scholarly journals Intravenous Ketamine for the Prevention of Post Anesthetic Shivering in Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzad Sarshivi ◽  
Ebrahim Ghaderi ◽  
Arman Sarshivi ◽  
Shoaleh Shami ◽  
Karim Nasseri
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Intravenous Ketamine

Spinal anesthesia (SA) may impair thermoregulatory control, which may result in shivering, which is a potentially harassing complication. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the prophylactic effects of intravenous ketamine on the prevention of shivering in patients who underwent elective cesarean section (CSs) under SA. In this double-blind, randomized placebo controlled trial, a total of 90 parturients under SA using hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg were allocated in two groups to receive ketamine 0.3 mg/kg or 0.9% saline following delivery. After induction of SA, patients were observed for the incidence and intensity of shivering using a four-point scale. Shivering was observed in 24 patients (53.3%) in the saline group and 15 patients (33.3%) in the ketamine group. Median (quartiles 1 and 3) of the intensity of shivering was 1 (0-2) and 0 (0-2) in saline and ketamine groups, respectively. Time from spinal anesthesia to the beginning of shivering was 33.1±11.7 min in saline versus 41.6±20.7 min in the ketamine group. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia was not different between the groups. A significantly higher incidence of nystagmus and sedation was observed in the ketamine group when compared with the saline group administration of low dose i.v. Ketamine (0.3 mg/kg) was effective in lowering shivering intensity during CSS under spinal anesthesia, though side effects such as nystagmus and sedation may restrict its effectiveness.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Phenylephrine in Preventing Hemodynamic Responses of Oxytocin during Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (01) ◽  
pp. 048-053
Author(s):  
Medha Mohta ◽  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
Rachna Agarwal ◽  
Geetanjali T. Chilkoti ◽  
Sakshi Duggal
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hemodynamic Changes ◽  
Singleton Pregnancy ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Better Than

AbstractThis study compared hemodynamic changes and occurrence of complications following oxytocin administration with a prior injection of phenylephrine 100 μg or normal saline during elective cesarean section. Sixty-six healthy term parturients with uncomplicated, singleton pregnancy undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were studied. They received either intravenous phenylephrine 100 μg or normal saline before oxytocin 3 IU was administered over 30 seconds. Oxytocin dose was repeated depending on the adequacy of uterine tone. There was no significant change in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures during the initial 3 minutes following oxytocin administration in the phenylephrine group but a significant fall in mean and diastolic pressures in the saline group. Heart rate did not change significantly, and no significant complications occurred in either of the groups. To conclude, phenylephrine 100 μg administered before oxytocin injection maintained hemodynamic parameters better than normal saline injection during elective cesarean section.

scholarly journals Low Dose Hyperbaric Bupivacaine with Fentanyl in Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Section

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-82
Author(s):  
Bharati Devi Sharma Regmi ◽  
Gopendra Prasad Deo ◽  
Subin Shrestha ◽  
Sabita Shrestha ◽  
Renuka Tamrakar Mishra
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Elective Cesarean

Background: Spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine provides a dense neural block in cesarean delivery but associated with side effects like hypotension, bradycardia nausea and vomiting. Addition of low dose fentanyl with low dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine may decrease the in­cidence of these complications. The aims of study was to compare the hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure and heart rate), nausea and vomiting with low dose intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl vs a conventional dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine in patient undergoing elective cesarean section. Methods: Seventy-four pregnant women aged 20-35 years old which un­derwent elective cesarean section at Chitwan Medical College were ran­domized into two groups. One group received spinal anesthesia with 8mg of0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 25μg fentanyl and another group re­ceived 12mg 0.5% bupivacaine. Results: The mean age, baseline heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were comparable in both groups. Significant difference in hypo­tension (24.31% vs. 62.16%, p<0.05) and Nausea and vomiting (16.20% vs. 27%, p<0.05) were found in bupivacaine-fentanyl group versus a conven­tional dose of spinal bupivacaine group. Conclusions: Low dose of bupivacaine with Fentanyl provides good spinal anesthesia for cesarean section with less hypotension, nausea and vomit­ing in comparison to bupivacaine alone.

