scholarly journals 265: THE EFFECT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE FELLOWSHIP TRAINING

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Layne Silver ◽  
Aaron Kessel ◽  
Cheryl Taurassi ◽  
Matthew Taylor
Author(s):  
Sonali Basu ◽  
Robin Horak ◽  
Murray M. Pollack

AbstractOur objective was to associate characteristics of pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) fellowship training programs with career outcomes of PCCM physicians, including research publication productivity and employment characteristics. This is a descriptive study using publicly available data from 2557 PCCM physicians from the National Provider Index registry. We analyzed data on a systematic sample of 690 PCCM physicians representing 62 fellowship programs. There was substantial diversity in the characteristics of fellowship training programs in terms of fellowship size, intensive care unit (ICU) bed numbers, age of program, location, research rank of affiliated medical school, and academic metrics based on publication productivity of their graduates standardized over time. The clinical and academic attributes of fellowship training programs were associated with publication success and characteristics of their graduates' employment hospital. Programs with greater publication rate per graduate had more ICU beds and were associated with higher ranked medical schools. At the physician level, training program attributes including larger size, older program, and higher academic metrics were associated with graduates with greater publication productivity. There were varied characteristics of current employment hospitals, with graduates from larger, more academic fellowship training programs more likely to work in larger pediatric intensive care units (24 [interquartile range, IQR: 16–35] vs. 19 [IQR: 12–24] beds; p < 0.001), freestanding children's hospitals (52.6 vs. 26.3%; p < 0.001), hospitals with fellowship programs (57.3 vs. 40.3%; p = 0.01), and higher affiliated medical school research ranks (35.5 [IQR: 14–72] vs. 62 [IQR: 32, unranked]; p < 0.001). Large programs with higher academic metrics train physicians with greater publication success (H index 3 [IQR: 1–7] vs. 2 [IQR: 0–6]; p < 0.001) and greater likelihood of working in large academic centers. These associations may guide prospective trainees as they choose training programs that may foster their career values.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. e309-e316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maki Ishizuka ◽  
Vijayeta Rangarajan ◽  
Taylor L. Sawyer ◽  
Natalie Napolitano ◽  
Donald L. Boyer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 135-146
Author(s):  
Kyle Rehder ◽  
George Ofori-Amanfo ◽  
David Turner ◽  
Awni Al-Subu

AbstractTo describe the current use of noninvasive monitoring compared with traditional invasive monitoring in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) accredited fellowship programs in the United States. A web-based survey with the primary aim of describing the utilization of noninvasive monitoring compared with invasive monitoring was distributed to PCCM program directors (PDs) at the 64 accredited fellowship training programs. Questions focused on demographics and the utilization of invasive and noninvasive monitoring for specific patient populations and disease states. Forty-two (66%) PDs responded to the survey. Capnography and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) were the most commonly reported noninvasive monitoring technology. Arterial and central venous catheters were widely used. Other invasive monitoring devices were used sparingly. Despite widespread use of both invasive and noninvasive monitoring in academic pediatric critical care units across the United States, there is significant variability in the use of noninvasive monitoring compared with invasive monitoring. Further investigation is needed to define the standard of care for the use of noninvasive monitors as practitioners attempt to optimize care while minimizing risks and complications.


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
H Jurair ◽  
A shabir ◽  
K Hussain ◽  
QE Abbas ◽  
AU Haque

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 63
Author(s):  
A Sachdev ◽  
S Dhingra

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
M Manivachagan ◽  
D Boddu ◽  
K Ebenezer ◽  
E Jacob

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document