Capsular Contracture After Cosmetic Breast Implant Surgery in Denmark

2001 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Kj??ller ◽  
Lisbet R. H??lmich ◽  
Poul Harboe Jacobsen ◽  
S??ren Friis ◽  
Jon Fryzek ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Tyler Safran ◽  
Hillary Nepon ◽  
Carrie K. Chu ◽  
Sebastian Winocour ◽  
Amanda Murphy ◽  
...  

AbstractOver 400,000 women in the United States alone will have breast implant surgery each year. Although capsular contracture represents the most common complication of breast implant surgery, surgeons continue to debate the precise etiology. General agreement exists concerning the inflammatory origin of capsular fibrosis, but the inciting events triggering the inflammatory cascade appear to be multifactorial, making it difficult to predict why one patient may develop capsular contracture while another will not. Accordingly, researchers have explored many different surgical, biomaterial, and medical therapies to address these multiple factors in an attempt to prevent and treat capsular contracture. In the current paper, we aim to inform the reader on the most up-to-date understanding of the pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of capsular contracture.


2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. 956-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik de Bakker ◽  
Mathijs Rots ◽  
Marlon E. Buncamper ◽  
Frank B. Niessen ◽  
Jan Maerten Smit ◽  
...  

Breast Care ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Jürgen Walgenbach ◽  
Christiane Kuhl ◽  
Christian Rudlowski ◽  
Martin Poelcher ◽  
Axel Sauerwald ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (9) ◽  
pp. e29-e48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yara Bachour ◽  
Claudia A. Bargon ◽  
Christel J.M. de Blok ◽  
Johannes C.F. Ket ◽  
Marco J.P.F. Ritt ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marwan H Abboud ◽  
Ayush K Kapila ◽  
Svetlana Bogaert ◽  
Nicolas M Abboud

Abstract Background An increasing number of women wish breast implant removal whilst maintaining an acceptable projection and form were possible. Objectives The authors propose a technique to remodel the breast after implant removal utilizing internal suture loops to project the breast, recruit abdominal and axillary tissue cranially and medially, and provide a matrix for lipofilling. Methods A prospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients undergoing implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling. Patient characteristics were measured. The aesthetic results were evaluated by 2 independent raters. Patient-reported satisfaction was measured by standardized questionnaires. Results Implants in 52 patients with an average age of 55 and body mass index of 23.7 were extracted followed by breast remodeling. A total of 73% of patients had implants for aesthetic reasons, 41% were smokers, and 43% of the reconstruction cases received radiotherapy. A total of 28% had implant extraction for rupture, 58% for capsular contracture, and 14% due to pain and migration. The average volume of the implants removed was 292 cc, followed by an average lipofilling of 223 cc, yielding a ratio of 0.76 to 1. The average tissue recruited by loops was 82.5 cc. Independent raters measured 79% of results as good, 13% as acceptable, and 8% as requiring improvement; 80% of patients were satisfied to very satisfied. Conclusions The authors propose implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling can provide footprint definition, sustained projection, and high patient satisfaction. Moreover, the recruitment of a vascularized adipo-cutaneous flap by loops allows a reduced ratio of fat grafting to implant volume. Level of Evidence: 4


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold J. Brandon ◽  
Larry S. Nichter ◽  
Dwight D. Back

The IDEAL IMPLANT® Structured Breast Implant is a dual lumen saline-filled implant with capsular contracture and deflation/rupture rates much lower than single-lumen silicone gel-filled implants. To better understand the implant’s mechanical properties and to provide a potential explanation for these eight-year clinical results, a novel approach to compressive load testing was employed. Multi-dimensional strains and tangent moduli, metrics describing the shape stability of the total implant, were derived from the experimental load and platen spacing data. The IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have projection, diametric, and areal strains that were generally less than silicone gel implants, and tangent moduli that were generally greater than silicone gel implants. Despite having a relatively inviscid saline fill, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to be more shape stable compared to gel implants, which implies potentially less interaction with the capsule wall when the implant is subjected to compressive loads. Under compressive loads, the shape stability of a higher cross-link density, cohesive gel implant was unexpectedly found to be similar to or the same as a gel implant. In localized diametric compression testing, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have a palpability similar to a gel implant, but softer than a cohesive gel implant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document