TREATMENT OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH EARLY STAGE CERVICAL CANCER TREATED WITH LAPAROTOMY COMPARED TO ROBOTICALLY ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACH

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
K. Seader ◽  
S. Rao ◽  
Y. Hemida ◽  
E. Hashemi ◽  
M. Pitter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

scholarly journals Retrospective Analysis of Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcomes: Ten Years of Experience with the Vaginal Assisted Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy VARLH

2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
R. Wojdat ◽  
E. Malanowska
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Invasive Cervical Cancer ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Background. LACC trial demonstrated inferiority of laparoscopic approach for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. There are still limited data from retrospective trials regarding whether survival outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy are equivalent to those after open abdominal radical hysterectomy. In this study, we present results of combined vaginal radical laparoscopic hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Methods. This retrospective study was carried out at the Department of Gynecology in Mathilden Hospital (Herford, Germany). Between January 2008 and April 2018, all the patients with invasive cervical cancer who underwent combined vaginal assisted radical laparoscopic hysterectomy (VARLH) without the use of any uterine manipulator were enrolled to the study. Results. A total number of 124 patients with diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer were enrolled in the study. All of the patients underwent minimally invasive surgery and were divided according to FIGO 2019: stage IA (25.9%), IB1 (25.0%), IB2-IIB (28.4%), and III/IV (20.7%). Overall, the mean age of the patients was 51.84 years. After a study collection, a median follow-up was 45.6 (range 23.7-76.5) months. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates for early-stage cervical cancer were both 98%, and the 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 100% and 97%, respectively. We have not observed any recurrence in our study group of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Conclusions. Combined VARLH can be considered a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Surgical strategy with oncological principles determines the quality and long-term success of the operation in early cervical cancer regardless of laparoscopic approach.

scholarly journals Robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-42
Author(s):  
Gun Oh Chong
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Robotic Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

Robotic technology has recently come into widespread use to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. Most comparative studies showed that blood loss and hospital stays for patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery, including robotic procedures, were superior compared to open surgery. Moreover, the survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy were not inferior to open radical hysterectomy. Unexpectedly, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, a randomized, open-label, noninferiority study that compared minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with open radical hysterectomy, revealed that minimally invasive surgery was associated with a higher risk of recurrence and death compared with open surgery. Strict guidelines for robotic radical hysterectomy for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer should be established in accordance with objective Korean data. In addition, it is recommended that further studies should be performed on how to avoid the use of uterine manipulators and the dissemination of cancer cells by ensuring a more effective vaginal closure using a standardized approach.

Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy Is an Alternative to Laparotomy With Improved Perioperative Outcomes in Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Kucukmetin ◽  
Ioannis Biliatis ◽  
Nithya Ratnavelu ◽  
Amit Patel ◽  
Iain Cameron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Radical Trachelectomy ◽  
Late Morbidity ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

ObjectiveRadical trachelectomy is an established surgical approach for managing young women with cervical cancer wishing to preserve fertility. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic (LRT) and abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART).MethodsWe reviewed the records of all women undergoing either LRT or ART in our institution since 2004. Demographic data, clinicopathologic data, and perioperative outcomes were collected and compared between the 2 procedures.ResultsOverall, 27 women were identified. All of them had stage IB1 disease. Eleven (40.8%) women underwent LRT, whereas 16 (59.2%) women underwent ART. Age, parity, and body mass index, as well as histologic type, grade, and presence of lymphovascular space invasion were comparable between groups. The median length of the parametrial tissue removed was shorter in LRT versus ART (P = 0.022). The median blood loss and length of stay were significantly reduced in the LRT group (85 vs 800 mL, P < 0.001; and 4 versus 7 days, P = 0.003). The median operative time was longer with the laparoscopic approach (320 versus 192.5 minutes, P < 0.001). Early grade 1 to 2 postoperative morbidity (mainly high urinary residuals) was comparable between groups; however, more grade 3 and late morbidity events were recorded in the ART group.ConclusionsThis first comparison study between LRT and ART for fertility preservation in women with cervical cancer shows that laparoscopy performed better in terms of blood loss and length of stay. Laparoscopic radical trachelectomy could be the preferred option for these patients; however, further studies are needed to confirm comparable survival outcomes.

scholarly journals Total Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy Using the No-look No-touch Technique

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Fusegi ◽  
Hiroyuki Kanao
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Tumor Spillage

AbstractRadical hysterectomy is a standard operation for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Over the recent decades, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has been considered an alternative treatment. In 2018, the results of the laparoscopic approach to cervical cancer trial suggested that women with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy had poorer prognosis than those who underwent open surgery. This finding was unexpected, and direct evidence supporting poor prognosis related to minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was not available because the trial was not designed to evaluate the cause of the inferior outcomes. Tumor spillage caused by surgeon-related factors, including squeezing of the uterine cervix and tumor exposure to circulating CO2 gas, is considered to be associated with the poor prognosis of patients who underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. We believe that protective maneuver to avoid tumor spillage is the key to improve oncologic outcomes of cervical cancer. Here, we present a procedure of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in which techniques, such as the “no-look no-touch technique,” were used to prevent tumor spillage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document