Isolated Acromioclavicular Joint Pathology in the Symptomatic Shoulder on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin H Gordon ◽  
Felix S Chew
2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth E.Shubin Stein ◽  
J.Michael Wiater ◽  
H.Charles Pfaff ◽  
Louis U. Bigliani ◽  
William N. Levine

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanna Medina ◽  
Guilherme Garofo ◽  
Caio O. D’Elia ◽  
Alexandre C. Bitar ◽  
Wagner Castropil ◽  
...  

Few complications regarding the use of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder have been reported. What motivated this case report was the unusual location of the anchor, found in the acromioclavicular joint which, to our knowledge, has never been reported so far. A 53-year old male with previous rotator cuff (RC) repair using bioabsorbable suture anchors presented with pain and weakness after 2 years of surgery. A suspicion of retear of the RC led to request of a magnetic resonance image, in which the implant was found located in the acromioclavicular joint. The complications reported with the use of metallic implants around the shoulder led to the development of bioabsorbable anchors. Advantages are their absorption over time, minimizing the risk of migration or interference with revision surgery, less artifacts with magnetic resonance imaging, and tendon-to-bone repair strength similar to metallic anchors. Since the use of bioabsorbable suture anchors is increasing, it is important to know the possible complications associated with these devices.


2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth E. Shubin Stein ◽  
Christopher S. Ahmad ◽  
Charles H. Pfaff ◽  
Louis U. Bigliani ◽  
William N. Levine

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Jens ◽  
T. Luijkx ◽  
F. F. Smithuis ◽  
M. Maas

The first imaging modality in patients suspected of distal radioulnar joint pathology should be conventional radiography to exclude or diagnose wrist pathology including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease, (healed) fractures, or impaction syndromes. When conventional radiography is inconclusive, high resolution 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging is advised. We provide a broad overview of the literature regarding the use of intra-articular contrast both with computed tomography (CTA) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRA). Conventional arthrography and unenhanced computed tomography are not indicated. This article discusses the most useful imaging techniques in terms of clinical indications, patient positioning, technical imaging requirements, and diagnostic performance in patients with suspected distal radioulnar joint pathology. Furthermore, the most prevalent pathologies are discussed, with the focus on imaging characteristics in both stable and unstable distal radioulnar joints.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document