Examining the Cross-cultural Validity of the English Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire Using the Matched Moderated Regression Methodology

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Zinke ◽  
Chow S. Lam ◽  
R. Norman Harden ◽  
Louis Fogg
Pain Medicine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuyuki Arimura ◽  
Masako Hosoi ◽  
Yoshihiro Tsukiyama ◽  
Toshiyuki Yoshida ◽  
Daiki Fujiwara ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (13) ◽  
pp. E774-E781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eivind Hasvik ◽  
Anne Julsrud Haugen ◽  
Stacey Haukeland-Parker ◽  
Stein Arne Rimehaug ◽  
Johannes Gjerstad ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang-Lin Wang ◽  
Wei-Jun Zhang ◽  
Min Gao ◽  
Shengfa Zhang ◽  
Dong-Hua Tian ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirosha P. Edirisinghe ◽  
Thamasi R. Makuloluwa ◽  
Thamara D. Amarasekara ◽  
Christine S. E. Goonewardena

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 22-25
Author(s):  
Adriana Boţan ◽  
Monica Chiş ◽  
Sanda-Maria Copotoiu

AbstractThe first and most important step in pain management is to correctly assess it. Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2(SF-MPQ-2) and Multidimensional Pain Evaluation Scale (MPES) are valid and reliable tools used in clinical practice and research. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments applied for pain relief. 27 patients were included in the study, of which 12 were outpatients and 15 were inpatients. Statistical and clinical significant differences were obtained only for the inpatient group on the MPES (p=0.00, difference between means=3.07) and for 3 out of 4 domains of the SF-MPQ-2 (p=0.01, 0.01 and 0.00 and the difference between means=2.60, 2.00 and 2.20 for continuous pain, neuropathic pain and affective descriptors, respectively). Outcomes of pain management are better for inpatients due to a combination of analgesic drugs with physical medicine and rehabilitation procedures and a strict monitoring during their hospitalization.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karine Azevedo São Leão Ferreira ◽  
Daniel Ciampi de Andrade ◽  
Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Collings ◽  
Lotten Lindblom ◽  
Sylvester N. Madu ◽  
Myung Sook Park

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 640-646
Author(s):  
Keri J S Brady ◽  
Pengsheng Ni ◽  
Gabrielle G Grant ◽  
Catherine R Thorpe ◽  
Deborah Nadler ◽  
...  

Abstract The Young Adult Burn Outcome Questionnaire (YABOQ) is a validated, English-language patient-reported outcome assessment of young adults’ recovery from burn injury across 15 scale domains. We evaluated the cross-cultural validity of a newly developed Spanish version of the YABOQ. Secondary data from English- and Spanish-speaking burn survivors (17 to 30 years of age) were obtained from the Multicenter Benchmarking Study. We conducted classic psychometric analyses and evaluated the measurement equivalence of the English and Spanish YABOQs in logistic and ordinal logistic regression differential item functioning analyses. All multi-item scales in the Spanish YABOQ demonstrated adequate reliability except the Pain and Itch scales. One item in the Perceived Appearance scale showed differential item functioning across English- and Spanish-speaking burn survivors, but the observed differential item functioning had no clinically significant impact on scale-level Perceived Appearance scores. Our findings support the cross-cultural validity of the YABOQ Physical Function, Perceived Appearance, Sexual Function, Emotion, Family Function, Family Concern, Satisfaction with Symptom Relief, Satisfaction with Role, Work Reintegration and Religion scales among English- and Spanish-speaking young adult burn survivors. This work supports the use of these English and Spanish YABOQ scales to assess the effect of therapeutic interventions on young adults’ burn outcomes in pooled analyses and to assess disparities in young adults’ burn outcomes across language groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document