Phenylephrine Added to Prophylactic Ephedrine Infusion during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 668-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric J. Mercier ◽  
Edward T. Riley ◽  
Willard L. Frederickson ◽  
Sandrine Roger-Christoph ◽  
Dan Benhamou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
American Society ◽  
Spinal Hypotension

Background Because ephedrine infusion (2 mg/min) does not adequately prevent spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, the authors investigated whether adding phenylephrine would improve its efficacy. Methods Thirty-nine parturients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for cesarean delivery received a crystalloid preload of 15 ml/kg. Spinal anesthesia was performed using 11 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, 2.5 microg sufentanil, and 0.1 mg morphine. Maternal heart rate and systolic blood pressure were measured at frequent intervals. A vasopressor infusion was started immediately after spinal injection of either 2 mg/min ephedrine plus 10 microg/min phenylephrine or 2 mg/min ephedrine alone. Treatments were assigned randomly in a double-blind fashion. The infusion rate was adjusted according to systolic blood pressure using a predefined algorithm. Hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg and less than 80% of baseline, was treated with 6 mg ephedrine bolus doses. Results Hypotension occurred less frequently in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group than in the ephedrine-alone group: 37% versus 75% (P = 0.02). Ephedrine (36+/-16 mg, mean +/- SD) plus 178+/-81 microg phenylephrine was infused in former group, whereas 54+/-18 mg ephedrine was infused in the latter. Median supplemental ephedrine requirements and nausea scores (0-3) were less in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group (0 vs. 12 mg, P = 0.02; and 0 vs. 1.5, P = 0.01, respectively). Umbilical artery pH values were significantly higher in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group than in the group that received ephedrine alone (7.24 vs. 7.19). Apgar scores were similarly good in both groups. Conclusion Phenylephrine added to an infusion of ephedrine halved the incidence of hypotension and increased umbilical cord pH.

Prophylactic Angiotensin II Infusion during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery 

1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 1475-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Vincent ◽  
Carol F. Werhan ◽  
Patricia F. Norman ◽  
Grace H. Shih ◽  
David H. Chestnut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Elective Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Maternal Heart Rate ◽  
Elective Cesarean

Background Angiotensin II may prove useful in treating regional anesthesia-induced hypotension in obstetric patients, because it causes less uterine vasoconstriction than do other vasoconstrictor drugs (such as phenylephrine). This study compared (1) maternal blood pressure and heart rate and (2) fetal status at delivery in parturients given either prophylactic angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Methods Fifty-four women were randomized to receive either angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion intravenously during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section delivery. Simultaneous with subarachnoid injection, infusion of angiotensin II (2.5 microg/ml) or ephedrine (5 mg/ml) was initiated at 10 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1) and 50 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), respectively. The rate of each infusion was adjusted to maintain maternal systolic blood pressure at 90-100% of baseline. Results Cumulative vasopressor doses (mean+/-SD) through 10, 20, and 30 min were 150+/-100, 310+/-180, and 500+/-320 ng/kg in the angiotensin group and 480+/-210, 660+/-390, and 790+/-640 microg/kg in the ephedrine group. Maternal heart rate was significantly higher (P < 0.001) during vasopressor infusion in the ephedrine group than in the angiotensin group. Umbilical arterial and venous blood pH and base excess were all significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the angiotensin group than in the ephedrine group. Conclusions Angiotensin II infusion maintained maternal systolic blood pressure during spinal anesthesia without increasing maternal heart rate or causing fetal acidosis.

Norepinephrine as an Alternative in Hypotension Prophylaxis During Cesarean Sectionunder Spinal Anesthesia

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed I Shahin ◽  
Ayman M Kamaly ◽  
Mohamed Saleh ◽  
Ashraf E El-Agamy
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Hypotensive Effect ◽  
Maternal Blood ◽  
Cesarean Sections ◽  
Fluid Loading ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Spinal Hypotension ◽  
Maternal Blood Pressure

Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia is the preferred method for elective cesarean sections (C.S.) due to considerable risks regarding airway management associated with physiological changes of pregnancy. Hypotension is reported to occur in up to 80% of spinal anesthesia cases. Many approaches have been investigated to prevent spinal hypotension, e.g., fluid loading, vasopressors, or both. Thus we compare the administration of intermittent I.V. boluses of norepinephrine and ephedrine to guard against the hypotensive effect of spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Patients and Methods 120 female patients undergoing electiveC.S.were randomly divided into “group-E” for Ephedrine and “group-N” for Norepinephrine. Results Compared with ephedrine, norepinephrine maintained maternal blood pressure and uterine artery blood flow. Further, it was associated with lower numbers of hypotension and hypertension episodes and less frequency of bradycardia and tachycardia during cesarean delivery. Conclusion Norepinephrine can be used as an alternative vasopressor to maintain maternal blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, with no adverse effect on neonatal outcome.

scholarly journals Low Dose Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Fentanyl in Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Section

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-82
Author(s):  
Bharati Devi Sharma Regmi ◽  
Gopendra Prasad Deo ◽  
Subin Shrestha ◽  
Sabita Shrestha ◽  
Renuka Tamrakar Mishra
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Elective Cesarean

Background: Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine provides a dense neural block in cesarean delivery but associated with side effects like hypotension, bradycardia nausea and vomiting. Addition of low dose fentanyl with low dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine may decrease the in­cidence of these complications. The aims of study was to compare the hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure and heart rate), nausea and vomiting with low dose intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl vs a conventional dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine in patient undergoing elective cesarean section. Methods: Seventy-four pregnant women aged 20-35 years old which un­derwent elective cesarean section at Chitwan Medical College were ran­domized into two groups. One group received spinal anesthesia with 8mg of0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 25μg fentanyl and another group re­ceived 12mg 0.5% bupivacaine. Results: The mean age, baseline heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were comparable in both groups. Significant difference in hypo­tension (24.31% vs. 62.16%, p<0.05) and Nausea and vomiting (16.20% vs. 27%, p<0.05) were found in bupivacaine-fentanyl group versus a conven­tional dose of spinal bupivacaine group. Conclusions: Low dose of bupivacaine with Fentanyl provides good spinal anesthesia for cesarean section with less hypotension, nausea and vomit­ing in comparison to bupivacaine alone.

Intrathecal Sufentanil for Labor Analgesia Does Not Cause a Sympathectomy 

1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 874-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward T. Riley ◽  
Dean Walker ◽  
Catherine L. Hamilton ◽  
Sheila E. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Labor Analgesia ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Central Temperature ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Background Intrathecal sufentanil (ITS) is frequently used to provide analgesia during labor. Decreases in blood pressure and sensory changes in this circumstance suggest that ITS may have a local anesthetic effect and thus cause a sympathectomy. To determine whether ITS given to laboring women causes a sympathectomy, the authors evaluated central and lower extremity temperature changes after ITS administration. These findings were compared with those in a control group of women having spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine for elective cesarean section in whom an extensive sympathectomy was expected. Methods Twenty parturients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status 1 or 2 had temperatures measured centrally, at the calf, and at the great toe at frequent intervals after receiving 10 microg ITS for labor analgesia (sufentanil group, n = 10), or hyperbaric bupivacaine 12 mg in their spinal anesthetic for cesarean section (bupivacaine group, n = 10). Calf-to-toe temperature indices (C-T) were calculated by subtracting toe temperature from calf temperature. A decrease in this index means that the toe had warmed compared with the calf and is an indication of vasodilation and a sympathectomy. Results There was no significant change in the C-T indices or central temperature in the sufentanil group, but the C-T indices and central temperature decreased significantly in the bupivacaine group. Conclusions The decreases in the C-T index and central temperature in the bupivacaine group indicate the presence of a sympathectomy. The lack of change in the C-T indices and central temperature in the sufentanil group indicates that no significant vasodilation occurred. Therefore, the decrease in blood pressure seen after ITS administration for labor analgesia is unlikely to be the result of a sympathectomy.

scholarly journals Norepinephrine versus ephedrine for hypotension prophylaxis during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashraf E. Elagamy ◽  
Aiman M. Kamaly ◽  
Mohamed I. Shahin ◽  
Mohamed Saleh
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Hypotensive Effect ◽  
Maternal Blood ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Spinal Hypotension ◽  
Maternal Blood Pressure

Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia is the preferred anesthetic method for elective cesarean sections (C.S.) due to considerable risks regarding airway management associated with physiological changes of pregnancy. Hypotension is reported to occur in up to 80% of spinal anesthesia cases. Many approaches have been tried to prevent spinal hypotension, e.g., fluid loading, vasopressors, or both. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double blind study is to compare the administration of intermittent i.v. boluses of norepinephrine and ephedrine to guard against the hypotensive effect of spinal anesthesia during cesarean delivery. Methods In the present study, 120 pregnant female undergoing elective CS were randomly divided into “group E” for ephedrine and “group N” for norepinephrine, 60 female in each group. Standard spinal anesthetic technique using 25 spinal needle under complete aseptic technique with injection of 1.8–2.2 ml of heavy bupivacaine 0.5% plus 25 μg of fentanyl according to female height. Group E will receive 10 mg of i.v. diluted ephedrine as hypotension prophylaxis, and group N will receive 16 μg as hypotension prophylaxis at the time of intrathecal block. Measurements of intraoperative episodes of hypotension and their treatment with the same dose of the studied drug in each group, incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting, and APGAR score of baby at 1 and 5 min will be recorded. Results Compared with ephedrine, norepinephrine maintained maternal blood pressure. Further, it was associated with lower numbers of hypotension episodes, but more frequency of bradycardia during cesarean delivery. Conclusion Norepinephrine can be used as an alternative vasopressor to maintain maternal blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, with no adverse effect on neonatal outcome.

scholarly journals The effect of clonidine with bupivacaine on perioperative hemodynamics and post-operative analgesia in cesarean section cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 3049
Author(s):  
Priti Kumar ◽  
Sangeeta Arya ◽  
Sushil Kr. Singh ◽  
Sunil Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intraoperative Hypotension ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Cesarean section is the commonest procedure in Obstetric practice and postoperative pain can be a major factor for wound healing as well as mother and baby bonding. Spinal anesthesia is considered to be safest and easiest modality for cesarean section cases. Bupivacaine is the commonest drug given in spinal anesthesia, but many additive drugs have been introduced to cover post-operative analgesia. Clonidine is an alpha 2 agonist which can be used as an adjunct to heavy bupivacaine to extend analgesic effects.Methods: A randomized double-blind study was performed in 100 women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. After proper informed written consent patient undergoing cesarean section were divided by computerized method into group A (Given 10.0 mg 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine) and Group B (Given 9.0 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 30 μg clonidine).Results: Intraoperative hypotension is the most worrisome factor but it is transient and can be managed by ephedrine effectively. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting are slightly higher with clonidine as occurrence of hypotension is more. VAS scoring in post-operative period was better and need of first analgesic dose was much delayed in women been given clonidine with bupivacaine.Conclusions: Clonidine can be considered as adjunct in spinal anesthesia to extend post-op analgesic cover. 

scholarly journals Intravenous Ketamine for the Prevention of Post Anesthetic Shivering in Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzad Sarshivi ◽  
Ebrahim Ghaderi ◽  
Arman Sarshivi ◽  
Shoaleh Shami ◽  
Karim Nasseri
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Intravenous Ketamine

Spinal anesthesia (SA) may impair thermoregulatory control, which may result in shivering, which is a potentially harassing complication. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the prophylactic effects of intravenous ketamine on the prevention of shivering in patients who underwent elective cesarean section (CSs) under SA. In this double-blind, randomized placebo controlled trial, a total of 90 parturients under SA using hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg were allocated in two groups to receive ketamine 0.3 mg/kg or 0.9% saline following delivery. After induction of SA, patients were observed for the incidence and intensity of shivering using a four-point scale. Shivering was observed in 24 patients (53.3%) in the saline group and 15 patients (33.3%) in the ketamine group. Median (quartiles 1 and 3) of the intensity of shivering was 1 (0-2) and 0 (0-2) in saline and ketamine groups, respectively. Time from spinal anesthesia to the beginning of shivering was 33.1±11.7 min in saline versus 41.6±20.7 min in the ketamine group. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia was not different between the groups. A significantly higher incidence of nystagmus and sedation was observed in the ketamine group when compared with the saline group administration of low dose i.v. Ketamine (0.3 mg/kg) was effective in lowering shivering intensity during CSS under spinal anesthesia, though side effects such as nystagmus and sedation may restrict its effectiveness.

