Anterior Cervical Reconstruction Using Titanium Cages With Anterior Plating

Spine ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (15) ◽  
pp. 1604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad E. Majd ◽  
Mukta Vadhva ◽  
Richard T. Holt
2013 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. 801-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albrecht Waschke ◽  
Szymon Kaczor ◽  
Jan Walter ◽  
Pedro Duenisch ◽  
Rolf Kalff ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hwan T. Hee ◽  
Mohammad E. Majd ◽  
Richard T. Holt ◽  
Thomas S. Whitecloud, ◽  
David Pienkowski

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342097778
Author(s):  
Muhammad Tahir ◽  
Faridullah Khan Zimri ◽  
Nadeem Ahmed ◽  
Allah Rakhio Jamali ◽  
Ghulam Mehboob ◽  
...  

This prospective, multi-centred, randomized trial examined outcomes of 3- and 12-month follow-ups of 159 elderly participants aged more than 75 years with isolated distal radial fractures, treated by anterior locking plate or closed reduction and cast immobilization. The primary outcome was the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score. The PRWE score at 12 months was not significantly different between the two groups; however, the radiological outcomes and complications rates were worse in the casting group. Level of evidence: III


2020 ◽  
pp. 175319342096623
Author(s):  
James A. Morris ◽  
Max Little ◽  
Thomas Ashdown ◽  
Oliver T. Clough ◽  
Timothy Packer ◽  
...  

We undertook a matched prospective cohort study over a 4-year period to examine the safety of continuing the administration of regular antithrombotic treatment with warfarin, clopidogrel or aspirin during day case surgical fixation of distal radial fractures. One hundred and one patients were identified and consented to participate in this study. There was only one reported complication: a superficial wound infection treated with antibiotics. No episodes of excessive bleeding were noted intraoperatively. All patients were discharged home on the day of surgery and there were no episodes of readmission, significant bleeding, haematoma requiring intervention, compartment syndrome or wound dehiscence. Complication rates were comparable with those of the matched cohort of patients undergoing the same procedure but who were not taking antithrombotic medications. Level of evidence: IV


Author(s):  
Joseph L. Laratta ◽  
Bradley J. Vivace ◽  
Mónica López-Peña ◽  
Fernando Muñoz Guzón ◽  
Antonio Gonzalez-Cantalpeidra ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2473011416S0004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carroll P. Jones ◽  
Bruce Cohen ◽  
John Lewis ◽  
W. Hodges Davis

Author(s):  
Benjamin Babic ◽  
Lars Mortimer Schiffmann ◽  
Hans Friedrich Fuchs ◽  
Dolores Thea Mueller ◽  
Thomas Schmidt ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Esophagectomy is the gold standard in the surgical therapy of esophageal cancer. It is either performed thoracoabdominal with a intrathoracic anastomosis or in proximal cancers with a three-incision esophagectomy and cervical reconstruction. Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) is the most common functional postoperative disorder after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (IL). Pneumonia is significantly more often in patients with DGCE. It remains unclear if DGCE anastomotic leakage (AL) is associated. Aim of our study is to analyze, if AL is more likely to happen in patients with a DGCE. Patients and methods 816 patients were included. All patients have had an IL due to esophageal/esophagogastric-junction cancer between 2013 and 2018 in our center. Intrathoracic esophagogastric end-to-side anastomosis was performed with a circular stapling device. The collective has been divided in two groups depending on the occurrence of DGCE. The diagnosis DGCE was determined by clinical and radiologic criteria in accordance with current international expert consensus. Results 27.7% of all patients suffered from DGCE postoperatively. Female patients had a significantly higher chance to suffer from DGCE than male patients (34.4% vs. 26.2% vs., p = 0.040). Pneumonia was more common in patients with DGCE (13.7% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.025), furthermore hospitalization was longer in DGCE patients (median 17 days vs. 14d, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of type II anastomotic leakage, (5.8% in both groups DGCE). All patients with ECCG type II AL (n = 47; 5.8%) were treated successfully by endoluminal/endoscopic therapy. The subgroup analysis showed that ASA ≥ III (7.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.05) and the histology squamous cell carcinoma (9.8% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of an AL. Conclusion Our study confirms that DGCE after IL is a common finding in a standardized collective of patients in a high-volume center. This functional disorder is associated with a higher rate of pneumonia and a prolonged hospital stay. Still, there is no association between DGCE and the occurrence of an AL after esophagectomy. The hypothesis, that an DGCE results in a higher pressure on the anastomosis and therefore to an AL in consequence, can be refuted. DGCE is not a pathogenetic factor for an AL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document