scholarly journals New Evaluation Procedure for Multi-Dimensional Mechanical Strains and Tangent Moduli of Breast Implants: IDEAL IMPLANT® Structured Breast Implant Compared to Silicone Gel Implants

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold J. Brandon ◽  
Larry S. Nichter ◽  
Dwight D. Back

The IDEAL IMPLANT® Structured Breast Implant is a dual lumen saline-filled implant with capsular contracture and deflation/rupture rates much lower than single-lumen silicone gel-filled implants. To better understand the implant’s mechanical properties and to provide a potential explanation for these eight-year clinical results, a novel approach to compressive load testing was employed. Multi-dimensional strains and tangent moduli, metrics describing the shape stability of the total implant, were derived from the experimental load and platen spacing data. The IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have projection, diametric, and areal strains that were generally less than silicone gel implants, and tangent moduli that were generally greater than silicone gel implants. Despite having a relatively inviscid saline fill, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to be more shape stable compared to gel implants, which implies potentially less interaction with the capsule wall when the implant is subjected to compressive loads. Under compressive loads, the shape stability of a higher cross-link density, cohesive gel implant was unexpectedly found to be similar to or the same as a gel implant. In localized diametric compression testing, the IDEAL IMPLANT was found to have a palpability similar to a gel implant, but softer than a cohesive gel implant.

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1173-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin C. Lam ◽  
Gisela Walgenbach-Brünagel ◽  
Alexey Pryalukhin ◽  
Jens Vorhold ◽  
Thomas Pech ◽  
...  

Breast Care ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Jürgen Walgenbach ◽  
Christiane Kuhl ◽  
Christian Rudlowski ◽  
Martin Poelcher ◽  
Axel Sauerwald ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Medot ◽  
George H. Landis ◽  
Cindy E. McGregor ◽  
Karol A. Gutowski ◽  
Mary C. Foshager ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43
Author(s):  
Peter G Whidden

PG Whidden. Observations and conclusions from 20 years’ experience with the single-lumen inflatable breast implant with 3500 patients. Can J Plast Surg 1993;1(1):39-43. Thirty-five hundred patients underwent breast augmentation between April 1972 and April 1992; 68% were followed for a minimum of one year. The capsular contracture rate (Baker II or greater) was 8% and the product failure rate was 1%, using the Mentor/Heyer-Schulte RTV diaphragm-valve, centre-fill device. The replacement of an occasional deflated implant appears far preferable to the correction of the higher than 8% incidence of capsular contracture widely reported with the use of silicone gel-filled implants.


Author(s):  
Marwan H Abboud ◽  
Ayush K Kapila ◽  
Svetlana Bogaert ◽  
Nicolas M Abboud

Abstract Background An increasing number of women wish breast implant removal whilst maintaining an acceptable projection and form were possible. Objectives The authors propose a technique to remodel the breast after implant removal utilizing internal suture loops to project the breast, recruit abdominal and axillary tissue cranially and medially, and provide a matrix for lipofilling. Methods A prospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients undergoing implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling. Patient characteristics were measured. The aesthetic results were evaluated by 2 independent raters. Patient-reported satisfaction was measured by standardized questionnaires. Results Implants in 52 patients with an average age of 55 and body mass index of 23.7 were extracted followed by breast remodeling. A total of 73% of patients had implants for aesthetic reasons, 41% were smokers, and 43% of the reconstruction cases received radiotherapy. A total of 28% had implant extraction for rupture, 58% for capsular contracture, and 14% due to pain and migration. The average volume of the implants removed was 292 cc, followed by an average lipofilling of 223 cc, yielding a ratio of 0.76 to 1. The average tissue recruited by loops was 82.5 cc. Independent raters measured 79% of results as good, 13% as acceptable, and 8% as requiring improvement; 80% of patients were satisfied to very satisfied. Conclusions The authors propose implant extraction followed by power-assisted liposuction loops and lipofilling can provide footprint definition, sustained projection, and high patient satisfaction. Moreover, the recruitment of a vascularized adipo-cutaneous flap by loops allows a reduced ratio of fat grafting to implant volume. Level of Evidence: 4


2001 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Kj??ller ◽  
Lisbet R. H??lmich ◽  
Poul Harboe Jacobsen ◽  
S??ren Friis ◽  
Jon Fryzek ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document