1171: FACE MASK VERSUS HIGH-FLOW OXYGEN DELIVERY OF CONTINUOUS ALBUTEROL IN STATUS ASTHMATICUS

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 569-569
Author(s):  
Nekaiya Jacobs ◽  
Jennifer Munoz Pareja ◽  
Ravi Shankar Samraj ◽  
Leslie Avery ◽  
Mutasim Abu-Hasan ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e037964
Author(s):  
Shahan Waheed ◽  
Nazir Najeeb Kapadia ◽  
Muhammad Faisal Khan ◽  
Salima Mansoor Kerai ◽  
Ahmed Raheem ◽  
...  

IntroductionApnoeic oxygenation is a process of delivering continuous oxygen through nasal cannula during direct laryngoscopy. The oxygen that is delivered through these nasal cannulas is either low flow or high flow. Although the effectiveness of apnoeic oxygenation has been shown through systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials, a comparison of high-flow versus low-flow oxygen delivery has not been tested through a superiority study design. In this study we propose to assess the effectiveness of giving low-flow oxygen with head side elevation versus high-flow oxygen with head side elevation against the usual practice of care in which no oxygen is provided during direct laryngoscopy.Methods and analysisThis will be a three-arm study instituting a block randomisation technique with a sample size of 46 in each arm (see table 1). Due to the nature of the intervention, no blinding will be introduced. The primary outcomes will be lowest non-invasive oxygen saturation measurement during direct laryngoscopy and during the 2 min after the placement of the tube and the first pass success rate. The intervention constitutes head side elevation up to 30° for improving glottis visualisation together with low-flow or high-flow oxygen delivery through nasal cannula to increase safe apnoea time for participants undergoing endotracheal intubation. Primary analysis will be intention to treat.Ethics and disseminationThe study is approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Aga Khan University Hospital (2019-0726-2463). The project is an institution University Research Committee grant recipient 192 002ER-PK. The results of the study will be disseminated among participants, patient communities and healthcare professionals in the institution through seminars, presentations and emails. Further, the findings will be published in a highly accessed peer-reviewed medical journal and will be presented at both national and international conferences.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04242537).


2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinar Uygur ◽  
Sedat Oktem ◽  
Perran Boran ◽  
Engin Tutar ◽  
Gulnur Tokuc

2021 ◽  
pp. e20200590
Author(s):  
Marcelo Alcantara Holanda1,2 ◽  
Betina Santos Tomaz3 ◽  
David Guabiraba Abitbol de Menezes4 ◽  
Juliana Arcanjo Lino4 ◽  
Gabriela Carvalho Gomes4

Cephalalgia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 730-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aneesh B Singhal ◽  
Matthew B Maas ◽  
Joshua N Goldstein ◽  
Brittany B Mills ◽  
David W Chen ◽  
...  

Background Impaired oxygen utilization and cerebrovascular dysfunction are implicated in migraine. High-flow oxygen is effective in cluster headache and has shown promise in animal models of migraine, but has not been adequately studied in patients with migraine. Methods In this randomized, crossover-design, placebo-controlled trial, adult migraineurs self-administered high-flow oxygen or medical air at 10–15 l/min via face mask in blinded fashion starting soon after symptom onset for 30 minutes, for a total of four migraine attacks. Participants recorded the severity of headache, nausea, and visual symptoms on visual analog scales periodically up to 60 minutes. Results We enrolled 22 individuals (mean age 36 years, 20 women) who self-treated 64 migraine attacks (33 oxygen, 31 air). The pre-specified primary endpoint (mean decrease in pain score from baseline to 30 minutes) was 1.38 ± 1.42 in oxygen-treated and 1.22 ± 1.61 in air-treated attacks ( p = 0.674). Oxygen therapy resulted in relief (severity score 0–1) of pain (24% versus 6%, p = 0.05), nausea (42% versus 23%, p = 0.08) and visual symptoms (36% versus 7%, p = 0.004) at 60 minutes. Exploratory analysis showed that in moderately severe attacks (baseline pain score <6), pain relief was achieved in six of 13 (46%) oxygen versus one of 15 (7%) air ( p = 0.02). Gas therapy was used per protocol in 91% of attacks. There were no significant adverse events. Conclusion High-flow oxygen may be a feasible and safe strategy to treat acute migraine. Further studies are required to determine if this relatively inexpensive, widely available treatment can be used as an adjunct or alternative migraine therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document