scholarly journals Acute Blockade of PDGF Receptors Decreases Arterial Blood Pressure and Renal Vascular Resistance in Cyp1a1‐Ren2 Transgenic Rats with Angiotensin II‐Dependent Malignant Hypertension

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nora Haney ◽  
Kenneth Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Renal Vascular Resistance ◽  
Malignant Hypertension ◽  
Transgenic Rats ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Renal Vascular

Renal vascular effects of epinephrine infusion in the halothane-anesthetized piglet

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith J. Harrington ◽  
Robert G. Allen ◽  
Jay W. Dewald
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Renal Blood Flow ◽  
Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Mean Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Renal Vascular Resistance ◽  
Epinephrine Infusion ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Renal Vascular

The objective of this study was to determine the dose–response effects of epinephrine, given by systemic intravenous infusion to the halothane-anesthetized newborn piglet, on renal blood flow, mean arterial blood pressure, and renal vascular resistance. Seven newborn piglets were acutely instrumented. A transit-time ultrasound flow probe was placed around the renal artery and a femoral arterial catheter was placed for blood pressure monitoring. Epinephrine was infused in doubling doses from 0.2 to 3.2 μg∙kg−1∙min−1. Mean arterial blood pressure increased from 54 mmHg (1 mmHg = 133.3 Pa) to an average of 96 mmHg at 3.2 μg∙kg−1∙min−1 of epinephrine. Renal blood flow increased from 165 mL∙min−1∙100 g−1 at baseline to 185 mL∙min−1∙100 g−1 at a dose of 0.2 μg∙kg−1∙min−1 and increased further at 0.4 and 0.8 μg∙kg−1∙min−1 to reach 261 mL∙min−1∙100 g−1. Renal blood flow began to fall at a dose of 3.2 μg∙kg−1∙min−1, remaining however, significantly above baseline (211 mL∙min−1∙100 g−1). Consequently, calculated renal vascular resistance fell as the dose was increased from 0.2 to 0.8 μg∙kg−1∙min−1 and then rose again at 1.6 and 3.2 μg∙kg−1∙min−1, being significantly above baseline at 3.2 μg∙kg−1∙min−1. These results demonstrate that epinephrine when given by systemic infusion to the halothane-anesthetized newborn pig is a renal vasodilator at low doses and causes renal vasoconstriction at moderate to high doses. Renal blood flow remained above baseline at all doses tested, and thus, within the dosage range tested, epinephrine infusion should not cause renal ischemia.Key words: epinephrine, kidney blood flow, piglet, renal vascular resistance.

Limb tourniquet and intramuscular clostridial toxin effects on renal function

1962 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Nickel ◽  
John A. Gagnon ◽  
Leonard Levine
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Sodium Excretion ◽  
Renal Vascular Resistance ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Hind Limbs ◽  
Renal Changes ◽  
Anesthetized Dogs ◽  
Peripheral Trauma ◽  
Renal Vascular

Eight anesthetized dogs, given Clostridium perfringens type A toxic filtrate into the hind-limb muscles, showed severe spreading edema, hemoconcentration, marked reduction in para-aminohippurate (PAH) and creatinine clearances, and a rise in the renal vascular resistance. In the first 4 hr sodium excretion fell sharply, and mean arterial blood pressure, slightly. In eight similar dogs venous-occlusive pneumatic tourniquets were applied high on both hind limbs for 90 min. Edema was localized and minimal. Hematocrit was unchanged. PAH and creatinine clearances were extremely low in the second 30-min period of the occlusion but had risen somewhat in the last 30-min period. Sodium excretion was greatly reduced. Arterial pressure and vascular resistance rose very significantly. Upon removal of the tourniquets, PAH and creatinine clearances, blood pressure, and renal vascular resistance returned toward normal. Sodium excretion continued to fall. In many respects the renal changes resulting from two different forms of peripheral trauma are similar. Submitted on August 14, 1959

Renal vasodilatation after inhibition of renin or converting enzyme in marmoset

1986 ◽  
Vol 251 (5) ◽  
pp. H897-H902
Author(s):  
D. Neisius ◽  
J. M. Wood ◽  
K. G. Hofbauer
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Renal Blood Flow ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Renal Vascular Resistance ◽  
Converting Enzyme ◽  
Renin Inhibition ◽  
Renal Vascular

