Long term functional outcome of operatively treated tibial plateau fractures.

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Stevens ◽  
R Beharry ◽  
J P Waddell ◽  
E H Schemitsch
Author(s):  
Vijaysing S. Chandele ◽  
Abhishek P. Bhalotia ◽  
Milind V. Ingle ◽  
Maroti R. Koichade

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> <span lang="EN-GB">Management of tibial plateau fractures with coronal fractures especially posteromedial fragment is frequent and challenging. This study was conducted to </span><span lang="EN-IN">evaluate the</span><span lang="EN-GB"> functional outcome of patients with tibial plateau fractures having posteromedial fragment treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using Lobenhoffer approach</span><span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> <span lang="EN-GB">Thirty two patients with tibial plateau fractures having posteromedial fracture alone or part of bicondylar fracture was operated with ORIF using Lobenhoffer approach. Time to union, maintenance of alignment, rate of complications and functional outcome was assessed using Oxford knee score</span>.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> <span lang="EN-GB">The mean </span><span lang="EN-IN">time to healing was 16.4 weeks, without any complication in the form of non-union and infection. Malunion with secondary loss of alignment was seen in only one case due to fracture comminution and early weight bearing. Oxford knee score was good to excellent in all the cases. </span></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> <span lang="EN-GB">With recent development in understanding these fractures, ORIF gives excellent to good outcome in all patients operated through Lobenhoffer approach. Long term disability can be prevented by maintenance of adequate alignment and reduction through direct visualization of fracture</span><span lang="EN-IN">.</span></p>


2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 312-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Stevens ◽  
Rani Beharry ◽  
Michael D. McKee ◽  
James P. Waddell ◽  
Emil H. Schemitsch

Injury ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1608-1612 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.L.M. van Dreumel ◽  
B.P.W. van Wunnik ◽  
L. Janssen ◽  
P.C.G. Simons ◽  
H.M.J. Janzing

Injury ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2807-2813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Hanke ◽  
Martin Bäumlein ◽  
Siegmund Lang ◽  
Boyko Gueorguiev ◽  
Michael Nerlich ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1009-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. N. Ramoutar ◽  
K. Lefaivre ◽  
H. Broekhuyse ◽  
P. Guy ◽  
P. O’Brien

Aims The aim of this study was to determine the trajectory of recovery following fixation of tibial plateau fractures up to five-year follow-up, including simple (Schatzker I-IV) versus complex (Schatzker V-VI) fractures. Patients and Methods Patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for tibial plateau fractures were enrolled into a prospective database. Functional outcome, using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary (SF-36 PCS), was collected at baseline, six months, one year, and five years. The trajectory of recovery for complex fractures (Schatzker V and VI) was compared with simple fractures (Schatzker I to IV). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated between timepoints. In all, 182 patients were enrolled: 136 (74.7%) in simple and 46 (25.3%) in complex. There were 103 female patients and 79 male patients with a mean age of 45.8 years (15 to 86). Results Mean SF-36 PCS improved significantly in both groups from six to 12 months (p < 0.001) and one to five years (simple, p = 0.008; complex, p = 0.007). In both groups, the baseline scores were not reached at five years. The SF-36 PCS was significantly higher in the simple group compared with the complex group at both six months (p = 0.007) and 12 months (p = 0.01), but not at five years (p = 0.17). Between each timepoint, approximately 50% or more of the patients in each group achieved an MCID in their score change, indicating a significant clinical change in condition. The complex group had a much larger drop off in the first six months, with comparable proportions achieving MCID at the subsequent time intervals. Conclusion Tibial plateau fracture recovery was characterized overall by an initial decline in functional outcome from baseline, followed by a steep improvement from six to 12 months, and ongoing recovery up to five years. In simple patterns, patients tended to achieve a higher functional score by six months compared with the complex patterns. However, comparable functional scores between the groups achieved only at the five-year point suggest later recovery in the complex group. Function does not improve to baseline by five years in either group. This information is useful in counselling patients about the course of prospective recovery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1009–1014.


Author(s):  
Hrishikesh Saodekar ◽  
Kamal Agrawal

Introduction: Tibial plateau fractures are complex injuries of proximal tibia which are produced by high- or low-energy trauma and principally affect young adult population. These fractures usually have associated soft-tissue lesions affecting the treatment. Posterior tibial plateau fractures (PTPF), may be medial or lateral, are common and they occur in about 28.8% patients as a part of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. These fractures are difficult to reduce, therefore articular incongruity was not found to be detrimental factor in final functional outcomes. Studies have supported the fact that residual articular incongruence is well tolerated by proximal tibial plateau fracture in the form of minimal functional limitation or onset of arthrosis.  Anterolateral and anteromedial surgical approaches do not show adequate reduction and fixation of posterolateral and posteromedial fragments. To achieve this, it is advised to reduce and fix the fracture through specific posterolateral or posteromedial approaches that allow optimal reduction and plate/screw placement. Material and Methods: This comparative prospective cohort study on done on 50 adult patients. Two groups were formed: Group A – double-plate fixation with both posterior and anterolateral  having 25 participants and Group B – single anterolateral plate fixation having 25 participants in PTPFs were followed up to 1 year. For Group A, the reduction was done under direct vision and assisted with fluoroscopy in two planes. The reduction was assessed with submeniscal approach. In Group B posterior fragment was reduced by screws through the anterolateral plate followed by CT scan. Patients were evaluated by radiographs every 6 weeks till fracture union is evident. Fracture union was assessed by cortical continuity and progressive loss of fracture line on X-rays. Functional status at 1-year postoperative CT scanogram was done at final follow up to record articular subsidence, nonunion, coronal, or sagittal deformities. Knee functions were assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 subjective knee evaluation form and objective functional Knee Society Score (KSS). Results: There were 22 male and 3 female in Group A while in Group B there were 20 male and 5 female. Right tibial fracture was observed in 15 cases and left in 10 cases in group A while in Group B right fracture was seen in 17 cases and in 8 cases left sided fracture. 23 cases each in group A and B were associated with RTA. Operative time (minutes) in group A and group B was 124 ± 26.7 and 79.52± 16.22 respectively. Total mean hospitalization days were 9.4±2.6 in group A and 8.2±1.5 in group B. Union time in group A was 14.6±3.4 weeks while in group B was 15.4±3.2. Statistically significant correlation was observed in group A and B with respect to KSS clinical outcome and KSS functional outcome. Flexion deformity was observed in 3 (12%) cases in group A and in 6 (24%) cases in group B. Conclusion:  PTPF can achieve an early and satisfactory functional outcome. Rehabilitation and fracture healing are better in PTPF. Keywords: Tibial plateau fractures, PTPF, Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document