scholarly journals Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist versus Pressure Support Ventilation in Difficult Weaning

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 1482-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Liu ◽  
Xiaoting Xu ◽  
Qin Sun ◽  
Yue Yu ◽  
Feiping Xia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Difficult weaning frequently develops in ventilated patients and is associated with poor outcome. In neurally adjusted ventilatory assist, the ventilator is controlled by diaphragm electrical activity, which has been shown to improve patient–ventilator interaction. The objective of this study was to compare neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and pressure support ventilation in patients difficult to wean from mechanical ventilation. Methods In this nonblinded randomized clinical trial, difficult-to-wean patients (n = 99) were randomly assigned to neurally adjusted ventilatory assist or pressure support ventilation mode. The primary outcome was the duration of weaning. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of successful weaning, patient–ventilator asynchrony, ventilator-free days, and mortality. Weaning duration was calculated as 28 days for patients under mechanical ventilation at day 28 or deceased before day 28 without successful weaning. Results Weaning duration in all patients was statistically significant shorter in the neurally adjusted ventilatory assist group (n = 47) compared with the pressure support ventilation group (n = 52; 3.0 [1.2 to 8.0] days vs. 7.4 [2.0 to 28.0], mean difference: −5.5 [95% CI, −9.2 to −1.4], P = 0.039). Post hoc sensitivity analysis also showed that the neurally adjusted ventilatory assist group had shorter weaning duration (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.98). The proportion of patients with successful weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation was higher in neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (33 of 47 patients, 70%) compared with pressure support ventilation (25 of 52 patients, 48%; respiratory rate for neurally adjusted ventilatory assist: 1.46 [95% CI, 1.04 to 2.05], P = 0.026). The number of ventilator-free days at days 14 and 28 was statistically significantly higher in neurally adjusted ventilatory assist compared with pressure support ventilation. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist improved patient ventilator interaction. Mortality and length of stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital were similar among groups. Conclusions In patients difficult to wean, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist decreased the duration of weaning and increased ventilator-free days. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 96-100
Author(s):  
Hussam Abd Elfatah Mohamed ◽  
Mohamed Amin Fakher ◽  
Moamen Arafa ◽  
Khaled Abd Wahab Selem ◽  
Alia Abd El Fatah

BACKGROUND: Patient-mechanical ventilator (MV) asynchrony despite optimal adjustment of MV parameters is a common problem that is partly associated with difficult weaning of MV. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a mode of proportional ventilation that count on diaphragmatic activity (measured by special esophageal probe and expressed as diaphragm electrical [Edi]) to provide proportional support to patient effort which differs from one breath to another according to Edi signal. AIM: The purpose of this trial is to determine the impact of NAVA compared to pressure support ventilation (PSV) mode in decreasing patient-MV asynchrony and hemodynamic effect in patients on MV with expected difficult weaning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective interventional trial was conducted on 30 critically ill on MV with expected difficult weaning. First, patients were put on PSV mode for 24 h. Then, patients were put on NAVA mode (for weaning) for the next 24 h. The incidence of different types of asynchrony in both modes was investigated. RESULTS: NAVA mode significantly reduced the asynchrony index when compared to PSV (1.1 ± 0.39% vs. 2.8 ± 1.1, respectively, p < 0.001), P/F ratio was significantly higher during NAVA (250 in NAVA vs. 210 in PSV, p < 0.001), heart rate, and mean arterial blood pressure were significantly reduced during NAVA (p < 0.001 and 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PSV, NAVA-reduced patient-MV asynchrony significantly and increased the P/F ratio significantly with better hemodynamics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document