Phenylephrine Added to Prophylactic Ephedrine Infusion during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Section

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 668-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric J. Mercier ◽  
Edward T. Riley ◽  
Willard L. Frederickson ◽  
Sandrine Roger-Christoph ◽  
Dan Benhamou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
American Society ◽  
Spinal Hypotension

Background Because ephedrine infusion (2 mg/min) does not adequately prevent spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery, the authors investigated whether adding phenylephrine would improve its efficacy. Methods Thirty-nine parturients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who were scheduled for cesarean delivery received a crystalloid preload of 15 ml/kg. Spinal anesthesia was performed using 11 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, 2.5 microg sufentanil, and 0.1 mg morphine. Maternal heart rate and systolic blood pressure were measured at frequent intervals. A vasopressor infusion was started immediately after spinal injection of either 2 mg/min ephedrine plus 10 microg/min phenylephrine or 2 mg/min ephedrine alone. Treatments were assigned randomly in a double-blind fashion. The infusion rate was adjusted according to systolic blood pressure using a predefined algorithm. Hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure less than 100 mmHg and less than 80% of baseline, was treated with 6 mg ephedrine bolus doses. Results Hypotension occurred less frequently in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group than in the ephedrine-alone group: 37% versus 75% (P = 0.02). Ephedrine (36+/-16 mg, mean +/- SD) plus 178+/-81 microg phenylephrine was infused in former group, whereas 54+/-18 mg ephedrine was infused in the latter. Median supplemental ephedrine requirements and nausea scores (0-3) were less in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group (0 vs. 12 mg, P = 0.02; and 0 vs. 1.5, P = 0.01, respectively). Umbilical artery pH values were significantly higher in the ephedrine-phenylephrine group than in the group that received ephedrine alone (7.24 vs. 7.19). Apgar scores were similarly good in both groups. Conclusion Phenylephrine added to an infusion of ephedrine halved the incidence of hypotension and increased umbilical cord pH.

Safety and effectiveness of coadministration of intrathecal sufentanil and morphine in hyperbaric bupivacaine-based spinal anesthesia for cesarean section

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaetano Draisci, MD ◽  
Luciano Frassanito, MD ◽  
Raffaella Pinto, MD ◽  
Bruno Zanfini, MD ◽  
Gabriella Ferrandina, MD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Intrathecal Morphine ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Single Administration ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Group

Subarachnoid block is a widely used technique for cesarean section. Opioids adding to the local anesthetics can improve its quality. In this prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial, we compared the effects of coadministration of intrathecal sufentanil and morphine with intrathecal sufentanil and a single administration of subcutaneous morphine. Sixty-four pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were assigned to two groups according to the way of administration of morphine: intrathecal sufentanil (5 μg) plus intrathecal morphine (150 μg) (ITM group), and intrathecal sufentanil (5 μg) plus single administration of 10 mg subcutaneous morphine (SCM group). In both groups, the local anesthetic used was hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 percent (10 mg). Both groups received 1 g acetaminophen every 6 hours. In the postoperative period, pain was recorded on a 0-100 visual analog scale (VAS) and intravenous tramadol (100 mg) was administered if VAS score was >40 mm. Collateral effects, such us nausea, itching, respiratory depression, and sedation were assessed. VAS scores at rest and on coughing were significantly higher in the SCM group than in the ITM group between 3 and 24 hours. The mean titrated dose of tramadol consumed was also significantly greater in the SCM group than in the ITM group (p < 0.05). The time to first administration of tramadol was lower in the SCM group versus the ITM group (p < 0.05). The incidence of nausea was significantly lower in the SCM group than in the ITM group (p < 0.05). There was no significant group difference in the incidence of pruritus (p > 0.05). In conclusion, coadministration of sufentanil and morphine into the subarachnoid space was effective and provided longer pain relief than intrathecal sufentanil plus a single injection of subcutaneous morphine, despite a higher incidence of side effects such as nausea and vomiting.

scholarly journals The effect of clonidine with bupivacaine on perioperative hemodynamics and post-operative analgesia in cesarean section cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 3049
Author(s):  
Priti Kumar ◽  
Sangeeta Arya ◽  
Sushil Kr. Singh ◽  
Sunil Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intraoperative Hypotension ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Cesarean section is the commonest procedure in Obstetric practice and postoperative pain can be a major factor for wound healing as well as mother and baby bonding. Spinal anesthesia is considered to be safest and easiest modality for cesarean section cases. Bupivacaine is the commonest drug given in spinal anesthesia, but many additive drugs have been introduced to cover post-operative analgesia. Clonidine is an alpha 2 agonist which can be used as an adjunct to heavy bupivacaine to extend analgesic effects.Methods: A randomized double-blind study was performed in 100 women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. After proper informed written consent patient undergoing cesarean section were divided by computerized method into group A (Given 10.0 mg 0.5% hyperbaric Bupivacaine) and Group B (Given 9.0 mg 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine and 30 μg clonidine).Results: Intraoperative hypotension is the most worrisome factor but it is transient and can be managed by ephedrine effectively. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting are slightly higher with clonidine as occurrence of hypotension is more. VAS scoring in post-operative period was better and need of first analgesic dose was much delayed in women been given clonidine with bupivacaine.Conclusions: Clonidine can be considered as adjunct in spinal anesthesia to extend post-op analgesic cover. 

