#494 Use of clinical practice guidelines reduces hospitalization rate and length of stay in sickle cell disease

1999 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 336
Author(s):  
J. L. Anderson ◽  
K M Ryan ◽  
T. Clair ◽  
M. E. Osband
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasser S. Amer ◽  
Yasser Sabr ◽  
Ghada M. ElGohary ◽  
Amer M. Altaki ◽  
Osamah T. Khojah ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The management of pregnant women with sickle cell disease (SCD) poses a major challenge for maternal healthcare services owing to the potential for complications associated with morbidity and mortality. Trustworthy evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have a major impact on the positive outcomes of appropriate healthcare. The objective of this study was to critically appraise the quality of recent CPGs for SCD in pregnant women. Methods Clinical questions were identified and the relevant CPG and bibliographic databases were searched and screened for eligible CPGs. Each CPG was appraised by four independent appraisers using the AGREE II Instrument. Inter-rater analysis was conducted. Results Four eligible CPGs were appraised: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Among them, the overall assessments of three CPGs (NICE, RCOG, NHLBI) scored greater than 70%; these findings were consistent with the high scores in the six domains of AGREE II, including:[1] scope and purpose,[2] stakeholder involvement,[3] rigor of development,[4] clarity of presentation,[5] applicability, and [6] editorial independence domains. Domain [3] scored (90%, 73%, 71%), domain [5] (90%, 46%, 47%), and domain [6] (71%, 77%, 52%) for NICE, RCOG, and NHLBI, respectively. Overall, the clinical recommendations were not significantly different between the included CPGs. Conclusions Three evidence-based CPGs presented superior methodological quality. NICE demonstrated the highest quality followed by RCOG and NHLBI and all three CPGs were recommended for use in practice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e433-e442
Author(s):  
Alyssa A. Schatz ◽  
Thomas K. Oliver ◽  
Robert A. Swarm ◽  
Judith A. Paice ◽  
Deepika S. Darbari ◽  
...  

Opioids are a critical component of pain relief strategies for the management of patients with cancer and sickle cell disease. The escalation of opioid addiction and overdose in the United States has led to increased scrutiny of opioid prescribing practices. Multiple reports have revealed that regulatory and coverage policies, intended to curb inappropriate opioid use, have created significant barriers for many patients. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and ASCO each publish clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic pain. A recent JAMA Oncology article highlighted perceived variability in recommendations among these guidelines. In response, leadership from guideline organizations, government representatives, and authors of the original article met to discuss challenges and solutions. The meeting featured remarks by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, presentations on each clinical practice guideline, an overview of the pain management needs of patients with sickle cell disease, an overview of perceived differences among guidelines, and a discussion of differences and commonalities among the guidelines. The meeting revealed that although each guideline varies in the intended patient population, target audience, and methodology, there is no disagreement among recommendations when applied to the appropriate patient and clinical situation. It was determined that clarification and education are needed regarding the intent, patient population, and scope of each clinical practice guideline, rather than harmonization of guideline recommendations. Clinical practice guidelines can serve as a resource for policymakers and payers to inform policy and coverage determinations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa A. Schatz ◽  
Thomas K. Oliver ◽  
Robert A. Swarm ◽  
Judith A. Paice ◽  
Deepika S. Darbari ◽  
...  

Opioids are a critical component of pain relief strategies for the management of patients with cancer and sickle cell disease. The escalation of opioid addiction and overdose in the United States has led to increased scrutiny of opioid prescribing practices. Multiple reports have revealed that regulatory and coverage policies, intended to curb inappropriate opioid use, have created significant barriers for many patients. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Society of Clinical Oncology each publish clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic pain. A recent JAMA Oncology article highlighted perceived variability in recommendations among these guidelines. In response, leadership from guideline organizations, government representatives, and authors of the original article met to discuss challenges and solutions. The meeting featured remarks by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, presentations on each clinical practice guideline, an overview of the pain management needs of patients with sickle cell disease, an overview of perceived differences among guidelines, and a discussion of differences and commonalities among the guidelines. The meeting revealed that although each guideline varies in the intended patient population, target audience, and methodology, there is no disagreement among recommendations when applied to the appropriate patient and clinical situation. It was determined that clarification and education are needed regarding the intent, patient population, and scope of each clinical practice guideline, rather than harmonization of guideline recommendations. Clinical practice guidelines can serve as a resource for policymakers and payers to inform policy and coverage determinations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 976-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol Utrankar ◽  
Tilicia L Mayo-Gamble ◽  
Whitney Allen ◽  
Laurie Novak ◽  
Adetola A Kassim ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a chronic condition affecting over 100 000 individuals in the United States, predominantly from vulnerable populations. Clinical practice guidelines, written for providers, have low adherence. This study explored knowledge about guidelines; desire for guidelines; and how technology could support guideline awareness and adherence, examining current technology uses, and user preferences to inform design of a patient-centered guidelines application in a chronic disease. Methods This cross-sectional mixed-methods study involved semi-structured interviews, surveys, and focus groups of adolescents and adults with SCD. We evaluated interest, preferences, and anticipated benefits or barriers of a patient-centered adaptation of SCD practice guidelines; prospective technology uses for health; and barriers to technology utilization. Results Forty-seven individuals completed surveys and interviews, and 39 participated in three separate focus groups. Most participants (91%) were unaware of SCD guidelines, but almost all (96%) expressed interest in a guidelines application, identifying benefits (knowledge, activation, individualization, and rewards), and barriers (poor information, low motivation, and resource limitations). Current technology health uses included information access, care coordination, and reminders about health-related actions. Prospective technology uses included informational messaging and timely alerts. Barriers to technology use included lack of interest, lack of utility, and preference for direct communication. Conclusions This study’s findings can inform the design of clinical practice guideline applications, suggesting a promising role for technology to engage patients, facilitate care decisions and actions, and improve outcomes.