scholarly journals The transverse diameter of right common femoral vein by ultrasound in the supine position for predicting post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-Fa Yao ◽  
Yan-Hong Zhao ◽  
Jing Zheng ◽  
Jie-Yan Qian ◽  
Chen Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Femoral Vein ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Gravid Uterus ◽  
Transverse Diameter ◽  
Common Femoral Vein ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Spinal Hypotension ◽  
Receiver Operating

Abstract Background Post-spinal anesthesia hypotension during cesarean delivery is caused by decreased systemic vascular resistance due to the blockage of the autonomic nerves, which is further worsened by inferior vena cava (IVC) compression by the gravid uterus. This study aimed to assess whether peak velocity and diameter of the IVC below the xiphoid or right common femoral vein (RCFV) in the inguinal region, as measured on ultrasound, could reflect the degree of IVC compression and further identify parturients at risk of post-spinal hypotension. Methods Fifty-six parturients who underwent elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia were included in this study; peak velocities and anteroposterior diameters of the IVC and peak velocities and transverse diameters of the RCFV were measured using ultrasound before anesthesia. The primary outcome was the ultrasound measurements of IVC and RCFV acquired before spinal anesthesia and their association with post-spinal hypotension. Hypotension was defined as a drop in systolic arterial pressure by > 20% from the baseline. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify the association between the measurements of IVC, RCFV, and post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to test the abilities of the identified parameters to predict post-spinal hypotension; the areas under the curve and optimum cut-off values for the predictive parameters were calculated. Results A longer transverse diameter of the RCFV was associated with the occurrence of post-spinal hypotension (odds ratio = 2.022, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.261–3.243). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the prediction of post-spinal hypotension was 0.759 (95% CI 0.628–0.890, P = 0.001). A transverse diameter of > 12.2 mm of the RCFV could predict post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Conclusions A longer transverse diameter of RCFV was associated with hypotension and could predict parturients at a major risk of hypotension before anesthesia. Trial registration This study was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn on 16, May, 2018. No. ChiCTR1800016163.

Effectiveness of Intrathecal Administration of Bupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Nalbuphine for Elective Cesarean Section

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Mohamed Bahaa Eldin Mostafa Abdel Rahman ◽  
Khaled Mohammed Maghawry ◽  
Raham Hasan Mostafa ◽  
Ahmed Wagih Ezzat
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia is the most popular procedure in the field of anesthesiology. Subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthetic technique for cesarean section, being simple to perform and economical with rapid onset. Lower incidence of failed block, less drug doses, minimal neonatal depression and decreased incidence of aspiration pneumonitis are added advantages of spinal anesthesia. Objectives The study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of Fentanyl versus Nalbuphine when used with intrathecal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section as the primary objective and compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative pruritus and shivering as the secondary objectives. Methods and material After Approval was obtained from the research ethics committee of faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University and after obtaining a written informed consent. Fifty adult females underwent elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia, their ages ranged between 18-45 years old and classified as ASA I and II were enrolled in the study at obstetrics and gynecology Ain Shams university hospital over 4 months. The patients were randomly divided using computer generated randomization into two groups 25patients in each (n = 25), Group A received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml fentanyl (25 μg); Group B received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg) Results The main significant findings in this study was that fentanyl has a more rapid onset of motor block (5.63±0.25 minute in fentanyl group versus 5.88±0.19 minute in nalbuphine group), while nalbuphine produces less perioperative side effects as: shivering (7 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group), pruritis (6 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group), nausea and vomiting (5 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group). Regarding perioperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative analgesia, they were comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusions We concluded that either intrathecal nalbuphine (0.8 mg) combined with (10 mg) Bupivacaine or intrathecal fentanyl (25 µg) combined with (10 mg) Bupivacaine improves intraoperative analgesia and prolongs early postoperative analgesia in cesarean section with significantly lower incidence of side effects as shivering, pruritis, nausea and vomiting in Nalbuphine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document