Effectiveness of Intrathecal Administration of Bupivacaine with Fentanyl versus Nalbuphine for Elective Cesarean Section

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nada Mohamed Bahaa Eldin Mostafa Abdel Rahman ◽  
Khaled Mohammed Maghawry ◽  
Raham Hasan Mostafa ◽  
Ahmed Wagih Ezzat
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Elective Cesarean ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Abstract Background Spinal anesthesia is the most popular procedure in the field of anesthesiology. Subarachnoid block is the preferred anesthetic technique for cesarean section, being simple to perform and economical with rapid onset. Lower incidence of failed block, less drug doses, minimal neonatal depression and decreased incidence of aspiration pneumonitis are added advantages of spinal anesthesia. Objectives The study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of Fentanyl versus Nalbuphine when used with intrathecal injection of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean section as the primary objective and compare intraoperative hemodynamic changes and postoperative pruritus and shivering as the secondary objectives. Methods and material After Approval was obtained from the research ethics committee of faculty of medicine, Ain Shams University and after obtaining a written informed consent. Fifty adult females underwent elective cesarean section with spinal anesthesia, their ages ranged between 18-45 years old and classified as ASA I and II were enrolled in the study at obstetrics and gynecology Ain Shams university hospital over 4 months. The patients were randomly divided using computer generated randomization into two groups 25patients in each (n = 25), Group A received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml fentanyl (25 μg); Group B received intrathecal injection of 2 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 0.5 ml nalbuphine (0.8 mg) Results The main significant findings in this study was that fentanyl has a more rapid onset of motor block (5.63±0.25 minute in fentanyl group versus 5.88±0.19 minute in nalbuphine group), while nalbuphine produces less perioperative side effects as: shivering (7 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group), pruritis (6 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group), nausea and vomiting (5 patients in fentanyl group versus 1 patient in nalbuphine group). Regarding perioperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative analgesia, they were comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusions We concluded that either intrathecal nalbuphine (0.8 mg) combined with (10 mg) Bupivacaine or intrathecal fentanyl (25 µg) combined with (10 mg) Bupivacaine improves intraoperative analgesia and prolongs early postoperative analgesia in cesarean section with significantly lower incidence of side effects as shivering, pruritis, nausea and vomiting in Nalbuphine.

scholarly journals A comparison of the effect of dexamethasone and pethidine for prevention of shivering after spinal anesthesia in caesarean section: randomization clinical trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 2646-2650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamideh Gholami ◽  
Yousef Moradi ◽  
Zaher Khazaei ◽  
Shahrzad Tehrani
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Dexamethasone Group ◽  
Postanesthetic Shivering ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Postanesthetic shivering is one of the most common complications and problems after operations. Medications and drugs can be used to prevent postanesthetic shivering. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Dexamethasone and Pethidine in preventing postanesthetic shivering after spinal anesthesia in Iranian women undergoing caesarean section. Method: This double-blind randomized clinical trial was performed in 66 pregnant women who were referred to Ayatollah Moosavi Hospital in Zanjan, Iran for elective cesarean section, from December 2011 to November 2012. All participants who have ASA I-II were randomly classified into three groups: Dexamethasone receivers (Group A), Pethidine receivers (Group B), and Normal Saline receivers (Group C). Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS16 software. IRCT registration number of this study is IRCT201112198469N1. Conclusion: Although statistically there was no significant difference between the three groups of Dexamethasone, Pethidine and Normal Saline receivers regarding shivering reduction; clinical complication rate in Dexamethasone group was lower comparedto Pethidine and Normal Saline groups. Results: There was no significant difference between three groups regarding shivering reduction. There were 11 (72.5%) trembling cases in Normal Saline group, 6 cases (27.3%) in Dexamethasone group, and 12 cases (54.5%) in Pethidine group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document