scholarly journals P003 The impact of forced wake from overnight polysomnography on multiple sleep latency test results

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A22-A23
Author(s):  
A Amaranayake ◽  
S Frenkel ◽  
P Lyell ◽  
A Southcott

Abstract Introduction The multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) is used to diagnose disorders of hypersomnolence. Although internationally-recognised protocols do not stipulate whether patients should be woken from the preceding overnight polysomnography (PSG), many labs wake their patients for logistic reasons. This study analyses the impact on PSG and MSLT parameters of forced wake (FW) from the overnight PSG compared with unrestricted sleep (US). Methods 400 consecutive patients (FW=200; US=200) undergoing PSG/MSLT were included and the following parameters were compared: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire score (MEQ), PSG total sleep time (TST), wake-up time from the PSG, overall MSLT sleep latency (MSL), individual nap latencies (SLNap 1–4), number of MSLT naps with sleep-onset REM periods (#SOREMP), and percentage of MSLTs with overall MSL<8 minutes (%MSLT<8). Results The 2 groups were well-matched for ESS and MEQ. The FW group had more males (49% vs 39%). When compared to FW, patients with US had longer TST (+38 minutes; p=<0.0001), later wake-up time (+52 minutes; p<0.0001), longer MSL (+1.9 minutes; p=0.0049), 50% fewer #SOREMP (p=0.0224), and 16% fewer %MSLT<8 (p=0.0018). SLNap1 increased by 1.5 minutes (p=0.0623), SLNap2 increased by 2.0 minutes (p=0.0067), SLNap3 increased by 0.75minutes (p=0.0533) and SLNap4 increased by 2.5 minutes (p=0.0059). Discussion Allowing patients to have unrestricted sleep on the night prior to the MSLT resulted in significantly longer TST, longer sleep latencies during the MSLT, fewer SOREMP and fewer tests with MSL<8 minutes. International protocols should stipulate unrestricted sleep on the PSG prior to the MSLT to improve diagnostic accuracy.

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A477-A477
Author(s):  
Kamal Patel ◽  
Bianca J Lang

Abstract Introduction Presence of sleep onset REM episodes often raises concerns of narcolepsy. However other conditions have shown to have presence of sleep on REM episodes which include but not limited to obstructive sleep apnea, sleep wake schedule disturbance, alcoholism, neurodegenerative disorders, depression and anxiety Report of Case Here we present a case of 30 year old female with history of asthma, patent foraman ovale, migraine headache, and anxiety who presented with daytime sleepiness, falling asleep while at work, occasional scheduled naps, non-restorative sleep, sleep paralysis, and hypnopompic hallucination. Pertinent physical exam included; mallampati score of 4/4, retrognathia, high arched hard palate, crowded posterior oropharynx. She had a score of 16 on Epworth sleepiness scale. Patient previously had multiple sleep latency test at outside facility which revealed 4/5 SOREM, with mean sleep onset latency of 11.5 minutes. She however was diagnosed with narcolepsy and tried on modafinil which she failed to tolerate. She was tried on sertraline as well which was discontinued due to lack of benefit. She had repeat multiple sleep latency test work up which revealed 2/5 SOREM, with mean sleep onset latency was 13.1 minutes. Her overnight polysomnogram prior to repeat MSLT showed SOREM with sleep onset latency of 10 minutes. Actigraphy showed consistent sleep pattern overall with sufficient sleep time but was taking hydroxyzine and herbal medication. Patient did not meet criteria for hypersomnolence disorder and sleep disordered breathing. Conclusion There is possibility her medication may have played pivotal role with her daytime symptoms. We also emphasize SOREMs can be present in other disorders such as anxiety in this case and not solely in narcolepsy


2006 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 958-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Siqueira Waihrich ◽  
Raimundo Nonato Delgado Rodrigues ◽  
Henrique Aragão Silveira ◽  
Fernando da Fonseca Melo Fróes ◽  
Guilherme Henrique da Silva Rocha

