A Cohort Model of Mentoring as Facilitator to the Transition to an Academic Nurse Faculty Position Following Completion of a PhD

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Viveiros ◽  
Monika Schuler ◽  
Joohyun Chung ◽  
Lynn D’Esmond
NASPA Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis McCluskey-Titus ◽  
Tony W. Cawthon

A research study was conducted using the small population of current graduate preparation faculty who were both NASPA members and former student affairs practitioners (n=38). The purpose of this study was to discover the benefits and challenges faced by practitioners when moving from an administrative position to a full-time faculty position in a student personnel preparation program. The following subjects were considered in this study: factors respondents considered when moving to a full-time faculty position, challenges respondents encountered in making the career change, differences between former administrative positions and current faculty positions, and type of preparation respondents reported were necessary for success in a faculty role. Some of the positive differences respondents described included: control over their quality of life, the ability to focus on teaching and research, and the ability to contribute to the profession. Certain challenges were recounted by respondents such as adjusting to the faculty culture and work expectations, development of a research agenda, having fewer resources as a full-time faculty member, and a difference in quality and nature of relationships.


2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 639-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Gignoux ◽  
Joanna House ◽  
David Hall ◽  
Dominique Masse ◽  
Hassan B. Nacro ◽  
...  

Demography ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 1797-1819 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua R. Goldstein ◽  
Thomas Cassidy
Keyword(s):  

Biometrika ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kuang ◽  
B. Nielsen ◽  
J. P. Nielsen

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (10-11) ◽  
pp. 3363-3391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip S Rosenberg

We develop a new age-period-cohort model for cancer surveillance research; the theory and methods are broadly applicable. In the new model, cohort deviations are weighted to account for the variable number of periods that each cohort is observed. Weighting ensures that the fitted rates can be naturally expressed as a function of age × a function of period × a function of cohort. Furthermore, the age, period, and cohort deviations are split into orthogonal quadratic components plus higher-order terms. These decompositions enable powerful combination significance tests of first- and second-order age, period, and cohort effects. The regression parameters of the orthogonal quadratic polynomials (global curvatures) quantify how fast on average the trends in the rates are changing. Importantly, the global curvature for cohort determines the least squares slope of the expected annual percentage changes by age group versus age (local drifts), thereby providing a powerful one-degree-of-freedom test of age-period interactions. We introduce new estimable functions, including age gradients that quantify the rate of change of the longitudinal and cross-sectional age curves at each attained age, and gradient shifts that quantify how the cross-sectional age trend varies by period. We illustrate the new model using nationally representative multiple myeloma incidence. Comprehensive proofs are given in technical appendices. We provide an R package.


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Phoenix Bittner ◽  
Cynthia Francis Bechtel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document