A Pictorial Review of PI-RADS v2.0 and PI-RADS v2.1: What Changed?

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (25) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nicolas Gibson ◽  
Christopher Fung
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seon Hyeong Choi ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim ◽  
Jin Young Kwak ◽  
Min Jung Kim ◽  
Ki Kun Oh

2021 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 109722
Author(s):  
Raekha Kumar ◽  
Scott Rice ◽  
Ravi Kumar Lingam

Author(s):  
Marco Becciolini ◽  
Christopher Pivec ◽  
Andrea Raspanti ◽  
Georg Riegler

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra D’Amico ◽  
Teresa Perillo ◽  
Lorenzo Ugga ◽  
Renato Cuocolo ◽  
Arturo Brunetti

AbstractIntra-cranial and spinal foreign body reactions represent potential complications of medical procedures. Their diagnosis may be challenging as they frequently show an insidious clinical presentation and can mimic other life-threatening conditions. Their pathophysiological mechanism is represented by a local inflammatory response due to retained or migrated surgical elements. Cranial interventions may be responsible for the presence of retained foreign objects represented by surgical materials (such as sponges, bone wax, and Teflon). Spinal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, including myelography, chordotomy, vertebroplasty, and device implantation, are another potential source of foreign bodies. These reactions can also follow material migration or embolization, for example in the case of Lipiodol, Teflon, and cement vertebroplasty. Imaging exams, especially CT and MRI, have a central role in the differential diagnosis of these conditions together with patient history. Neuroradiological findings are dependent on the type of material that has been left in or migrated from the surgical area. Knowledge of these entities is relevant for clinical practice as the correct identification of foreign bodies and related inflammatory reactions, material embolisms, or migrations can be difficult. This pictorial review reports neuroradiological semeiotics and differential diagnosis of foreign body-related imaging abnormalities in the brain and spine.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavian Tabotta ◽  
Gilbert R. Ferretti ◽  
Helmut Prosch ◽  
Samia Boussouar ◽  
Anne-Laure Brun ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute or chronic non-neoplastic diffuse mediastinal diseases have multiple causes, degrees of severity, and a wide range of management. Some situations require emergency care while others do not need specific treatment. Although the diagnosis may be suspected on chest X-ray, it is mainly based on CT. A delayed recognition is not uncommonly observed. Some findings may prompt the radiologist to look for specific associated injuries or lesions. This pictorial review will successively describe the various non-neoplastic causes of diffuse mediastinal diseases with their typical findings and major differentials. First, pneumomediastinum that can be provoked by extra- or intra-thoracic triggers requires the knowledge of patient’s history or recent occurrences. Absence of any usual etiological factor should raise suspicion of cocaine inhalation in young individuals. Next, acute mediastinitis may be related to post-operative complications, esophageal perforation, or contiguous spread of odontogenic or retropharyngeal infections. The former diagnosis is not an easy task in the early stage, owing to the similarities of imaging findings with those of normal post-operative appearance during the first 2–3 weeks. Finally, fibrosing mediastinitis that is linked to an excessive fibrotic reaction in the mediastinum with variable compromise of mediastinal structures, in particular vascular and airway ones. Differential diagnosis includes tumoral and inflammatory infiltrations of the mediastinum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document