scholarly journals 121: DEVELOPMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED: YEAR 1 OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY TELE-CRITICAL CARE NETWORK PROJECT

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Jeremy Pamplin ◽  
Jeanette Little ◽  
Christopher Colombo ◽  
Matthew Quinn ◽  
J. Christopher Farmer ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Christopher Colombo ◽  
Christopher Palmer ◽  
Jarone Lee ◽  
Oren Kodish ◽  
Justin Valovich ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1007-1014
Author(s):  
Jeremy C. Pamplin ◽  
Benjamin K. Scott ◽  
Matthew T. Quinn ◽  
Jeanette R. Little ◽  
Matthew R. Goede ◽  
...  

QJM ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 96 (8) ◽  
pp. 583-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Wildman ◽  
J. O’Dea ◽  
O. Kostopoulou ◽  
M. Tindall ◽  
S. Walia ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. e17-e25
Author(s):  
Deborah Hurley ◽  
Sarah M. Gantz ◽  
E. Kate Valcin ◽  
Tara L. Sacco

Topic The development of the Critical Care Beacon Collaborative to achieve meaningful recognition. Clinical Relevance Recognizing nurses for contributions to their work environment and care delivery is important for their professional and personal fulfillment, job satisfaction, and retention; such recognition can occur at the individual, unit, or organizational level. The American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Magnet Recognition Program acknowledges nursing excellence at the organizational level. It would, however, be difficult for an organization to achieve Magnet designation without nursing excellence at the unit level. To recognize excellence at the unit level, the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses developed the Beacon Award in 2003. Objective To describe one academic medical center’s journey toward winning Beacon Awards across 8 units within the adult critical care service. Content Covered The Critical Care Beacon Collaborative resulted in a Beacon Award for each unit and important staff outcomes. This article describes the organization, the process before the Critical Care Beacon Collaborative convened and the desired state, and the methods used to achieve our goal. It also discusses unit- and service-level stakeholder involvement. The successes, lessons learned, sustainability, and growth of the Critical Care Beacon Collaborative are shared to assist readers who aspire to pursue a Beacon Award.


2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 378-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara J. Drew

The electrocardiogram continues to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias and acute myocardial ischemia. The treatment of arrhythmias in critical care units has become less aggressive during the past decade because research indicates that antiarrhythmic agents can be proarrhythmic, causing malignant ventricular arrhythmias such as torsade de pointes. However, during the same period, the treatment of acute myocardial ischemia has become more aggressive, with the goal of preventing or interrupting myocardial infarction by using new antithrombotic and antiplatelet agents and percutaneous coronary interventions. For this reason, critical care nurses should learn how to use ST-segment monitoring to detect acute ischemia, which is often asymptomatic, in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Because the electrocardiographic lead must be facing the localized ischemic zone of the heart to depict the telltale signs of ST-segment deviation, the challenge is to find ways to monitor patients continuously for ischemia without using an excessive number of electrodes and lead wires. The current trend is to use reduced lead set configurations in which 5 or 6 electrodes, placed at convenient places on the chest, are used to construct a full 12-lead electrocardiogram. Nurse scientists at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Nursing are at the forefront in developing and assessing the diagnostic accuracy of these reduced lead set electrocardiograms.


2020 ◽  
pp. 175114372091270
Author(s):  
Jessica Davis ◽  
Karen Berry ◽  
Rebecca McIntyre ◽  
Daniel Conway ◽  
Anthony Thomas ◽  
...  

Background Delirium is a common complication of critical illness with a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. The Greater Manchester Critical Care Network established the Delirium Reduction Working Group in 2015. This article describes a region-wide delirium improvement project launched by that group. Methods Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were undertaken. Cycle 1: April 2015 demonstrated only 48% of patients had a formal delirium screen. Following this a network-wide event took place and the Delirium Standards for the Greater Manchester Critical Care Network were produced. Cycle 2: May 2016 quarterly audits across the network monitored compliance against the agreed standards. Group events involved implementation of a delirium care bundle, sharing best practice, educating staff and providing guidance on the management of delirium. Cycle 3: November 2016 quarterly audit continued and a regional delirium study day was rolled out across the region. Results We have 14 different units across our network, all of which have participated in the audit. The first audit showed a delirium point prevalence of 28%, subsequent point prevalence audits demonstrated rates as low as 13%. There has also been an improvement in the use of delirium screening tools. In the first audit 37% of patients had two delirium screens in 24 h, this has increased to 60% in the latest audit. Improvements were also made in availability of sensory aids and pain assessments. Conclusion The project has demonstrated the feasibility of delivering a coordinated delirium improvement project across multiple critical care units.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document