The relative importance of angiotensin II for the renal vasodilatory response after converting-enzyme inhibition was evaluated by a comparison of the effects of converting-enzyme and renin inhibition on renal vascular resistance. Renal, mesenteric, and hindquarter blood flows were measured with chronically implanted ultrasonic-pulsed Doppler flow probes in conscious, mildly volume-depleted marmosets after administration of a converting-enzyme inhibitor (enalaprilat, 2 mg/kg iv), a synthetic renin inhibitor (CGP 29,287, 1 mg/kg iv), or a renin-inhibitory monoclonal antibody (R-3-36-16, 0.1 mg/kg iv). Enalaprilat reduced blood pressure (-16 +/- 4 mmHg, n = 6) and induced a selective increase in renal blood flow (27 +/- 8%, n = 6). CGP 29,287 and R-3-36-16 induced comparable reductions in blood pressure (-16 +/- 4 mmHg, n = 6 and -20 +/- 4 mmHg, n = 5, respectively) and selective increases in renal blood flow (36 +/- 12%, n = 6 and 34 +/- 16%, n = 4, respectively). The decrease in renal vascular resistance was of similar magnitude for all of the inhibitors (enalaprilat -28 +/- 3%, CGP 29,287 -32 +/- 6%; and R-3-36-16 -33 +/- 7%). These results indicate that the renal vasodilatation induced after converting-enzyme or renin inhibition is mainly due to decreased formation of angiotensin II.

scholarly journals Angiotensin II blockade causes acute renal failure in eNOS-deficient mice

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S199-S203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Schnermann ◽  
Yuning G Huang ◽  
Josie P Briggs
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Knockout Mice ◽  
Renal Vascular Resistance ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Arteriolar Tone ◽  
Renal Vascular ◽  
Deficient Mice

Compared with wild-type mice, adult endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) knockout mice (eight months of age) have increased blood pressure (BP) (126±9 mmHg vs. 100±4 mmHg), and an increased renal vascular resistance (155±16 vs. 65±4 mmHg.min/ml). Renal vascular resistance responses to i.v. administration of noradrenaline were markedly enhanced in eNOS knockout mice. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of anaesthetised eNOS -/- mice was 324±57 µl/min gKW, significantly lower than the GFR of 761±126 µl/min.gKW in wild-type mice. AT1-receptor blockade with i.v. candesartan (1—1.5 mg/kg) reduced arterial blood pressure and renal vascular resistance, and increased renal blood flow (RBF) to about the same extent in wild-type and eNOS -/- mice. Candesartan did not alter GFR in wild-type mice (761±126 vs. 720±95 µl/min.gKW), but caused a marked decrease in GFR in eNOS -/- mice (324.5±75.2 vs. 77±18 µl/min.gKW). A similar reduction in GFR of eNOS deficient mice was also caused by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. Afferent arteriolar granularity, a measure of renal renin expression, was found to be reduced in eNOS -/- compared with wild-type mice. In chronically eNOS-deficient mice, angiotensin II (Ang II) is critical for maintaining glomerular filtration pressure and GFR, presumably through its effect on efferent arteriolar tone.

Absence of Adrenergic Mediation of Agonist Response to [Sar1,Ala8]Angiotensin II in Conscious Normotensive and Hypertensive Dogs

1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. G. Zimmerman
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Intravenous Infusion ◽  
Direct Action ◽  
Renal Vascular Resistance ◽  
Angiotensin Receptors ◽  
Conscious Dog ◽  
Renal Vascular

1. In the conscious normotensive and two-kidney Goldblatt hypertensive dog a transient agonist response to the intravenous infusion of saralasin (1 μg min−1 kg−1) was manifested by a small increase in blood pressure (6–12 mmHg) and 28–30% increase in renal vascular resistance. 2. These increases in blood pressure and renal vascular resistance were unaffected by administration of either phentolamine or guanethidine. 3. The agonist response in the conscious dog is most likely accounted for by a direct action of saralasin on vascular angiotensin receptors.

Renal Vascular Responses to Dopamine: Haemodynamic and Angiographic Observations in Normal Man

1973 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. K. Hollenberg ◽  
D. F. Adams ◽  
P. Mendell ◽  
H. L. Abrams ◽  
J. P. Merrill
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Cardiovascular Effects ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Vascular Effects ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Normal Man ◽  
Renal Vascular

1. The renal vascular response to intravenously administered dopamine was assessed in normal man by selective renal arteriography and xenon washout. Infusion of 3 μg min−1 kg−1 induced renal vasodilatation with an increase in the cortical component of blood flow. Arterial blood pressure was not influenced and a systemic effect was not demonstrable. Lower doses did not induce a renal response. Increasing dosage raised arterial blood pressure and induced subjective symptoms, but did not result in a further increase in renal blood flow. 2. Renal vascular resistance increased with increasing age in the normal subjects. A significant inverse relationship was found between the initial vascular resistance and the renal vasodilator response to dopamine. It thus appears that the vascular effects of increasing age (nephrosclerosis) may limit the dilator response to dopamine. 3. It is concluded that dopamine is an effective renal cortical vasodilator when administered intravenously at doses which are free from other systemic cardiovascular effects. The dose-response relationship must be considered in attempts at reversal of conditions characterized by renal vasoconstriction.

