scholarly journals Planted Loblolly Pine Survival and Growth Responses to Herbaceous Vegetation Control

1996 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmie L. Yeiser ◽  
Richard A. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Sandy Loam ◽  
First Year ◽  
Growth Responses ◽  
Herbaceous Vegetation ◽  
Vegetation Control ◽  
Growing Seasons ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Pinus Taeda L ◽  
Over The Top

Abstract Plots in 13 loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations established on sandy or sandy-loam soils in SE Oklahoma and SW Arkansas received herbaceous vegetation control using hexazinone and sulfometuron methyl. Treatments consisted of a one-time herbicide application over-the-top of loblolly pine seedlings by one of three methods: spot, band, or broadcast. At the end of 1 and 5 growing seasons, data were collected for survival, height, and diameter growth and compared for seedlings in areas untreated and treated for herbaceous vegetation control. Only data corresponding to herbicide rates and application methods labeled for use today are included in data analysis. When compared with untreated checks, seedlings treated for herbaceous vegetation control exhibited significant increases in first-year survival at 11 sites and in height and groundline diameter (GLD) at 12 of the 13 test sites. At the end of 1 growing season, herbaceous vegetation control provided mean seedling increases of 16.7%, 0.4 ft, and 0.1 in. for survival, height, and GLD, respectively. After 5 growing seasons, advantages from herbaceous vegetation control had increased with significant differences existing in survival, height, and diameter at breast height (dbh) on 10 of 11 test sites, as 2 sites were lost to wildfire. Numerically, treatment differences had increased to 18.4%, 2.4 ft, and 0.6 in. for survival, height, and dbh, respectively. South. J. Appl. For. 20(1):53-57.

Loblolly pine growth response to herbaceous vegetation control at different planting densities

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 960-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Quicke ◽  
Glenn Glover ◽  
Ralph S Meldahl
Keyword(s):  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Basal Area ◽  
Planting Density ◽  
Herbaceous Vegetation ◽  
Vegetation Control ◽  
Volume Yield ◽  
Volume Response ◽  
Adjustment Term ◽  
Pinus Taeda L ◽  
Positive Effect

Growth of Pinus taeda L., with and without control of competing herbaceous vegetation, was evaluated over 15 years at planting densities ranging from 747 to 2990 trees/ha. A height response to vegetation control of 0.9 m at age 5 decreased to 0.3 m at age 15. Convergence in the cumulative height between treated and untreated stands did not translate into converging basal area and volume yield. For 1500 and 2200 trees/ha, volume response to early vegetation control increased to age 15. For 800 trees/ha volume gains increased to age 12 and were stable between ages 12 and 15. Higher densities apparently captured more of the site resources made available through vegetation control. Age-15 volume gains for 2200, 1500, and 800 trees/ha were 71 (23%), 48 (17%), and 19 m3·ha-1 (8%), respectively. A separate adjustment term in height and basal-area models captured the short-term positive effect of vegetation control on height growth and longer term basal-area responses. Previously published height and basal-area models were modified to account for planting-density effects.

Stand level pine response to occupancy of woody shrub and herbaceous vegetation

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 979-984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwight K Lauer ◽  
Glenn R Glover
Keyword(s):  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Basal Area ◽  
Pinus Elliottii ◽  
First Year ◽  
Shrub Cover ◽  
Herbaceous Vegetation ◽  
Vegetation Control ◽  
Competing Vegetation ◽  
Dominant Height ◽  
Stand Basal Area

The relationship between age-5 pine height and vegetation cover was estimated for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) stands using regression analysis. This paper utilizes results from four locations of a vegetation control study that included herbicide treatments to control woody shrub and herbaceous vegetation. Age-5 average dominant height was predicted from first-year herbaceous cover, untreated first-year shrub cover, and fifth-year shrub cover. Dominant height increased 0.5 m for each decrease of about 30% in either first year herbaceous cover, untreated first-year shrub cover, or year-5 shrub cover. Lack of vegetation control on beds where vegetation was allowed to recolonize before planting reduced dominant height an additional 0.5 m. A competition index was constructed that estimates the difference between "potential" and actual age-5 pine height. Stand-level models were developed to link age-5 pine height and occupancy of competing vegetation to quadratic mean DBH, specific DBH percentiles, and stand basal area. The effects of interspecific competition on stand basal area and diameter percentiles could be accounted for through the effects of competing vegetation on dominant height except for treatments that did not control woody shrubs.