2020 ◽  
pp. 001857872095417
Author(s):  
Katherine Rector ◽  
Shelby Merchant ◽  
Rachel Crawford ◽  
Justin R. Arnall ◽  
James Symanowski ◽  
...  

Purpose: To compare the incidence of oversedation between oral and parenteral diphenhydramine therapy for treatment of opioid-induced pruritus in patients with sickle cell disease vaso-occlusive crisis (SCD VOC). Methods: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included patients greater than or equal to 18 years old with sickle cell disease admitted for vaso-occlusive crisis who received either intravenous or oral diphenhydramine for opioid-induced pruritus. Patients were identified through ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes from June 1, 2016 through July 1, 2017. Rates of oversedation were compared between the 2 formulations. Secondary endpoints included length of stay, amount and duration of diphenhydramine, rate of acute chest and indication for IV therapy. Results: Fifty unique patients were included in the analysis representing 121 admissions. Seven patients received both formulations on separate admissions and were included in both groups. Twenty-nine percent of patients in the IV diphenhydramine group experienced oversedation (12/42) versus 13% in the oral diphenhydramine group (2/15, P = .312). The average number of admissions was significantly higher in the IV versus oral group (2.45 vs 1.20; P = .005) with average and median length of stay also significantly higher in the IV versus oral group (30.57, 16.0 vs 10.67, 10.0; P = .003). Conclusion: While there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of oversedation with use of IV versus oral diphenhydramine formulations, patients with SCD VOC who received IV diphenhydramine had more frequent admissions and a longer length of stay. Clinicians may consider oral diphenhydramine preferentially in appropriate patients over IV administration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 2095-2110
Author(s):  
Ariel Izcovich ◽  
Adam Cuker ◽  
Robert Kunkle ◽  
Ignacio Neumann ◽  
Julie Panepinto ◽  
...  

Abstract Since November 2018, Blood Advances has published American Society of Hematology (ASH) clinical practice guidelines on venous thromboembolism, immune thrombocytopenia, and sickle cell disease. More ASH guidelines on these and other topics are forthcoming. These guidelines have been developed using consistent processes, methods, terminology, and presentation formats. In this article, we describe how patients, clinicians, policymakers, researchers, and others may use ASH guidelines and the many related derivates by describing how to interpret information and how to apply it to clinical decision-making. Also, by exploring how these documents are developed, we aim to clarify their limitations and possible inappropriate usage.


2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Panepinto ◽  
David C. Brousseau ◽  
Cheryl A. Hillery ◽  
J. Paul Scott

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3225-3225
Author(s):  
Cynthia L Anderson ◽  
Karin J Blakemore ◽  
Sophie Lanzkron

Abstract Abstract 3225 BACKGROUND: Little is known about the neonatal outcomes of infants born to mothers with SCD. Women with SCD are often treated for pain with opioid medication either intermittently or chronically throughout pregnancy. The incidence of withdrawal or neonatal abstinence syndrome has not been well described making counseling of these women about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy during pregnancy difficult. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) in babies born to women with sickle cell disease. METHODS: All pregnancies in women with sickle cell disease were identified within the Johns Hopkins Hospital between January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2011. Retrospective data collection was performed using the electronic medical record. Demographic and outcome information recorded included maternal age, gestational age at time of delivery, outcome of pregnancy, maternal genotype, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, neonatal abstinence syndrome diagnosis and neonatal length of stay. Student t-tests and chi square analysis were used to compare outcomes as appropriate. RESULTS: 69 unique patients were identified. From these 69 women, 94 pregnancies were identified. Of these 94 pregnancies, 83 live births were noted. The other 11 pregnancies included 3 spontaneous abortions, 3 ectopic pregnancies, 4 terminations and 1 fetal death in utero. The mean maternal age at time of delivery was 25.5 +/− 5.1 years. The mean gestational age was 36 weeks 2 days (median 36 weeks 6 days with a range of 31 weeks 4 days to 39 weeks 3 days). Of the 83 live births noted in this retrospective cohort, 22 (27%) of these infants were admitted to the NICU and17 (20%) were diagnosed with neonatal abstinence syndrome. Of the 17 infants born with NAS, 12 infants (70%) were born to mothers with SS disease, 3 infants (18%) to mothers with Sβthalassemia and 2 infants (12%) to mothers with SC disease. 53% of babies born with NAS were delivered by C-section which was not statistically significantly different than babies born without NAS (42% p=0.60) The mean birth weight of the babies with NAS was 2521 grams compared to babies without NAS which was 2853 grams (p=0.07). 59% of babies with NAS required NICU care compared to 16% of babies without NAS (p<0.001). The mean length of stay for babies with NAS was significantly longer than those babies without NAS (14.7 days vs. 5.8 days, p=0.003). Of the babies without NAS, 44% had extended hospital stays due to baby-associated complications and the mean LOS was 10.6 days; 10% had extended hospital stays due to complications of the mother with a mean LOS of 6.5 days; and the mean LOS for the 45% of those without mother or baby complications was 2.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Current recommendations include the use of opioids as needed for vaso-occlusive pain in pregnancies complicated by sickle cell disease. While effective, our study demonstrates that a significant percentage of infants exposed to opioids in utero develop neonatal abstinence syndrome. Future studies are indicated to delineate a dose-response relationship if one exists as well as alternative therapies to address this newly recognized important neonatal co-morbidity. Disclosures: Lanzkron: Hemaquest: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NHLBI: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document