Hemodynamic Compromising Antibody Mediated Rejection (HC-AMR) After Heart Transplantation (HTX).

2014 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 432 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Aliabadi ◽  
K. Uyanik-Uenal ◽  
J. Goekler ◽  
S. Wallner ◽  
M. Masseti ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle M. Kittleson ◽  
Nikhil Patel ◽  
David H. Chang ◽  
Evan P. Kransdorf ◽  
Jon A. Kobashigawa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Bernd Ludwig ◽  
Johanna Schneider ◽  
Daniela Föll ◽  
Qian Zhou

Abstract Background Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in cardiac transplantation may manifest early within the first weeks after transplantation but also late after months to years following transplantation resulting in mild heart failure to cardiogenic shock. While patients with early cardiac AMR are less affected and seem to have survival rates comparable to transplant recipients without AMR, late cardiac AMR is frequently associated with graft dysfunction, fulminant forms of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and a high mortality rate. Nevertheless, AMR of cardiac allografts remains difficult to diagnose and to treat. Case summary We report the case of a 47-year-old male patient with late AMR of the cardiac allograft 3 years after heart transplantation. Antibody-mediated rejection was confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy and the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). The patient was treated with high dose of prednisolone, plasmapheresis, intravenous Gamma Globulin, rituximab, immunoadsorption, and bortezomib. Under this treatment regimen left ventricular ejection fraction and pro B-type natriuretic peptide recovered, and the patient improved to New York Heart Association Class I. Currently, 3 years after the diagnosis of cardiac AMR, graft function continues to be nearly normal, and there is no evidence for transplant vasculopathy. Discussion This case illustrates that AMR can occur at any time after transplantation. Although graft function fully recovered after treatment in our patient, the level of DSA remained high, suggesting that DSA may not be a reliable parameter to determine the intensity and duration of the therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. S387
Author(s):  
A. Schaefer ◽  
G. Böhmig ◽  
A. Zuckermann ◽  
G. Fischer ◽  
G. Laufer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Rywik ◽  
A Braniewska ◽  
I Kowalik ◽  
M Firczuk ◽  
K Kozar-Kaminska ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The role of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) in heart transplantation (HT) is not well defined. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate prospectively the dynamic changes of circulating EPC levels in relation to post-HT rejection risk. Methods There were 27 HT recipients who had EPC from peripheral blood quantified during 6 months follow-up after HT. Patients were monitored regularly, by right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy assessment, for cellular rejection (ACR) defined as grade ≥2 or an antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) characterized by histopathological changes recorded as AMR1H. The primary end-point was acute rejection, either AMR or ACR. Results ACR and AMR were observed in 7 (25.9%) and 6 (22.2%) subjects respectively. EPC levels, after logarithmic transformation, immediately post-HT were alike regardless of ACR status, however patients with lower EPC were at risk of AMR at 1 month (Table 1). On the other hand patients with a significant reduction of EPC at 1 month post-HT compared with HT were less likely to have either ACR or AMR (p=0.0003). During longer post-HT observation (12 months) patients had similar EPC levels regardless of the rejection events. Dynamic changes in EPC levels are presented in figure. Nonetheless, greater changes in EPC expressed by coefficient of variation were associated with the risk of either AMR or ACR compared to the participants without rejection (mean [lower–upper quartile]) 15 [13–18] vs 8 [5–13]; p=0.02) and (22 [14–26] vs 8 [5–13]; p=0.01) respectively. EPC by rejection – 1st month following HT ACR (+) AMR (+) ACR (−) and AMR (−) p^ p p N=3 (mean± SD) N=4 (mean± SD) N=20 (mean± SD) ACR (+) vs ACR (−) and AMR (−) AMR (+) vs ACR (−) and AMR (−) EPC log HT 5.14±1.55 3.81±1.01 5.30±0.88 0.0325 0.97 0.025 EPC log M1 4.97±0.59 3.69±1.33 4.15±1.29 0.4160 0.55 0.78 Delta EPC log M1-HT -0.17±1.98* −0.12±1.30* −1.15±1.18# 0.2195 0.44 0.32 ACR – acute cellular rejection; AMR or – acute antibody-mediated rejection; EPC log – endothelial progenitor cells after logarithmic transformation; HT – within 24 hours post-transplantation; M1 – at 1-month post-transplantation; Delta EPC log M1-HT – difference in EPC log between M1 and HT. #p=0.0003 for the difference between M1 vs HT; *p=ns for the difference between M1 vs HT; ^pP – for the difference among the groups. Changes in EPC level post-HT Conclusions Early reduction of EPC levels was predictive of a lower risk of ACR or AMR. Greater dynamic changes of EPC during 6 months of observation were associated with a higher risk of rejection suggesting an important role of EPC in the pathological processes post-HT. Thus our findings suggest significant role of EPC post-HT with respect to rejection status. Acknowledgement/Funding Intramural research grant from the Institute of Cardiology


2018 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
pp. 1351-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grecia M. Marrón-Liñares ◽  
Lucía Núñez ◽  
María G. Crespo-Leiro ◽  
Eloy Álvarez-López ◽  
Eduardo Barge-Caballero ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. S171-S171
Author(s):  
M.E. Richmond ◽  
R.K. Singh ◽  
L.A. Gilmore ◽  
K. Beddows ◽  
J.M. Chen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document