Recovery of 1-year-old loblolly pine seedlings from simulated browse damage

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G Shelton ◽  
Michael D Cain
Keyword(s):  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Quantitative Information ◽  
First Year ◽  
Seedling Mortality ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Pinus Taeda L ◽  
Multiple Stems

Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings are frequently browsed by a wide variety of animals during the first few years of their development. Although anecdotal observations indicate that the potential for seedling recovery is good, there is little quantitative information on the factors affecting the recovery process. Thus, we conducted a study to evaluate the effects of the extent and season of simulated browse damage on the recovery of 1-year-old loblolly pine seedlings under controlled conditions. Seedlings were clipped at five positions: at the midpoint between the root collar and cotyledons and so that 25, 50, 75, and 100% of the height between the cotyledons and the terminal remained after clipping. Clipping treatments were applied in two seasons: winter and spring. All seedlings clipped below the cotyledons died, confirming that dormant buds or lateral shoots are required for recovery. Survival of seedlings clipped above the cotyledons was 97% for winter clipping and 96% for spring clipping. Most of the seedling mortality (73%) was for seedlings with only 25% of their height remaining. Regression analysis revealed that second-year seedling size was positively affected by first-year size and percentage of remaining height after clipping and that seedlings clipped in winter were larger at 2 years than those clipped during spring. Logistic regression indicated a higher probability of multiple stems resulting from the more severe clipping treatments. Clipping season and severity also significantly affected the probability for tip moth (Rhyacionia spp.) damage, which occurred more frequently in the larger seedlings. Results suggest that planting seedlings deep, with the cotyledons just below ground level, may be an advantage in areas where browse damage is common.

Hardwood Eradication Improves Productivity of Thinned Loblolly Pine Stands

1984 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Clason
Keyword(s):  
Pinus Taeda ◽  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Volume Growth ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Detectable Effect ◽  
Herbaceous Vegetation ◽  
Vegetation Control ◽  
Pine Stands ◽  
Pinus Taeda L

Abstract A single hardwood eradication treatment in a 7-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stand along with pine stocking control increased growth and yield over a 10-year period. Herbaceous vegetation control had no detectable effect at ages 12 and 17. Treated plots had smaller stems, which could be controlled more readily by fire, although the number of understory stems was similar for all treatments. Mean annual radial and merchantable volume growth on treated plots surpassed controls by 30%. Future stand values were enhanced by removing hardwood competition. Residual stand sawtimber volumes on the treated plots were twice that of the control.

Tenth-Year Results of Herbaceous Weed Control in a Loblolly Pine Plantation

1994 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Haywood
Keyword(s):  
Pinus Taeda ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Untreated Control ◽  
Pine Plantation ◽  
Herbaceous Vegetation ◽  
Growing Seasons ◽  
Volume Production ◽  
Herbaceous Weed Control ◽  
Pinus Taeda L

Abstract Herbaceous weed control influenced the growth of planted loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) over a 10-yr-period. Five treatments were examined: (1) Untreated control: seedlings were planted in the established herbaceous vegetation; (2) Glyphosate: glyphosate was broadcast in September 1981 before planting; (3) Disked: plots were cross-disked in September 1981 before planting; (4) Glyphosate-PPWC: glyphosate was broadcast before planting as in Treatment 2, and postplant weed control (PPWC) herbicides were broadcast yearly for 4 yr (1982, atrazine plus simazine ; 1983, atrazine plus oxyfluorfen; 1984 and 1985, hexazinone ); and (5) Disked-PPWC: plots were disked before planting as in Treatment 3, and the PPWC herbicides were broadcast as in Treatment 4. Four years of PPWC did not affect survival and resulted in greater height, dbh, and volume per loblolly pine through 10 growing seasons. The disked-PPWC plots were the most productive through 8 growing seasons, but higher than average mortality after 8 yr on the disked-PPWC treatment resulted in the glyphosate-PPWC plots producing more volume per acre after 10 growing seasons. Total volume production was 253 inside bark ft³/ac greater on the two PPWC treatments than on the untreated controls. South. J. Appl. For. 18(3): 105-109.