OBJECTIVE: To compare MSLT parameters in two groups of patients with daytime sleepiness, correlated to the occurrence and onset of dreams. METHOD: Patients were submitted to the MSLT between January/1999 and June/2002. Sleep onset latency, REM sleep latency and total sleep time were determined. The occurrence of dreams was inquired following each MSLT series. Patients were classified as narcoleptic (N) or non-narcoleptic (NN). RESULTS: Thirty patients were studied, 12 were classified as narcoleptics (N group; 40%), while the remaining 18 as non-narcoleptic (NN group; 60%). Thirty MSLT were performed, resulting in 146 series. Sleep was detected in 126 series (86%) and dreams in 56 series (44.44%). Mean sleep time in the N group was 16.0±6.3 min, while 10.5±7.5 min in the NN group (p<0.0001). Mean sleep latency was 2.0±2.2 min and 7.2±6.0 min in the N and NN group, respectively (p<0.001). Mean REM sleep latency in the N group was 3.2±3.1min and 6.9±3.7 min in the NN group (p=0.021). Dreams occurred in 56.9% of the N group series and 28.4% in that of the NN group (p=0.0009). Dream frequency was detected in 29.8% and 75% of the NREM series of the N and NN groups, respectively (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients from the N group, compared to the NN group, slept longer and earlier, demonstrated a shorter REM sleep onset and greater dream frequency. NN patients had a greater dream frequency in NREM series. Thus, the occurrence of dreams during NREM in the MSLT may contribute to differentially diagnose narcolepsy and daytime sleepiness.


Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
pp. e1034-e1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Pizza ◽  
Lucie Barateau ◽  
Isabelle Jaussent ◽  
Stefano Vandi ◽  
Elena Antelmi ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo validate polysomnographic markers (sleep latency and sleep-onset REM periods [SOREMPs] at the Multiple Sleep Latency Test [MSLT] and nocturnal polysomnography [PSG]) for pediatric narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) against CSF hypocretin-1 (hcrt-1) deficiency and presence of cataplexy, as no criteria are currently validated in children.MethodsClinical, neurophysiologic, and, when available, biological data (HLA-DQB1*06:02 positivity, CSF hcrt-1 levels) of 357 consecutive children below 18 years of age evaluated for suspected narcolepsy were collected. Best MSLT cutoffs were obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis by contrasting among patients with available CSF hcrt-1 assay (n = 228) with vs without CSF hcrt-1 deficiency, and further validated in patients without available CSF hcrt-1 against cataplexy (n = 129).ResultsPatients with CSF hcrt-1 deficiency were best recognized using a mean MSLT sleep latency ≤8.2 minutes (area under the ROC curve of 0.985), or by at least 2 SOREMPs at the MSLT (area under the ROC curve of 0.975), or the combined PSG + MSLT (area under the ROC curve of 0.977). Although specificity and sensitivity of reference MSLT sleep latency ≤8 minutes and ≥2 SOREMPs (nocturnal SOREMP included) was 100% and 94.87%, the combination of MSLT sleep latency and SOREMP counts did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Age or sex also did not significantly influence these results in our pediatric population.ConclusionsAt least 2 SOREMPs or a mean sleep latency ≤8.2 minutes at the MSLT are valid and reliable markers for pediatric NT1 diagnosis, a result contrasting with adult NT1 criteria.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that for children with suspected narcolepsy, polysomnographic and MSLT markers accurately identify those with narcolepsy type 1.


SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A281-A281
Author(s):  
B Kolla ◽  
M Jahani Kondori ◽  
M Silber ◽  
H Samman ◽  
S Dhankikar ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients presenting with excessive sleepiness are frequently on antidepressant medication(s). While practice parameters recommend discontinuation of antidepressants prior to multiple sleep latency testing (MSLT), data examining the impact of tapering these medications on MSLT results are limited. Methods Adult patients who underwent MSLT at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, between 2014-2018 were included. Clinical and demographic characteristics, medications, including use of rapid eye movement suppressing antidepressants (REMS-AD) at assessment and during testing, actigraphy and polysomnography data were manually abstracted. The difference in number of sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods (SOREMS), proportion with ≥2 SOREMS and mean sleep latency (MSL) in patients who were on REMS-AD and discontinued prior to testing versus those who remained on REMS-AD were examined. At our center, all antidepressants are discontinued 2 weeks prior to MSLT wherever feasible; fluoxetine is stopped 4 weeks prior. Regression analyses accounting for demographic, clinical and other medication-related confounders were performed. Results A total of 502 patients (age=38.18±15.90 years; 67% female) underwent MSLT; 178 (35%) were on REMS-AD at the time of assessment. REMS-AD were discontinued prior to testing in 121/178 (70%) patients. Patients tapered off REMS-AD were more likely to have ≥2 SOREMS (OR-12.20; 95%CI=1.60-92.94) compared to patients who remained on REMS-AD at the time of the MSLT. They also had shorter MSL (8.77±0.46 vs 10.21±0.28; p&gt;0.009) and higher odds of having ≥2 SOREMS (OR=2.22; 95%CI=1.23-3.98) compared to patients not on REMS-AD at initial assessment. These differences persisted after regression analyses accounting for confounders. Conclusion Patients who taper off REMS-AD prior to MSLT are more likely to demonstrate ≥2SOREMs and have a shorter MSL. Pending further prospective investigations, clinicians should preferably withdraw REMs-AD before an MSLT. If this is not done, the test interpretation should include a statement regarding the potential effect of the drugs on the results. Support None


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-21
Author(s):  
Marek Jarema ◽  
Adam Wichniak

Insomnia is an important medical problem; its treatment requires both nonpharmacological methods (education and psychotherapy) and the use of hypnotic agents. The benzodiazepine derivatives may be used as hypnotic agents but their use is substantially limited. The alter­native treatment includes so-called z-drugs, which means nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic agents. Their mechanism of pharmacological action is a GABA-receptor agonism. In general, these drugs improve the quality of sleep (sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, number and duration of awakenings, total sleep time). Contrary to the benzo­diazepines they do not possess anti-anxiety, myorelaxant, and anti-seizure properties, and are better tolerated. Eszopiclone for the treatment of insomnia was not available in Poland. It is not only effective in the treatment of insomnia in comparison to placebo but is also well tolerated. It may be used for a longer time than the benzodiazepines – not only a couple of weeks but per several months. Eszopiclone shortens the sleep latency, decreases the number of wakes after sleep onset and increases total sleep time. It improves the subjective evaluation of sleep by the patients, the quality of sleep and functioning during the day. Its efficacy in the treatment of insomnia in the elderly has also been proved. It is quite well-tolerated and the most frequent side-effect of eszopiclone in the unpleasant taste.


1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-297
Author(s):  
Yasushi Yoshida ◽  
Kenji Kuroda ◽  
Masaharu Mandai ◽  
Seiji Satani ◽  
Narutsugu Emura ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A73-A73
Author(s):  
D Wilson ◽  
C Whenn ◽  
S Walker ◽  
M Barnes ◽  
M Howard

Abstract Self-reported supine position at sleep onset during late pregnancy is related to a 2.6x increase in stillbirth risk, possibly due to the enlarged uterus compressing major blood vessels supplying the placenta. This study aimed to test the effectiveness of a pillow designed to decrease supine sleep in pregnant women. Twelve women in the third trimester of pregnancy used their own pillows for a control week and the intervention pillow for 1 week, in randomised order. Sleep position for each night of both weeks was monitored with the Night Shift Sleep Positioner, with a sleep study (WatchPat300) on the last night of each week to measure the impact of the intervention on SDB. During the control week, the women slept supine for a median of 19.9% (IQR = 11.6, 27.4) of total sleep time (TST), compared to a median of 20.4% (10.2, 31.0) TST using the intervention pillow (p = .64). Use of the intervention pillow did not impact sleep efficiency (control = 85.3% (80.7, 88.0) v. intervention = 85.2% (78.3, 89.0), p = .48). On the sleep study night, supine sleep was reduced in the intervention compared to control condition (12.9% vs. 17.7%, p = .04), but AHI did not differ (intervention = 2.6/hr (0.8, 6.7) vs. control = 1.5/hr (0.6, 3.6), p = .11). We found that the adoption of a pillow designed to discourage supine sleep was not effective in late pregnancy. Considering the reasonably high amount of supine sleep in our participants, alternative devices should be investigated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document