radiologically confirmed catheter-associated thrombosis. Clinically apparent thrombosis occurs in 3% of critically ill children with a catheter and is associated with 8 additional days of mechanical ventilation. Even when the thrombus is initially asymptomatic, 8 to 18% of critically ill children with catheter-associated thrombosis develop postthrombotic syndrome. Thrombosis is uncommon within 24 hours after insertion of a nontunneled catheter in critically ill children, but nearly all thrombi have developed by 4 days after insertion. Hypercoagulability during or immediately after insertion of the catheter plays an essential role in the development of thrombosis. Pharmacologic prophylaxis, including local anticoagulation with heparin-bonded catheter, has not been shown to reduce the risk of catheter-related thrombosis in children. Systemic anticoagulation in critically ill children started soon after the insertion of the catheter, however, may be beneficial. A multicenter clinical trial that is testing this hypothesis is currently underway.


2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1655-1656
Author(s):  
M. Kim ◽  
H. Kwon ◽  
S.-K. Hong ◽  
Y. Han ◽  
H. Park ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document