Early Field Performance of Loblolly Pine Seedlings with Pisolithus Tinctorius Ectomycorrhizae on Two Lower Coastal Plain Sites

1983 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory N. Leach ◽  
Homer H. Gresham
Keyword(s):  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Coastal Plain ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
Pisolithus Tinctorius ◽  
Growing Seasons ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Bare Root ◽  
Pinus Taeda L ◽  
Lower Coastal Plain ◽  
Growth Of Seedlings

Abstract Bare root seedlings of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) with Pisolithus tinctorius (Pers.) Coker and Couch (Pt) ectomycorrhizae were outplanted on typical reforestation sites in the lower coastal plain in Florida and Georgia. After two growing seasons, survival and height growth of seedlings with heavy Pt colonization at planting were not significantly different from control seedlings naturally infected with other ectomycorrhizae. Mycelial inoculum added to the nursery soil resulted in greater Pt colonization of seedlings than basidiospore inoculum applied in an inert coating on encapsulated seed.

scholarly journals Influence of herbaceous and woody competition on white pine regeneration in a uniform shelterwood

2011 ◽  
Vol 87 (05) ◽  
pp. 653-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Pitt ◽  
Andrée Morneault ◽  
William Parker ◽  
Len Lanteigne ◽  
Michael Hoepting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Growth ◽  
Deciduous Trees ◽  
White Pine ◽  
Herbaceous Vegetation ◽  
Vegetation Control ◽  
Growing Seasons ◽  
Light Levels ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Pine Regeneration ◽  
Survival And Growth

We investigated the effects of herbaceous and woody vegetation control on the survival and growth of planted and natural eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) seedlings through six growing seasons following a uniform shelterwood regeneration harvest on two independent sites. Subsequent to chain scarification, white pine seedlings were planted at 2-m spacing, augmenting natural regeneration (full stocking and >3000 seedlings per ha). Herbaceous vegetation control involved the suppression of grasses, forbs, ferns, and low shrubs, and was maintained for zero, two, or four growing seasons after planting. Woody control involved the removal of all tall shrubs and deciduous trees, and was conducted at the time of planting, at the end of the second or fifth growing seasons, or not at all. White pine seedling growth responded positively to increased duration of herbaceous vegetation control and negatively to delayed woody control. Maximum growth was not realized unless both types of vegetation were suppressed. During the first six growing seasons, the height growth of planted pine was more than twice that of naturally regenerating pine, regardless of tending regime. The study suggests that successful white pine regeneration may be achieved by thinning from below to allow 50% to 60% of full sunlight in the understory, followed by the proactive, early suppression of woody and herbaceous vegetation to maintain optimum light levels and reduce competition for soil moisture and nutrients.

scholarly journals Hand-Lifting Improves Field Performance of Loblolly Pine Seedlings

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-135
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Greene ◽  
S. Tannis Danley
Keyword(s):  
Pinus Taeda ◽  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Field Performance ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Stem Volume ◽  
Growing Seasons ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Pinus Taeda L

Abstract Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seedlings were lifted from two Georgia nurseries and planted on six sites in Georgia and Alabama during the winter of 1997/1998. Survival, height, and groundline diameters were measured after two growing seasons. Hand-lifted seedlings from both nurseries were taller than machine-lifted seedlings across all sites by 7–14 cm, resulting in stem volume index increases of 19–30% over 2 yr. Survival of hand-lifted seedlings was higher (P < 0.05) for the nursery using a two-row belt lifter. Seedlings from outer drills at this nursery were 10 cm taller and produced 21% more stem volume after 2 yr than seedlings from inner drills. South. J. Appl. For. 25(3):131–135.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Selective Postemergence Herbicides for Yellow Nutsedge Control and Loblolly and Slash Pine Seedling Tolerance

