scholarly journals Implementing a Comprehensive Relative-value—Based Incentive Plan in an Academic Family Medicine Department

2000 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 1159-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Steven Cramer ◽  
S. Ramalingam ◽  
Thomas C. Rosenthal ◽  
Chester H. Fox
Author(s):  
Amos Mailosi ◽  
Christina Miller ◽  
Catherine Hodge ◽  
Serah Msimuko

Within the community-orientated primary care module for training family physicians at the Kamuzu University of Health Sciences in Malawi, a relationship was formed between Nkhoma Mission Hospital’s Family Medicine Department and the Diamphwe Community Health Centre (HC) to strengthen the continuity of healthcare and capacity team building. The initial focus was on improving the management of hypertension and diabetes in terms of diagnosis, tracking of the patients in a registry and timely referral to secondary care facilities The relationship has received positive support from Diamphwe healthcare workers, which then improved the management of non-communicable diseases and patient care at Diamphwe. It has also shown how family medicine physicians can improve HC capacity through support and mentorship.


2015 ◽  
Vol 90 (12) ◽  
pp. 1691-1697
Author(s):  
Lars E. Peterson ◽  
Brenna Blackburn ◽  
Robert L. Phillips ◽  
Arch G. Mainous

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 466-473
Author(s):  
Anna Flattau ◽  
Jessica Cristallo ◽  
Mary Duggan ◽  
Maria Gbur ◽  
Marie-Louise Fabienne Daguilh ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt B. Angstman ◽  
Steven C. Adamson ◽  
Joseph W. Furst ◽  
Margaret S. Houston ◽  
James E. Rohrer

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-180
Author(s):  
Dean A. Seehusen ◽  
Tyler S. Rogers ◽  
Morhaf Al Achkar ◽  
Tammy Chang

Background and Objectives: Coaching, mentoring, and sponsoring are tools academic leaders can utilize to develop junior faculty. Each tool has a unique goal, time frame and method. It has been suggested that sponsoring may be a particularly useful tool for furthering the careers of women in medicine. Our primary aim was to understand to what extent one group of academic leaders—family medicine department chairs—have benefited from each tool in their own career development and how often they use each to develop others. A secondary aim was to compare women’s experiences with sponsorship to their male colleagues. Methods: We surveyed all US family medicine department chairs electronically about their experiences with coaching, mentoring, and sponsoring. We collected data from August 2019 to October 2019. Results: One hundred five of 193 family medicine department chairs responded to our survey (54.4% response rate). Most indicated that mentoring played a significant role in their career development, with fewer reporting coaching and sponsorship played significant roles. More reported frequent use of mentoring to develop faculty compared to coaching or sponsoring. Training in mentoring and sponsoring was associated with increased use, but coaching was not. No gender difference was found in this study population. Conclusions: Chairs have less experience with coaching and sponsoring than mentoring. Personal experience being coached, mentored, or sponsored was associated with increased use of these tools. Formal training may increase use of mentoring and sponsoring. Contrary to our hypothesis, female chairs’ experience with sponsoring was similar to their male peers.


PRiMER ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Ricco ◽  
Christine Danner ◽  
Chrystian Pereira ◽  
Ann M. Philbrick

Background and Objectives: The United States has seen an evolving perspective on the medical use of cannabis in recent years. Although a majority of states have enacted medical cannabis programs, physicians practicing in these states report a lack of knowledge, lingering concerns, and a need for more training regarding medical cannabis. This study provides a current snapshot of medical cannabis education in an academic family medicine department in a state with a medical cannabis program. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to all 134 faculty physicians and residents within a family medicine department to assess current knowledge and attitudes regarding medical cannabis. Study authors performed descriptive statistical analysis of the survey data. Results: Of the 61 individuals to complete the survey, 34 were residents and 27 were faculty. Overall, respondents displayed poor understanding of the state’s medical cannabis program as well as cannabis regulations. A majority of both faculty and residents reported low self-rated competency levels for medical cannabis efficacy, adverse effects, and safety using Likert scales (1 to 5; 1=low competency, 5=high competency). A majority of faculty (56%) expressed that they did not intend to certify patients for medical cannabis compared to only 33% of residents. Residents were statistically more likely to think of a patient who might benefit from medical cannabis compared to faculty (39% vs 11%, P=.004, chi-square). Conclusions: Increasingly, family physicians will be called on to provide informed patient counseling regarding medical cannabis. These results highlight a knowledge gap for family medicine learners in a changing practice landscape.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document