Does Spinal Instrumentation Influence the Healing Process of Posterolateral Spinal Fusion?

Spine ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1058-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kanayama ◽  
Bryan W. Cunningham ◽  
John C. Sefter ◽  
Jeffrey A. Goldstein ◽  
Geoffrey Stewart ◽  
...  
1997 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1710-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kanayama ◽  
Bryan W. Cunningham ◽  
James C. Weis ◽  
Larry M. Parker ◽  
Kiyoshi Kaneda ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Morone ◽  
Henry Feuer

The goal of spinal arthrodesis is a solid osseous union across one or more spinal segments. A solid bone union after arthrodesis is commonly known as a spinal fusion. Surgeons have begun to understand the biomechanical and biological factors that influence the bone-healing process. One of the most commonly used adjuncts is spinal instrumentation. Instrumentation has increased the spinal fusion rate; however, fusion failure (that is, nonunion or pseudarthrosis) remains significant. A less commonly used adjunct is electrical stimulation (ES). Investigators in experimental studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of ES on increasing the fusion rate. In this review the authors discuss the evidence concerning the benefits of ES as an adjunct to spinal arthrodesis. In addition, the different types of ES devices are described along with the current experimental and clinical evidence for each type of device.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 940-944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Urrutia ◽  
Jorge Briceno ◽  
Maximiliano Carmona ◽  
Fernando Olavarria ◽  
Felipe Hodgson

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Aebersold ◽  
W. P. Hnat ◽  
M. J. Voor ◽  
R. M. Puno ◽  
D. J. Jackson ◽  
...  

Lumbar arthrodesis or spinal fusion is usually performed to relieve back pain, and regain functionality from degenerative disc disease, trauma, etc. Fusion is determined from radiographic images (X-ray) or computed tomography scans, yet these inspection procedures are subjective methods of review. As a result, exploratory surgery is performed if the presence of fusion cannot be confirmed. Therefore, a need exists to provide objective data to determine the presence of fusion that could avoid the cost, pain, and risk of exploratory surgery. One method to achieve this objective is to observe bending strain from spinal rods implanted during surgery. A system has been developed that will attach to the spinal instrumentation rods, transmit strain information wirelessly, and without the use of batteries. Major components of the system include a strain transferring sensor housing, a microelectromechanical (MEMS)-based strain sensor, telemetry circuitry, and antennae. Only discussed herein are the design, testing, and results of the housing without a cover and its ability to transfer strain from the rod to an internal surface where a foil strain gage is attached to characterize strain transfer efficiency. Strain gauges rather than the MEMS sensor were employed for housing characterization due cost and limited availability. Design constraints for the housing are long-term implantation, small size, greater than 95% transfer of bending strain from the spinal rods to the internal strain sensor, and ease of installation. ABAQUS finite element modeling software was employed to develop a working model that was fabricated using polyetheretherkeytone. The housing underwent cycle testing in a material testing system to simulate long-term implantation along with static testing to determine if creep was present. Both series of tests showed that the housing’s response did not degrade over a period of time and there was no indication of creep. The experimental results also validated the results of the ABAQUS finite element model.


Spine ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1318-1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiyoshi Koga ◽  
Yasuaki Tokuhashi ◽  
Akihiro Ohkawa ◽  
Taichi Nishimura ◽  
Kazushi Takayama ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.S. Shamsul ◽  
K.K. Tan ◽  
H.C. Chen ◽  
B.S. Aminuddin ◽  
B.H.I. Ruszymah

Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (14) ◽  
pp. 944-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mechteld Lehr ◽  
F. Cumhur Oner ◽  
Diyar Delawi ◽  
Rebecca K. Stellato ◽  
Eric A. Hoebink ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 457-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Ma ◽  
Xiaoming Wu ◽  
Yaoping Wu ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Zhuo Xiong ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. MacEwan ◽  
Michael R. Talcott ◽  
Daniel W. Moran ◽  
Eric C. Leuthardt

OBJECTIVE Instrumented spinal fusion continues to exhibit high failure rates in patients undergoing multilevel lumbar fusion or pseudarthrosis revision; with Grade II or higher spondylolisthesis; or in those possessing risk factors such as obesity, tobacco use, or metabolic disorders. Direct current (DC) electrical stimulation of bone growth represents a unique surgical adjunct in vertebral fusion procedures, yet existing spinal fusion stimulators are not optimized to enhance interbody fusion. To develop an advanced method of applying DC electrical stimulation to promote interbody fusion, a novel osteogenic spinal system capable of routing DC through rigid instrumentation and into the vertebral bodies was fabricated. A pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility of osteogenic instrumentation and compare the ability of osteogenic instrumentation to promote successful interbody fusion in vivo to standard spinal instrumentation with autograft. METHODS Instrumented, single-level, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with autologous graft was performed at L4–5 in adult Toggenburg/Alpine goats, using both osteogenic spinal instrumentation (plus electrical stimulation) and standard spinal instrumentation (no electrical stimulation). At terminal time points (3 months, 6 months), animals were killed and lumbar spines were explanted for radiographic analysis using a SOMATOM Dual Source Definition CT Scanner and high-resolution Microcat II CT Scanner. Trabecular continuity, radiodensity within the fusion mass, and regional bone formation were examined to determine successful spinal fusion. RESULTS Quantitative analysis of average bone density in pedicle screw beds confirmed that electroactive pedicle screws used in the osteogenic spinal system focally enhanced bone density in instrumented vertebral bodies. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of high-resolution CT scans of explanted lumbar spines further demonstrated that the osteogenic spinal system induced solid bony fusion across the L4–5 disc space as early as 6 weeks postoperatively. In comparison, inactive spinal instrumentation with autograft was unable to promote successful interbody fusion by 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Results of this study demonstrate that novel osteogenic spinal instrumentation supports interbody fusion through the focal delivery of DC electrical stimulation. With further technical development and scientific/clinical validation, osteogenic spinal instrumentation may offer a unique alternative to biological scaffolds and pharmaceutical adjuncts used in spinal fusion procedures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document