Spinal Cord Stimulation for Relief of Chronic Pain in Vasospastic Disorders of the Upper Limbs

1989 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 312
Author(s):  
F. J. ROBAINA ◽  
M. DOMINGUEZ ◽  
M. DIAZ ◽  
J. L. RODRIGUEZ ◽  
J. A. DE VERA
Neurosurgery ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 63???7 ◽  
Author(s):  
F J Robaina ◽  
M Dominguez ◽  
M D??az ◽  
J L Rodriguez ◽  
J A de Vera

Neurosurgery ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Robaina ◽  
Manuel Dominguez ◽  
Manuel Díaz ◽  
José L. Rodriguez ◽  
José A. de Vera

Abstract Eleven patients with chronic pain due to severe vasospastic disorders in the upper limbs were treated with cervical spinal cord stimulation. In 8 patients the pain was due to reflex sympathetic dystrophy in the late stage of the disease, and 3 patients had severe idiopathic Raynaud's disease. The mean follow-up for both groups was 27 months. A total of 10 patients (90.9%) had good or excellent results. Thermographic and plethysmographic changes were observed in both groups. There seems to be a very close relationship between the increase of blood flow and the amount of pain relief achieved. In an attempt to quantify the intensity of pain, the visual analog scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire were used, Stimulation proved to be harmless, with no mortality and very low morbidity. The latter centered around local infection and displacement of the electrodes. No objective changes occurred in trophic alterations such as bone decalcification and ankylosis, but there were improvements in the alterations in the nails and skin. In the reflex sympathetic dystrophy group, the amount of pain relief achieved enabled most patients to undergo subsequent physiotherapy and rehabilitation. In severe cases of reflex sympathetic dystrophy and idiopathic Raynaud's disease, spinal cord stimulation is an alternative treatment that can be used as primary therapy or as secondary therapy after unsuccessful sympathectomy or sympathetic blocks.


Pain ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. S81 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. de Vera ◽  
J.L. Rodriguez ◽  
M. Dominguez ◽  
F. Robaina ◽  
M.A. Martin

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Awinita Barpujari ◽  
Michael A Erdek

Aim: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used to clinically manage and/or treat several chronic pain etiologies. A limited amount is known about the influence on patients' use of opioid pain medication. This retrospective analysis evaluated SCS effect on opioid consumption in patients presenting with chronic pain conditions. Materials & methods: Sixty-seven patients underwent a temporary trial device, permanent implant or both. Patients were divided for assessment based on the nature of their procedure(s). Primary outcome was change in morphine equivalent dose (MED), ascertained from preoperative and postoperative medication reports. Results: Postoperative MED was significantly lower in patients who received some form of neuromodulation therapy. Pretrial patients reported an average MED of 41.01 ± 10.23 mg per day while post-trial patients reported an average of 13.30 ± 5.34 mg per day (p < 0.001). Pre-implant patients reported an average MED of 39.14 ± 13.52 mg per day while post-implant patients reported an average MED of 20.23 ± 9.01 mg per day (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between pre-trial and pre-implant MED, nor between post-trial and post-implant MED. Of the 42 study subjects who reported some amount of pre-intervention opioid use, 78.57% indicated a lower MED (n = 33; p < 0.001), 16.67% indicated no change (n = 7) and 4.76% (n = 2) indicated a higher MED, following intervention. Moreover, SCS therapy resulted in a 26.83% reduction (p < 0.001) in the number of patients with MED >50 mg per day. Conclusion: Spinal cord stimulation may reduce opioid use when implemented appropriately. Neuromodulation may represent alternative therapy for alleviating chronic pain which may avoid a number of deleterious side effects commonly associated with opioid consumption.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Spiegelmann ◽  
William A. Friedman

Abstract Forty-three patients with chronic pain disorders of different causes were selected for spinal cord stimulation. All underwent implantation of a ribbon electrode through a small laminotomy, under general anesthesia. Thirteen patients (30%) failed to obtain significant pain relief during a period of trial stimulation, and their electrodes were removed. The remainder underwent a definitive implant and were followed for a mean of 13 months (range, 3-33 months). Nineteen of them (63%) continued to experience pain relief. A detailed analysis of this series, as well as a literature review, is presented.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarun Prabhala ◽  
Shelby Sabourin ◽  
Marisa DiMarzio ◽  
Michael Gillogly ◽  
Julia Prusik ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 189-191

BACKGROUND: High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) has become very popular in the management of chronic pain worldwide. As it relies on generating high-frequency electrical impulses, there is a risk of interference with other devices such as cochlear implants that utilize similar principles. A literature search did not reveal any case reports of HF-SCS implantation in a patient with cochlear implants. CASE REPORT: A 75-year-old White woman with a history of bilateral cochlear implants (Cochlear Americas Nucleus® with cp910 processor) for severe sensorineural hearing loss presented to our chronic pain clinic with lumbosacral radiculopathy. The patient underwent a HF-SCS trial with entry point at the L1-L2 space and the leads positioned at the top and bottom of T8. The patient did not experience any auditory interference with her Cochlear implant at triple the average SCS stimulation strength. During the follow-up visit the next week, the patient reported nearly 80% symptomatic pain relief and significant functional improvement. There was no change in her hearing and no evidence of interference. The patient ultimately underwent percutaneous SCS paddle electrode placement and at 3 months, continues to have excellent pain relief without any auditory interactions. CONCLUSION: We successfully implanted a HF-SCS at the thoracic level in a patient with bilateral cochlear implants without any auditory interference. KEY WORDS: Cochlear implant, lumbar radiculopathy, spinal cord stimulation


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document