Impaired Autoregulatory Responses in Contralateral Kidneys of Two-Kidney, One-Clip Hypertensive Rats

1980 ◽  
Vol 59 (s6) ◽  
pp. 381s-384s ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Ploth ◽  
R. N. Roy ◽  
Wann-Chu Huang ◽  
L. G. Navar
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Renal Blood Flow ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Urine Flow ◽  
Renal Vascular Resistance ◽  
Hypertensive Rats ◽  
Contralateral Kidney ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Renal Vascular

1. Micropuncture and clearance experiments in two-kidney, one-clip renal vascular hypertensive rats examined the ability of the kidney contralateral to renal vascular stenosis to maintain renal function during conditions of reduced renal arterial blood pressure. 2. At their respective spontaneous blood pressures, renal vascular resistance was higher and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal blood flow were not different in the contralateral kidneys of the hypertensive rats (170 ± 5 mmHg) compared with normal animals (129 ± 1 mmHg). Urine flow and absolute and fractional excretion of electrolyte were greater from the kidneys of the hypertensive animals. However, pressures in cortical structures were similar in the two groups. 3. As blood pressure was reduced acutely, the kidney contralateral to the renal artery stenosis achieved only small decreases in renal vascular resistance that failed to allow GFR, renal blood flow or pressures in cortical structures to be maintained. In contrast, normal rats efficiently autoregulated renal vascular resistance to allow GFR, renal blood flow and cortical pressures to be unchanged as blood pressure was altered between 130 and 115 mmHg. Urine flow and electrolyte excretion decreased to a greater extent in the hypertensive kidneys; at comparable blood pressure these indices of excretory function were not different in the two groups. 4. These observations indicate that the contralateral kidney can maintain normal haemodynamic and glomerular function only at elevated blood pressure and suggest the possibility that the impaired capacity to autoregulate renal resistances may contribute to the maintenance of hypertension observed in this model.

Frequency modulation of mesenteric and renal vascular resistance

2002 ◽  
Vol 282 (5) ◽  
pp. R1468-R1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaf Grisk ◽  
Harald M. Stauss
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Frequency Modulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Renal Vascular Resistance ◽  
Pressure Oscillations ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Sympathetic Modulation ◽  
Vascular Beds ◽  
Renal Vascular

The hypothesis was tested that low-frequency vasomotions in individual vascular beds are integrated by the cardiovascular system, such that new fluctuations at additional frequencies occur in arterial blood pressure. In anesthetized rats ( n = 8), the sympathetic splanchnic and renal nerves were simultaneously stimulated at combinations of frequencies ranging from 0.075 to 0.8 Hz. Blood pressure was recorded together with mesenteric and renal blood flow velocities. Dual nerve stimulation at low frequencies (<0.6 Hz) caused corresponding oscillations in vascular resistance and blood pressure, whereas higher stimulation frequencies increased the mean levels. Blood pressure oscillations were only detected at the individual stimulation frequencies and their harmonics. The strongest periodic responses in vascular resistance were found at 0.40 ± 0.02 Hz in the mesenteric and at 0.32 ± 0.03 Hz ( P < 0.05) in the renal vascular bed. Thus frequency modulation of low-frequency vasomotions in individual vascular beds does not cause significant blood pressure oscillations at additional frequencies. Furthermore, our data suggest that sympathetic modulation of mesenteric vascular resistance can initiate blood pressure oscillations at slightly higher frequencies than sympathetic modulation of renal vascular resistance.

Forearm and finger blood flow responses to passive body tilts

1979 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. A. Mengesha ◽  
G. H. Bell
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Arterial Blood Pressure ◽  
Vascular Resistance ◽  
Pulse Rate ◽  
Forearm Blood Flow ◽  
Body Tilt ◽  
Finger Blood Flow ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Forearm Vascular Resistance

Ten to fifteen healthy subjects, ages 18--30 yr, were used to assess the correlation of forearm blood flow with graded passive body tilts and vascular resistance and also to discern the relative effects of body tilts on finger blood flow. In the head-up tilts forearm blood flow and arterial blood pressure fell progressively, whereas forearm vascular resistance and pulse rate increased. In the head-down tilts the forearm blood flow and the arterial blood pressure increased, whereas the forearm vascular resistance and pulse rate decreased. These changes were found to be significantly correlated with the different tilt angles and with one another. In a preliminary study it was found that infrared heating of the carpometacarpal region produced finger vasodilatation similar to the forearm vasodilatation observed by Crockford and Hellon (6). However, unlike forearm blood flow, finger blood flow showed no appreciable response to either the head-up or head-down tilts. This indicates that the sympathetic tone and the volume of blood in the finger are not appreciably altered by this test procedure at least 1 min after the body tilt is assumed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document