Comparison of Reporting Systems to Determine Concussion Incidence in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Booher ◽  
John Wisniewski ◽  
Bryan W. Smith ◽  
Asgeir Sigurdsson
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1974-1981
Author(s):  
Gabriel J. Sanders ◽  
Brad Roll ◽  
Corey A. Peacock ◽  
Roger O. Kollock

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 314-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Baugh ◽  
Patrick T. Kiernan ◽  
Emily Kroshus ◽  
Daniel H. Daneshvar ◽  
Philip H. Montenigro ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Marlene Mawson ◽  
William T. Bowler

The 1984 Supreme Court ruling in the antitrust suit between the Universities of Oklahoma and Georgia, representing the College Football Association (CFA), versus the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) provided mat individual institutions had proper authority to sell television rights to their football games. The NCAA had controlled television appearances of collegiate football teams with the rationale of preventing erosion of game attendance due to televised home football games. Records of home games televised, television revenues from football games, and attendance at televised football games were gathered from 57% of NCAA Division I institutions and compared for a 3-year period prior to the 1984 ruling, with a 3-year period following the ruling. Four sets oft tests between mean data for the pre- and posttime periods showed that although the number of games scheduled per season remained the same, the number of televised football games significantly increased, the television revenues from football remained constant, and attendance at televised home football games decreased significantly after the 1984 ruling.


2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Klenosky ◽  
Thomas J. Templin ◽  
Josh A. Troutmam

This paper reports the results of an empirical study that draws on a means-end perspective to examine the factors influencing the school choice decisions of collegiate student athletes. A sample of 27 NCAA Division I collegiate football players were questioned to identify the attributes that differentiated the school they selected from the others they had considered attending. The interviewing technique known as laddering was then used to link the salient attributes of the chosen school to the consequences and personal values important to the athlete. An analysis of the resulting data provided unique insight into the means-end relationships that underlie students' selection of competing athletic programs. A discussion of the study findings outlined the implications of this investigation and the means-end approach for future recruiting and research efforts.


1985 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-344
Author(s):  
John F. Seggar ◽  
Darl McBride ◽  
Lucile D. Cannon

Using Pareto’s concept of circulation of elites as a guiding principle, the Associated Press (AP) final Collegiate football polls were analyzed for the years 1968-1984. It appears that Pareto’s conception of the circulation of elites is a useful framework in understanding the changes that occur in the rankings of NCAA Division I football teams as measured by the AP final polls. There appears to be three levels of circulation: (a) those involved in very minor shifts up and down; (b) those that shift considerably but still remain in the standings; and (c) those that circulate in and out of the polls.


1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy B. Parker

The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the experiences of former college football players upon exiting intercollegiate careers. The qualitative methodology of in-depth, dialogic interviewing was employed. Participants were 7 former NCAA Division I-A collegiate football players who completed their eligibility within the last 3 years and who were at least 8 months removed from collegiate competition. These participants were not under contract with any professional teams at the time of their interviews. Findings centered around the following themes: (a) the transition from high school to elite-level college football, and the change in the relationships participants had with their coaches; (b) the learning of behavior not positively transferable to the “real world”; (c) the power and control issues surrounding the major college football setting, and the manner in which participants perceived, and responded to, being controlled; and (d) the ways participants were experiencing posteligibility life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document