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-131
Author(s):  
D. Paul Jackson ◽  
Charles H. Gilliam ◽  
David B. South
Keyword(s):  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Pinus Elliottii ◽  
Height Growth ◽  
Slash Pine ◽  
Cyperus Esculentus ◽  
Yellow Nutsedge ◽  
Pine Seedlings ◽  
Pinus Taeda L ◽  
Postemergence Herbicides ◽  
Over The Top

Abstract Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) is a difficult weed to control in conifer nurseries. Soil fumigation with methyl bromide has been used to control yellow nutsedge for years but may not be available in the future. For this reason, the objective of this research was to identify herbicides that can control yellow nutsedge but do not injure loblolly (Pinus taeda L.) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) when used over-the-top of seedlings. Yellow nutsedge tubers and loblolly and slash pine seedlings were potted separately, and treated with three rates of the herbicides mesotrione (Callisto®), imazosulfuron (Valent-V10142), and halosulfuron (Sedgehammer®). Imazosulfuron and halosulfuron provided the best suppression of nutsedge, but imazosulfuron injured loblolly and slash pine. Slash pine diameter and height growth were reduced by imazosulfuron. Halosulfuron did not affect loblolly pine but it reduced slash pine height growth and the number of new leaders (spring flush growth) the following spring. Mesotrione injured slash pine but provided intermediate control of yellow nutsedge. Halosulfuron applied at 35 to 140 g ai·ha−1 (active ingredient per hectare) over the top of loblolly pine (≥ 60 cm height and ≥ 8 mm diameter) can control yellow nutsedge without injuring pine seedlings.

scholarly journals Vegetation Cover Response and Second-Year Loblolly and Slash Pine Response Following Bedding and Pre- and Post-Plant Herbicide Applications in Florida

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwight K. Lauer ◽  
Bruce R. Zutter
Keyword(s):  
Loblolly Pine ◽  
Site Preparation ◽  
Slash Pine ◽  
First Year ◽  
Double Pass ◽  
Herbaceous Vegetation ◽  
Vegetation Control ◽  
Herbicide Treatments ◽  
Woody Shrubs ◽  
Second Year

Abstract Site preparation treatments of early single bed (EB), late single bed (LB), double bed (DB), EB + banded pre-plant herbicide (PP), and EB + broadcast pre-plant herbicide (BPP) were applied to four locations in Florida. Three of the four locations included these treatments crossed with a first-year post-plant herbicide application to control herbaceous vegetation(HC). Second-year pine heights evaluated at two slash pine (P. elliottii Engelm.) locations and one loblolly pine (P. taeda L.) location averaged taller (4.6 vs. 3.5 ft) following double-pass (DB, PP, BPP) than single-pass (EB, LB) treatments, taller (4.9 vs. 4.0 ft) for pre-plant herbicide (PP, BPP) than DB, but did not differ between PP and BPP. There were no significant interactions between site preparation and HC with HC, increasing second-year pine height by 0.5 ft. Pine height was greater for pre-plant herbicide treatments than for DB treatments because pre-plant herbicide treatments provided better control of competing vegetation. Vegetation control differed among treatments. DB improved control of woody shrubs over single bedding alone, but increased herbaceous cover in the first growing season. The increase in herbaceous cover following DB accounts for the relatively small gain in second-year pine height (0.2 ft) for DB compared to LB. Pre-plant herbicide treatments following early bedding improved control of both woody shrubs and first-year herbaceous vegetation. Pre-plant herbicide treatments also shifted the composition of herbaceous vegetation towards less competitive species. HC improved control of herbaceous plants, and lowest first-year herbaceous cover was achieved with the combination of HC with pre-plant herbicide treatments. South. J. Appl. For. 25(2):75–83.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document